i have a div element (class "content") that contains 2 divs and a sibling of the first div that has bottom: 0px; attribute and fixed height and i wanted the div with the class "gallery" to expand as much as they don't flow over their parent div.
and also ... i saw that except the firefox browser, chrome, opera and safari shows the search input in the upper right corner 4-5 pixels upper than normal. why is that?
http://goaltod.iulianonofrei.com/
You have 2 questions here.
The first question is not clear, "contains 2 divs and a sibling of the first div", isn't the sibling of the first div - the second div? Also it is not clear what you want to do, in general it seems that you have everything global positioned, so you why not set the gallery div with the exact dimensions you want. For the content it contains you can use overflow:auto so it will create an internal scroller when needed.
For the second question, looks like the problem is in firefox. if you set the top and padding of the input element to 0, it still does align with the containing td element. This is a very odd usage of table elements and I would advise against it... You probably should use div elements instead.
Because you used height: 100% the content will match the height of it parent element. And the other elements push it down.
There are a few ways you could fix this:
Use a table base layout (fully supported, but frowned upon)
Use the new CSS 3 flex box layout (no old IE support)
Put the header and footer in the content, then position them absolute.
I would recommend the 3rd option which is demonstrated here: http://jsfiddle.net/tnRpR/
Related
strong textSeems like a common problem, but in my case it's complicated by a few extra requirements, so what I found on SO and MDN didn't lead me to a full solution.
Simple premise:
Horizontal nav bar, full width of the page, semi-transparent background, variable number of tabs (extra space filled with same background as tabs).
Easy, right? Give the container element rgba background, set nav items display:inline or float them left and you're golden.
Complication 1: Active tab has to have a triangular cutout (see pic).
Ok, I can have a cutout by setting background-image to a png with transparent bit. The background of the parent element would get in the way - so set background to individual elements instead of parent.
What about the variable width "empty space" past the tabs (see pic)? Ok, put an empty element with a larger than life width, and cut it off with overflow:hidden on the parent.
Complication 2:
Buttons need tooltips on hover.
Ah, the thrill! The suspense! overflow:hidden won't do unless I put tooltips outside of nav div altogether (which would probably work - but seems smelly).
So, here are a few things I tried:
Old implementation which doesn't have the "filler" element width problem but clips off half a tooltip (with overflow:hidden):
http://codepen.io/istro/pen/aHcdi
Messing with display:table seems to give little control over how display:table-cell div width is decided, also needs content to display the div in the first place. Content can be moved away, but still no good (didn't even add a tooltip here):
http://codepen.io/istro/pen/uIcfn
Messing with floats (tooltip sorta where I'd want it to be more or less), but clueless how to make the last "filler" element fit remaining width:
http://codepen.io/istro/pen/aIGxB
So the question - how could I make a div to fill the remaining width with CSS only? Or perhaps I'm asking the wrong question altogether, in which case what ideas would I use to implement it cleanly?
Thanks!!!
So, I tried doing position:absolute, but whenever I place something new, (eg a div) the other div gets pushed down.
Eg. without other div
Box
With other div
other div
box
Thanks :D
Are you sure the CSS rule is not ovewritten? (Check this with a browser code inspector, such as Firefox's Firebug or Opera's Dragonfly)
Additionally, If you want the div to be put on a place despite srolling,
use
position: fixed
instead. This will keep your object on a fixed place in the page.
You can usually use position:fixed or position:absolute.
If you want the element to be stuck on the screen no matter how to scroll, you can use position:fixed. Make sure that your top & left or bottom & right are set appropriately. Also make sure that the z-index is set appropriately, so no other element is covering it.
position:absolute; DOES depend on the parents of that element. If a parent of that element is positioned, then the absolute positioning will position the element within that element.
do you have examples of your code?
I'm working on an interface that utilizes a list of items within a scrollable div, some of which utilize a rollover menu on hover that extends outside of the div. Disabled scripting compatibility is a priority for the site, so I'm trying to see if the interface can be done with only CSS before I start getting into other compromises.
I've got some examples below. The menu in question is on the right side with heading 'select projects'. The third list item from the top in each page contains a rollover menu.
In order to keep the rollovers positioned relative to the their parent when scroll position changes, I positioned the parent li's relative and the child ul's positioned absolute.
EXAMPLE 1
Of course, once overflow:auto is on and the scroll in place, the rollovers are cut off from displaying.
EXAMPLE 2
I tried removing the relative positioning of the parent li's, and retaining the absolute positioning of the rollovers to free them from the div, but then they do not position properly when scroll position is changed.
I can only post two links but if you want an illustration, it's here: eypaedesign.com/markets-rollover-issue-no-relative.htm
With the exception of changing the UI, is there a combination of properties I'm not seeing here that can be used to make this interface work on CSS? I could position the entire div as absolute, and add a large amount of left padding for the rollovers to appear in, but that seems pretty inelegant.
Thanks folks -
With only CSS, you are limited to only one or the other: overflow: auto or overflowing hover-menus. Using separate visible and auto properties for overflow-x and overflow-y doesn't work, so I think your best bet is to go with the padding solution you were considering.
With proper use of absolute positioning and z-index (in case you are concerned about padded menu container hit-blocking any elements under the padding), you should be able to do it without destroying the rest of your layout. You'll have to control the size of all child elements inside the scrollable container of course, so that they don't extend to the full width of their padded parent.
Adding these properties - with no other changes - seems to work on your site, so perhaps you can get away with it easily:
#project_menu {
padding-left: 300px;
margin-left: -300px;
}
.center {
position: relative;
z-index; 10;
}
if you put a height of 293px in your class nav it should be ok.
Or in you project_menu ID, As I can see that ID has a height of 218px and your UL is 293px.
By changing one of those 2 you should be ok. It depends on how you set it affect other element.
But using project_menu ID should be just good.
I know this kind of question get asked everyday, but I don't seem to find a solution to this particular one...
So, the idea is pretty simple, I want to create a 3 column fixed width layout, with 100% width header and footer.
Everything seems to work aside from the footer.
Here is an example: http://jsfiddle.net/xMQLy/1/
So essentially the problem seems to be that, because the main body + lateral columns does not have a fixed height, the footer is not positioned at their bottom.
How would I go fixing that?
thanks
Using absolute or fixed for the position CSS property rips an element from the context of the parent. So, the parent width/height won't be affected by this child's size. The float properties also have this effect: It's not possible to effectively style using position:absolute/fixed or float.
I've thrown away these properties, and revised your code: #Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/xMQLy/5/
Some changes:
Thrown away useless CSS properties:
.wrapper{position:relative;top:0}
`.leftcol and .rightcol {floar:right/left}
Grouped together common styles (.leftcol, .main, .rightcol).
Updated HTML source, added a <div class="wrapper-align"> wrapper around each div in the source, and removed whitespace between these wrappers [1]
[1]The .leftcol, .main, .rightcol elements can be positioned next to each other applying display:inline-block on each div. However, the default alignment for these elements is the bottom. Because the columns have to be located at the top, vertical-align:top has to be used. This CSS property can only be used at inline elements. To achieve this layout without messing with float or display:absolute/fixed, an inline wrapper around a display-block element is necessary.
The whitespaces have to be removed, to prevent creating a gap between the elements. To illustrate, compare these pages: No whitespace vs White space.
I'm having a few problems trying to position some divs in my website layout. All of them is related to the div's size. I'm using Chrome's developer tools to inspect the divs and when I mouse over some divs it is just 1px-high, but it has content inside and its content has some height. Shouldn't it have at least the same height of its content?
I don't know if I explained well, so I'm posting some images. I'm using Blueprint CSS Framework and it happens when I use class="span-XX" and inside it I don't use neither class
Here is some images (click to zoom)
The parent div
The div with problem (no height)
The child div
The parent div has class="span-XX", the div with problem has only #search
which is this one
I suspect it is some float or positioning issue with css but I don't know what it is and how to deal with it. I have also a list containing the social networks on the top of the site which ul has the same problem.
If you have floats inside, you need to clear them. Apply overflow:hidden; zoom:1; to the parent containing the floats and it should resolve it.
If you have negative margins / position + relative and negative offset and cant use overflow hidden use a clearfix... http://work.arounds.org/clearing-floats/
Your child div has the float property set, so the parent div will not expand height-wise to contain it. To get the behavior you expect, set overflow: hidden on the parent div.