Need help determining how to position this element with CSS - css

I am attempting to style some html that I do not have control over. WYSIWYG. What I need to do is:
Have the text not wrap under the image.
Control the text's vertical position. I am trying to position it approximately along the horizontal centerline of the image.
Text cannot be fixed width (the image however, can and is fixed width).
I have tried display: table, floating the text element and absolute positioning text, but they all had different problems. Thank you for any further ideas.
http://jsfiddle.net/6fjCX/3/ (you may need to shrink frame width to see effect)
img {
height: 66px;
width: 165px;
border: 1px solid black;
}
#title-text {
font-size: 32px;
line-height: 36px;
}
<h1 id="title-heading" class="pagetitle">
<img class="logo global custom" src="" alt="">
<span id="title-text">
Installing Confluence 3.4 on a Windows 64 bit system
</span>
</h1>

I set a width on both elements as well as the wrapper <h1>, to make sure they would float next to each other and there would be no text underneath the image.
Try something like this: http://jsfiddle.net/6fjCX/5/
img {
height: 66px;
width: 165px;
border: 1px solid black;
background: red;
/* Float the image */
float:left;
}
#title-text {
font-size: 28px;
/* Since the element comes after in the markup */
float:right;
/* (h1 width) - (img width) - (#title-text left padding/margin) */
width:420px;
}
#title-heading {
/* set to a width that works for you */
width:600px;
}
You could also absolutely position the span and set position:relative on the h1, but I try to avoid absolute positioning when possible.
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/6fjCX/7/
img {
height: 66px;
width: 165px;
border: 1px solid black;
background: red;
float:left;
}
#title-text {
font-size: 28px;
position:absolute;
top:0;
/* (img width) + (span left padding) */
left:175px;
}
#title-heading {
/* contain absolute positioned elements */
position:relative;
}

Related

Creating a border gap

I'm trying to get a gap created within a div's border to fit an image, similar to this:
Is there a way to do this in pure CSS? All I can see is:
.box {
background: url(img.png) bottom left;
border-top: 1px solid #eee;
border-left: 1px solid #eee;
}
But my problem is border-right: 1px solid #eee; creates a line on top of my image, which is of course not desired.
It needs to be responsive. This image is an example, but you get the general idea.
Something like this?
http://jsfiddle.net/6Ufb5/
div {
border: 1px solid #ccc;
position: relative;
}
img {
position: absolute;
top: 10px;
left: 10px;
}
Give the container position relative and the img absolute, shift it to left 10px and shift it down 10px from the top and you have what you desire.
For the responsive part, that's just giving the container and/or img a % width.
Like so:
http://jsfiddle.net/6Ufb5/2/
You can achieve this by using absolute positioning of the image element - and it has to be in a <img> element, not as the background image because it will never overlap the parent border (or even if it does by adjusting the background-position property, the border will lie on top of the background image... a behavior that is expected, by the way.
<div class="box">
Content goes here
<img src="http://placehold.it/300x200" />
</div>
And the CSS:
.box {
position: relative;
border: 1px solid #333;
}
.box img {
position: absolute;
bottom: -1px;
right: -1px;
}
If you want a dynamic and/or responsive solution, you might have to resort to JS to doing so - such as resizing the image depending on the box dimensions, and assigning a height to the box to take into account of the image height (since image is absolutely positioned, it is taken out of the document flow).
See fiddle here: http://jsfiddle.net/teddyrised/xH6UV/
This might work if you can alter your markup. For accessibility I think the image should be an image and not a background, and this method is responsive (though you may want to alter margins at small sizes with media queries).
http://jsfiddle.net/isherwood/79Js5
.box {
border: 1px solid #ccc;
display: inline-block;
padding: 10px 0 10px 10px;
width: 40%;
}
.box img {
margin-right: -10%;
margin-bottom: -10%;
width: 105%;
}
<div class="box">
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x100/f3f3f3" />
</div>

How do you vertically align an empty div inside a full height div?

Big picture: I'm trying to make a bar graph made up of discrete units. Each unit will be a div. The bar will grow from bottom to top.
Details: I have a container div that holds all of the unit divs, or blocks. The container has a vertical-align of bottom to do this.
This is what it should look like: https://jsfiddle.net/hpf4h/1/
<div id="container">
<div class="block"></div>
<div class="block"></div>
<div class="block"></div>
</div>
#container {
height: 100px;
width: 10px;
padding: 1px;
background-color: #00f;
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: bottom;
}
.block {
height: 10px;
width: 10px;
margin: 1px 0px 1px 0px;
background-color: #0f0;
}
That works fine, but I need the container to have a height of 100%. Which makes this happen: https://jsfiddle.net/7n7ZH/1/
I'd prefer to find a way to do this with CSS, preferably not too hacky. I'm already using jQuery for the behavior in my project, so I could use that as a last resort.
Edit: Also, all parent tags also have a height of 100%, including HTML and body.
Make #container's container element display:table like this : https://jsfiddle.net/7n7ZH/2/
html, body { height: 100%; margin:0; }
body { display:table; }
#container {
height: 100%;
width: 10px;
padding: 1px;
background-color: #00f;
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: bottom;
}
.block {
height: 10px;
width: 10px;
margin: 1px 0px 1px 0px;
background-color: #0f0;
}
<div id="container">
<div class="block"></div>
<div class="block"></div>
<div class="block"></div>
</div>
When you use display:table-cell the browser looks for ancestor elements being display:table-row, display:table-row-group and display:table. If it can't find them, it creates pseudo elements to stand in for them. That's what's happening here.
So when you say display:table-cell; height:100%, that's 100% of the created pseudo element that is display:table. But that pseudo element is only as high as its content, and there's no way in CSS to say "make the pseudo-element have height that's 100% the height of its parent instead".
But it is possible to have a real element be display:table and set its height to 100%, in which case the browser will use that and not create the display:table pseudo element.
Applying display:table-cell; and height at the same time rarely gives the results you'd expect. I see that you're trying to use vertical-align which is probably why you added the table-cell. Try css positioning instead:
Remove display:table-cell; and vertical-align from your container.
Add height:100%; to both the body and html elements so your container has room to grow.
Set the container to position:relative; which will make it the origin of all positioned children rather than the document root (body tag). This will allow you to move your container around without screwing up the child positions.
Add a wrapper around your blocks (you could use ul, li for this rather than divs).
Position the block container as position:absolute; bottom:0;
Here's the code...
#container {
height: 100%;
width: 10px;
padding: 1px;
background-color: #00f;
position:relative;
}
.blockContainer
{
position:absolute;
bottom:0px;
}
.block {
height: 10px;
width: 10px;
margin: 1px 0px 1px 0px;
background-color: #0f0;
}
body { height:100% }
html { height: 100%}#container {
height: 100%;
width: 10px;
padding: 1px;
background-color: #00f;
position:relative;
}
.blockContainer
{
position:absolute;
bottom:0px;
}
.block {
height: 10px;
width: 10px;
margin: 1px 0px 1px 0px;
background-color: #0f0;
}
body { height:100% }
html { height: 100%}
...and here's the fiddle...
https://jsfiddle.net/kPEnL/1/
I'm unable to provide assistance with doing it in the way you have started, but taking your original big picture of trying to make a vertical progressbar, here's an alternative which uses the progressbar in Twitter Bootstrap. In its existing form, it doesn't do vertical progress bars, but this modification does.
I originally suggested using stacked bars, but this doesn't work with the vertical implementation. Instead, I've got a solution which uses CSS gradients to draw the blocks in, but still uses the normal bootstrap progress bar.
.progress.discrete {
background-image: linear-gradient(0deg,
black 0%, green 5%, green 95%, black 100%);
background-size: 100% 10%;
background-repeat: repeat-y;
}
/* Bar is used to cover up the blocks, so make it look like a background */
.progress.discrete .bar {
background-image: linear-gradient(to right, #f5f5f5, #f9f9f9);
}
I assumed you wanted your blocks to be a percentage of the bar height rather than an absolute size - this means I can't apply the gradient to the bar. Instead, it can be applied to the background, and the bar used to cover it up (i.e. set width of the bar to 100-progress%). I've also included an example which uses a fixed block size applied to the bar if that's what you wanted.
http://jsfiddle.net/BHTXZ/3/
It needs a little tidying up, but does the trick.

Text Alignment in CSS3 Triangle

I'm having trouble styling text within a div, which is in the shape of a triangle. All done with CSS.
The triangle is currently positioned absolutely as it needs to be for a larger project (I've removed the code from the larger project as it's irrelevant).
Here is a jsFiddle
See the code below:
HTML
<div>Here is a Triangle</div>
CSS
div {
text-align: center;
color: #fff;
font-size: 1.125em;
width: 100%;
}
div:nth-child(1) {
position: absolute;
top: 100px;
left: 100px;
width: 0;
height: 0;
border-left: 126px solid transparent;
border-right: 126px solid transparent;
border-bottom: 126px solid #D30000;
}
since the div has zero width, there will be a line break between each pair of words.
A solution might be to create the shape with one element, and have the text in another one.
You need to realise the triangle is actually a very thick border of a 0x0 element located at the top vertex, and position accordingly.
Here I've positioned the text at the baseline of the triangle and made its width from one vertex of the base to the other. Feel free to play with the text element's size to avoid the text overflowing the triangle. I'm afraid, however, that you can't just let the text flow inside a triangular shape:
HTML:
<div class="triangle"><div class="text">Here is a Triangle</div></div>
CSS:
div { /*your original CSS*/ }
div.triangle { /* your original CSS for div:nth-child(1) */ }
div.text {
position: absolute;
bottom: -126px; /* baseline */
left: -126px; /* left tip */
right: -126px; /* right tip */
width: auto; /* reset width:100% from div */
height: auto; /* just in case */
}
http://jsfiddle.net/honnza/UPeCf/8/

How can I create a line after my text to the width of the container?

Yes, I'm a newb so please go easy. I know there's got to be several ways to accomplish this. Basically I've been trying to come up with a consistent way to have a header with a line after the text that will run to the full width of a container element.
Something like this:
This is my header _______________________________________________________ |<- end container
This is another header __________________________________________________ |<- end container
I'm trying to create a .line class that will use bottom-border to create the line but I've been unsuccessful at creating a variable length line that will extend the full width of the container.
Here's what I've tried:
CSS:
.line
{
display:inline-block;
border-bottom:2px #5B3400 solid;
margin-left:5px;
width:80%;
}
HTML:
<h2>Our Mission<span class="line"></span></h2>
Of course this only gives me a line 80% of the container from the left border including the width of the text. How can I create a line that begins after the text and runs the full width of the border regardless of how much text is on the same line?
I know this should be easy but I haven't been able to find a solution yet.
Thanks!
THIS METHOD WILL WORK WITH TEXTURED BACKGROUNDS (background images):
You can try using this method instead, if your <h2> is on top of a background image.
HTML:
<h2 class="line-title"><span>This is my title</span><hr /></h2>
CSS:
.line-title {
font-size: 20px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
padding-top: 1px; /* Allows for hr margin to start at top of h2 */
}
/* clearfix for floats */
.line-title:after {
content: "";
display: table;
clear: both;
}
.line-title span {
padding-right: 10px;
float: left;
}
.line-title hr {
border:1px solid #DDD;
border-width: 1px 0 0 0;
margin-top: 11px;
}
See the working example here: http://jsfiddle.net/yYBDD/1/
How it Works:
the <h2> tag acts as a container for a floated element.
the <span> is floated left, causing the <hr /> to collapse to the left and fill the right space.
the <hr /> acts as the line, and fills up the remaining space to the right.
THIS METHOD WILL WORK WITH SOLID BACKGROUND COLORS:
HTML:
<h2 class="line-title"><span>This is my title</span></h2>
CSS:
.line-title {
border-bottom: 1px solid #DDD;
font-size: 20px;
height: 12px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
.line-title span {
background: #FFF;
padding-right: 10px;
}
You can see a working example here: http://jsfiddle.net/yYBDD/
How it works.
the <h2> tag has a class that sets the height to half of the height of the text it contains.
the <h2> has a bottom border, that extends to the width of it's parent container (since it's a block element).
the <span> inside of the <h2> has a white background, which will cover the area where the text and border overlap.
And finally, the <h2>> has a bottom margin, that compensates for the reduced height of the <h2>.
You could use flexbox to do this.
http://jsfiddle.net/eHHep/ (prefixes not included)
<h1 class="lineme">This is my header</h1>
<h2 class="lineme">This is another header</h2>
.lineme {
display: flex;
}
.lineme:after {
display: block;
content: " ";
border-bottom: 1px solid;
flex: 1 1 auto;
}
Advantages over other methods:
No extra markup required
Background color is not required
Down side:
Support for flexbox is low due to IE10 being the first IE to support it (see http://caniuse.com/#search=flexbox)
Your line goes away if your text wraps around
HTML:
<h2><span>Our Mission</span></h2>
CSS:
h2{
border-bottom: 1px solid #000;
height: 20px;
overflow: visible;
display: block;
width: 100%;
}
h2 span{
display: inline-block;
background: #fff;
height: 21px;
}
This way it'll overflow on the bottom border as it has bigger height.
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/afuzk/
Here's something I tried and that worked:
HTML
<h2>Our Mission</h2>
CSS
h2:after
{
content: "\00a0";
border-bottom: solid 2px black;
position: fixed;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
margin-left: 3px;
}
The JS Bin to test: http://jsbin.com/ayuvuc/4

Keeping/scaling DIV Ratio with percentages

At the moment I have a layout that pulls a number of thumbnails into a grid - each is defined by a style that keeps them a fixed ratio, (roughly 16:9) which is defined by pixel dimensions (389px x 230px) but they are looking a bit small on high-res screens.
The images are actually pulled into the DIV as a background that covers 100% width and height of the DIV and then the DIV's obviously control the aspect and size.
What I am looking to do is have these DIV's dynamically resize based on the page size of the device but to keep the ratio of the DIV's.
Is this possible?
My thoughts would be to set the width based on the percentage of the page but then I'm not sure how I would set the height and keep the correct aspect ratio (due to different resolutions etc.)
What would be the best way to do this?
EDIT - Thanks for all your ideas so far, thought maybe I should show you how I'm pulling in the data at the moment.
In my HTML I've got the following code which generated the grid
<a class="griditem" href="../video.php?video=13" style="background-image:url(../video/Relentless/Relentless.jpg); background-size:100% 100%;">
<div class="titles">
<h5>Relentless Short Stories</h5>
<h6>Frank Turner: The Road</h6>
</div>
This is styled with the following CSS
.griditem {
position: relative;
float: left;
margin-right: 17px;
margin-bottom: 17px;
background-color: #777;
-webkit-box-shadow: 0 1px 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5);
-moz-box-shadow: 0 1px 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5);
box-shadow: 0 1px 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5);
-webkit-border-radius: 2px;
-moz-border-radius: 2px;
border-radius: 2px;
width: 389px;
height: 230px;
text-align: left;
}
.titles {
padding: 5px;
position: absolute;
bottom: 10px;
left: -1px;
right: -1px;
background: transparent url(../images/layout/white80.png) top left;
-moz-border-radius: 1px 1px 0 0;
border-radius: 1px 1px 0 0;
text-align: left;
}
The reason I'm implementing it this way is so that the Div can float over the bottom of the image.
Just a quick idea which might be useful for you.
It is based on the fact that vertical padding/margin use the WIDTH of the parent box when it is set to percentages, so it is possible to resize a div relative its parent box
http://jsfiddle.net/xExuQ/2/
body,html { height:100%; }
.fixed-ratio-resize {
width: 50%; /* child width = parent width * percent */
padding-bottom: 50%; /* child height = parent width * percent */
height: 0; /* well, it is not perfect :) */
}
​If you want to put some (non-background) content into this nicely resized box, then put an absolutely positioned div inside it.
Reference:
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/box.html#margin-properties and
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/box.html#padding-properties says:
Margins: "The percentage is calculated with respect to the width of the generated box's containing block. Note that this is true for 'margin-top' and 'margin-bottom' as well. If the containing block's width depends on this element, then the resulting layout is undefined in CSS 2.1."
Paddings:"The percentage is calculated with respect to the width of the generated box's containing block, even for 'padding-top' and 'padding-bottom'. If the containing block's width depends on this element, then the resulting layout is undefined in CSS 2.1."
EDIT
http://jsfiddle.net/mszBF/6/
HTML:
<a class="griditem" href="#" style="background-image: url(http://pic.jpg);">
<span class="titles">
<span class="name">Unicomp Studios</span>
<span class="title">Springs Buckling (2012)</span>
</span>
</a>
CSS:
.griditem {
float: left;
margin-right: 17px;
margin-bottom: 17px;
min-width: 100px; /* extremely narrow blocks ==> crap looking */
width: 30%;
background: blue no-repeat;
background-size: contain; /* from IE9 only: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/background-size */
border: 1px solid transparent; /* prevent .titles:margin-top's margin collapse */
}
.titles {
/* <a> elements must only have inline elements like img, span.
divs, headers, etc are forbidden, because some browsers will display a big mess (safari) */
display: block; /* so display those inline elements as blocks */
padding: 5px;
margin: 0 auto;
margin-top: 105%;
background: yellow;
}
.titles > span {
display: block;
}​
I know this might not be the best solution, but
<html>
<style type="text/css">
#cool{
width:40%;
background:blue;
padding-bottom:10%;
}
</style>
<div id="cool" >
</div>
</html>
Here Ive used padding-bottom, to maintain its height relative to its width. U can set padding-bottom as a percentage. Hope this helped.

Resources