If you have a project that builds one project before building the next, but the next needs to know the 'path' of the first build, is it possible to get this?
For example:
Project A has Build Configuration A and Build Configuration B.
Build Configuration B has a dependency on Build Configuration A. From without the Build Configuration B it will need access to the path of Build Configuration A. Is there are a way to obtain this?
Most simple approach would be to define a custom checkout directory in the A and use the same hard-coded value in B.
If you use TeamCity snapshot or artifact dependencies, you can use %dep.btXXX.teamcity.build.checkoutDir% to get checkout directory of the dependency build. However, this will not work in 6.5.0-6.5.5 TeamCity versions, see details and workaround in the issue TW-18715.
However, you should really avoid accessing checkout directory of one build from another. If you need sources of A, you can checkout them in B; if you output of the A's build, then publishing the output as build's artifacts and then using TeamCity artifact dependencies is the way to go. In both cases additionally using TeamCity snapshot dependencies will ensure both builds use the same sources snapshot which is probably what you need.
If you have one agent, and only ever one agent then you could try and use the path from a previous build.
I wouldn't recommend doing this however because if you had two agents, or scaled up in the future to two agents, then it is possible your projects will be built on different agents; this would mean your dependency working directory won't be on the same machine, or it will be outdated as the latest was built elsewhere.
I assume you're after the path of the first build to get its output?
If so, the method we use to share dependencies between projects is to checkin the output from each project into our source control, then every project that requires the output simply has to check them out.
Related
I have a project that depends on another project, how can I configure Jenkins to use the reference of that project in the workspace.
For an example, project B depends on a certain set of classes from project A. Jenkins should be aware to build project A first and then B.
The trigger point is when a commit is pushed to the master of project B.
If a project depends upon another project, it is typically part of the same solution and always part of the same source tree. This means the slave will probably have the source already - or if it doesn't, the step that obtains the source needs the workspace mapping updated to not exclude it.
Also, when a project depends upon another project, the reference information includes the path to the referenced project. In the absence of solution file, this is used directly to build the other project with the same configuration (as in Debug/Release).
It's usually best to use a solution file instead of building projects directly as that ensures platform/configuration customisation is honoured as well as determining the correct build order of the projects.
So I got it sorted out. Since my project was based on project reference, the path had to be the same.
Naming the Jenkins project folder same as the dependent project name I referenced solved the issue.
I was under the impression that another workspace can't access another workspace. But it seems to be Jenkins handles it internally when building projects.
Is there a way to alter a build using the CLI after having published it?
UseCase: A deployer (be it automated or manual) wants to add additional files (e.g. Testresult-logs) to an already published build (because they need very long to be created but the artifacts of the fresh build should be published asap).
When I redo a jfrog rt bp over and over again I get "new" builds with the same description (same buildnumer etc.) instead of overwriting/extending existing build.
Appreciating any hint :-)
The main idea of the buildinfo in Artifactory is that they are immutable, which means they cannot be modified post publish. This is to make sure the integrity of them.
In your case, a possible way to achieve this may be:
When publishing the artifacts themselves, you might want to not publish the buildinfo.
You can collect buildinfo through your build cycle, and publish everything as a single buildinfo object after all the tests.
I am trying to create Team City build template which requires minimum customisation, and I want it to play nicely with legacy projects and projects developed with .NET Core/Standard and .NET CLI.
I am stuck with NuGet as there were some considerable changes in how things work.
Earlier we had to create nuspec file to pack project as a NuGet package. At least in that file we could define various package-related properties.
New csproj file format allows us to define all package properties inside itself. That's fine, but how then do we know which projects should be packaged and which should not?
So far our TeamCity's build step Pack NuGet just contained **.nuspec for Specification files: field. The very fact of nuspec file presence served like a flag pack & publish this project.
However, for dotnet pack we need to specify the project. There is no simple way to distinguish 'main' projects from 'auxiliary' ones on which mains depend. (Let us ignore that project-to-project references are currently not supported.)
We either could pack all projects specifying **.*proj (yet in that case we are to know which packages to publish) or we might specify projects explicitly in a build configuration, but I don't like this approach because you must edit build configuration each time new project is added to the solution.
I also considered the option Generate package on build and omit dot net pack step as package is created on build. The only thing left is publishing the packages with dotnet nuget push specifying **/%BuildConfiguration%/*.nupkg.
Unfortunately when starting build against solution without projects with enabled Generate package on build makes TC fail complaining that
Target files not found for pattern "**/Release/*.nupkg"
Hence, I either need another recipe for achieving the required result or an advice how to make TC consider empty result just as a NOP and mark build as successful.
Yet another option is to use nuspec even for new csproj...
Since TeamCity 2017.2 will be available option to associate build configuration with multiple templates. So you will be able to create different templates to create packages for old projects and new .NET CLI projects.
To specify paths for target .NET projects, which should be packaged, you could use build configuration parameters.
To set such parameters during the build you could send in the preceding build step service message. The value of this parameter could be set to the list of target project files which could be selected via script like that: https://stackoverflow.com/a/8153857/305875
We use Team City as our CI server and Build Master as our deployment mechanism. I have a project that builds and runs test on teamcity and creates a release-0.0.%build.number%.zip.
How do i instruct Build Master to get the latest release-0.0.%build.number%.zip?
Currently I use Create Build Artifact which collects files from a directory, but this is causing problems for us. I already have the artifact as a .zip and just want to deploy that.
Have you looked at the TeamCity Extensions? The idea that immediately comes to mind is to use the Get TeamCity Artifact action, which has the option to use latest Build or specify a variable. This might be easiser than pulling from disk, too.
We've got an Asp.Net web application we're trying to get pseudo-deployed to a folder, and I'm starting to think Microsoft are crazy -- why is it so hard to get a WAP to do a "Local FileSystem" deploy as part of MSBuild?
I can build with this:
msbuild .\SubSite.csproj "/p:Platform=AnyCPU;Configuration=Release" /t:Package
And get a nice package.zip which I can deploy to a website...
However, I have two projects in my solution, which I need to combine before I ship them, so I want to deploy both packages into a folder, and then re-package that folder. Despite the documentation on technet to the contrary, it doesn't seem to be possible to do:
msdeploy -verb:sync -source:package=.\SubSite.zip -dest:contentPath=.\Www\SubSite
Because you get the error:
Source (sitemanifest) and destination (contentPath) are not compatible for the given operation.
Does anyone have a suggestion of how I could web deploy two sites inside one another without manually copying files out of a "PackageTmp" folder? I mean, I'm aware that I could just skip zipping the package and manually copy the files out to do this, but I'm not happy about having to create a custom target, and there's no other way to find that just to do something that should be built in.
We did eventually figure out how to do this, but I'm not really happy about it ;-)
Basically, (as mentioned elsewhere on so), you can call msbuild with the target set to _WPPCopyWebApplication. You can also specify/override the WebProjectOutputDir property when you do that. Something like this (where ${name} are variables we're using)
msbuild ${SourcePath}\Www\UI\UI.csproj "/p:Platform=AnyCPU;Configuration=Release;WebProjectOutputDir=${OutputPath}\AppRoot" "/t:_WPPCopyWebApplication"
msbuild ${SourcePath}\Www\Mobile\Mobile.csproj "/p:Platform=AnyCPU;Configuration=Release;WebProjectOutputDir=${OutputPath}\AppRoot\Mobile" "/t:_WPPCopyWebApplication"
msbuild ${SourcePath}\Www\Service\WebService.csproj "/p:Platform=AnyCPU;Configuration=Release;WebProjectOutputDir=${OutputPath}\AppRoot\WebServices" "/t:_WPPCopyWebApplication"
We can then package up the whole "AppRoot" in a separate step.