Im trying to make a div fill out the correct amount, corresponding to the text within it. This is normal behaviour with divs, but when adding position:relative and absolute theres trouble.
<div style="position:relative;background-color:#CDCDCD;">
<div style="position:absolute;top:0px;left:0px;">sadasd</div>
</div>
Its simple, i just want the background color to fill as long as the text goes. Setting a width is not an option.
I've tried with width:auto and display:block but I cant get it to work.
<div style="position:relative;">
<div style="position:absolute;top:0px;left:0px;background-color:#CDCDCD;">sadasd</div>
</div>
Just move the background-color to the inner div, that will do the job!
Related
Hello i used Bootstrap and my 2 div col-md-6 and col-md-6 are not in align in height.
Use this css for the first div.
div.col-md-6 {
display: inline-block;
vertical-align:middle;
}
The simplest way to align vertical align here is to add padding from top in the first div.Your second div have buttons and must be having padding also.
Use min-height for both using class to div. It will solve your query.
eg:
<div class="col-md-6 mycol">
</div>
<div class="col-md-6 mycol">
</div>
style.css
.mycol{
min-height:100px;
}
Without the code, it's hard to find the cause, but I guess your two div are without a css height property and then adapt to their content.
The div on the right contains items that seems to have a padding on top and bottom, resulting in an item with a greatest height than the one on the left.
Your two div are aligned on the top and as it's already been mentionned you need to add the same padding on the left and right cols (I don't like the vertical align answer, as it work in this case, but could cause issues as the cols height could change).
If you dont have a scenario where you text will wrap to the next line, you can use line-height which will be same for both the sections.
http://www.clickityclick.me/HarcourtV3/index.html
I have applied a background colour to my footer which will not display correctly.
At the smaller screen sizes (<992px) the background colour displays as expected. At the larger sizes it does not display, except for in the padding portion at the top of the div.
I have tried:
setting the footer element as having a background colour (footer {background-color:...})
setting the containing div as having a background colour (#fatFooter {background-color:...})
applying a background colour class to the containing div (.grnBG {background-color:...})
using !important in all cases above
Any suggestions at this stage welcome.
Adding overflow: hidden to both your footer and the #fatFooter div will solve the issue. Simply add this CSS to your stylesheet:
footer, #fatFooter {
overflow: hidden;
}
You need to add clearfix to #fatFooter like this :)
<div id="fatFooter" class="VerPad0015 clearfix">
<div class="col-md-3 col-sm-6 clearfix">
(just after the <div id="#fatFooter">
This adds FLOAT:LEFT.
remove it and everything will be fine
How can I achieve the following layout? Specifically the positioning of Image and DIV
I've found that unless I set a specific width for the Div, it will just go on to the next line and take up the full width of the container. Additionally aligning it relative to the bottom of the image is giving me trouble. Currently they're both float:left
Edit: The two solutions so far work if the image is a constant width which I guess I could work with, but it's going in a Wordpress theme for an author's profile page and it's possible that images would have slightly variable widths. Is there a solution that would have the Div right next to the image (minus padding) regardless of how wide or narrow the image is? Basically having the div adjust its width to accommodate the image width.
Tested in IE7/8, Firefox, Chrome.
Live Demo #2
CSS:
#container{width:80%; padding:12px; margin:0 auto}
#top{position:relative;overflow:auto}
#top img{float:left; background:red; width:100px; height:180px}
#header{position:absolute; bottom:0; right:0}
#content{height:200px}
JS/jQuery:
$('#header').css('margin-left', $('#top img').width() + 10);
(you might want to change the + 10 for parseInt($('#top img').css('margin-right'), 10))
HTML:
<div id="container">
<div id="top">
<img src="" />
<div id="header">Some text here that should wrap to fit on row. Some text here that should wrap to fit on row. Some text here that should wrap to fit on row. Some text here that should wrap to fit on row. </div>
</div>
<div id="content">dfgdfg</div>
</div>
I'd put the header image and header div inside its own container and position the items within it using absolute positioning.
I've put together a quick sample here: http://jsfiddle.net/JjxYj/1/
Notice here that if you remove the width of the Div in the header, it will become the width of its content.
Update
To answer the updated part of the question, here's another solution that'll allow the image to be of any width whilst still positioning the header text at the bottom of its containing item: http://jsfiddle.net/JjxYj/5/
In this example http://jsbin.com/inoka4 no width is defined for parent element
if i want to wrap red boxes in container border.
then we can make this in 5 ways
to giving float also to <div class="container">
overflow:hidden or overflow:auto
any clearfix hack to <div class="container clearfix">
Giving height to <div class="container">
adding one more html element (for example another div or <br >) after 2
boxes in <div class="container"> enter code hereand give
clear:leftor:bothor:right` to that
element
my question is any other option except float do not make any changes in <div class="container"> and inner boxes width. but if we use float:left or right to parent box then it's shrink the whole box and inner-boxes as well.
Why?
example link: http://jsbin.com/inoka4
Edit: My question is not about which method i should use, the question is why Float shrink the width
I think the better option is to use overflow:hidden. It is a simple one line change and it works.
div#container {
...
overflow: hidden;
}
Adding extra divs for clear fix requires changes in html for something that is really css. Alternatively, when using clear fix by doing hacks like...
div:after {
content:....
...
}
your css just gets bigger and messier. But it still is a good option (especially when you need to have things that overflow the box)
Reference:
http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/html-css-techniques/css-fudamentals-containing-children/
If you dont' use float on the container it's width is set to 100%. If you add a floating, it only takes the space it needs. In this case the width is calculated by the two divs inside.
To wrap the red boxes in the container border there is not other option except adding float to the container. The only other option would be to absolutely position all the elements but in this case you have to know the width and height of all elements in advance. So that really isn't an option.
So my advice is to use float on the container and add a clear: both on the element after the container.
Your best bet is to always clear your floats. Just after you close the div with class .right, and just before you close the div with class .container, add a new div like this:
<div class="clear"></div>
.clear is just {clear:both;} in your stylesheet. That's what I use all day long, and works like a treat.
The final markup would be:
<div class="container">
<div class="left"> ... </div>
<div class="right"> ... </div>
<div class="clear"></div>
</div>
Edit: Just like your last example, apparently. :)
I am trying to build a page with the following in it:
Already have the following:
one div for page to center the whole page with width 809px
inside <div class="page"> is the following:
<div class="header">
<div class="container"> (container for content stuff)
<div class="footer">
What I am struggling with:
<div class="container"> should contain the following:
leftmost <div class="leftShadow"> with 100% height to container, with left shadow image as background for <div class="leftShadow">
second to left <div class="custom_content"> with 100% height to container (will contain content of page
second to right <div class="sidebar_right"> with 100% height to container (will contain extra links)
rightmost <div class="rightShadow"> with 100% height to container, with right shadow image as background for <div class="rightShadow">
So to summarise:
<div class="page">
<div class="header">header image</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="leftShadow"><img src="images/spacer.gif" alt="" /></div>
<div class="custom_content">(this is where the content would be)</div>
<div class="sidebar_right">(some other links)</div>
<div class="rightShadow"><img src="images/spacer.gif" alt="" /></div>
</div>
So what is supposed to happen is, when either custom_content or sidebar_right div's strength in length below the other, the other one would stretch in height to be the same with as the longer div. Obviously, both side div's (leftShadow and rightShadow) should also stretch to 100% of the container's height.
Can someone please guide me in the right direction? Basically, these div's should behave much like a table would when one td's content stretches beyond the height of the other td's.
Don't use divs like tables!
The leftShadow and rightShadow divs are completely unnecessary. Combine your background images into a single image and set it as the background of your container div.
To make sure the background image fills the height of the container, set background-repeat: repeat-y.
Why not use something like "Faux Columns"?
See http://www.alistapart.com/articles/fauxcolumns/
Perhaps you won't need the leftShadow and rightShadow divs: take a look at faux columns.
This is what you are looking for, I hope. :)
I'd do this differently because you're not going to get your divs to behave like tables.
I'm not entirely sure what you're wanting this to look like, but I'm guess you want some sort of shadow image down the left and right side of the container div. How about removing the leftShadow and rightShadow divs, put a repeatable background image on the content div of width 809px (and maybe height 1, depending on what your shadow image looks like). Also perhaps set overflow:hidden on the content div - if I remember rightly thats a kind of hack which will make the containing div stretch in this situation.