I have a very strange from when testing a website on Chrome.
The CSS is exactly the same but appears different. Plus tested on the same monitor.
Firefox
Chrome
You can see from the Chrome print screen the background image I am using for the knives/forks, its the background color of this image which changes.
The background image at http://www.cater-shawrecruitment.co.uk/webapp/templates/default/images/bgpage.jpg has an embedded colour profile, which different browsers will interpret differently. You'll need to re-render the image without the embedded colour profile.
This is probably caused by using photoshop to simply 'Save' the JPG, rather than 'Save for web'ing.
Chances are, your image has a color profile applied, and thus is being rendered differently in Chrome and Firefox, which only the former of these two will actually respect it. Reading off of Chris Coiyer's article on web color profiles, you can fix the problem by doing as follows:
If you "Save As..." from the file menu, you will have the opportunity to save your color profile along with the image. If you "Save for Web & Devices..." the "sRGB" (best for the web) color profile will be automatically applied (in CS3 anyway).
this is something to do with colorprofiles.
this might help - Image color differences in different browsers. (Firefox, Chrome, IE)
and this
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=143
check your colorprofiles in photoshop (cmd+shift+k) and try to recreate the image. should work.
If you change the image to be png it will be the same color. The reason is in the link of #Nightfirecat and in #graphicdivine 's answer.
Related
I'm displaying this image on a website, however Chrome seems to be adjusting the brightness or saturation (not sure the exact term). I've only run into this problem recently, this image was displaying on Chrome correctly however some recent changes in Chrome must have changed that.
I've done a quick test with browsers and here are the results:
Chrome Desktop (64.0.3282.186): Broken
Chrome Mobile: Broken
Opera: Working
Edge: Working
Raw image can be found here: https://imgur.com/a/3TLlc
Here's a side by side comparison between Chrome (left) and Edge.
Could anyone tell me the cause of this? Or perhaps point me in the right direction?
I think that your image is in CMYK (print) color mode. Chrome renders its colors differently.
Try to open the image with an editor (for example: Photoshop, Gimp 2), set the color mode to RGB (if the editor doesn't do that by default), and save it (or export it) with the same extension, .jpg. This works for me.
If your colors are changing a little bit, that is because of the conversion to RGB.
Google Chrome always seems to be changing the color of an image that I'm trying to match to a background color. I tried saving it in Photoshop and GIMP and even adjusted the color settings in each but it doesn't help in Chrome. FF and IE work fine (for once).
The color of my image is #282828. After I saved it as a PNG, I reopened it in both GIMP and Photoshop and used the eyedropper tool to confirm that the color was still #282828. When it renders in Chrome it's darker. I have a div with a background color of #282828, and the image is right next to it. I took a screen shot and the div's background color was #282828 and the images background color was #1d1d1d. I tried this for several different colors and each has had the same result. I even tried making the source image the color Chrome was rendering it as but Chrome still changes it. So for example, since Chrome was changing #282828 to #1d1d1d, I made the source image #1d1d1d, and when I rendered it in Chrome it was not #1d1d1d, but some other darker color.
At this point, I'm looking for either a fix or a programmatic work-around. Because the image is transparent, has curves, and a drop-shadow, there's really no way for me to avoid replacing the it, or even parts of it, with html.
Update:
I also tried saving it as a jpg and gif. gif actually works but can't preserve the drop shadow. The image I'm using is attached. If I take a screenshot of this in Chrome, GIMP's eyedropper tool says it's #1d1d1d. If I open the original and do the same, it's #282828.
PNG uses gamma correction to try to ensure that the image looks kinda the same across all monitors, and this can cause color mismatches like the one you're seeing. It's a combination of image editor issues and browser issues: image editors are not forced to embed gamma data inside images, and browsers are free to ignore the gamma correction if it's there and free to enforce some at random when it's not there. In this case, I'd rather think that Firefox ignores it.
Use a transparent PNG if you don't want its background to interfere with your page's background.
[EDIT] For your specific case, you may be able to replicate the graphics you're looking for by styling elements, using border-radius and box-shadow, two widely-implemented CSS3 properties that reasonably decay on older browsers.
I have a div with the property:
background-color: #327EB2;
When I open the page on a browser I notice that a different color is shown. If I capture the screen and open the captured image on Photoshop, I can see that the color code captured is actually #437BB6. I have nothing set with that color in my CSS stylesheet.
I've tested on different monitors, different color resolutions, different browsers and versions from FF 4+ to IE8+, Opera, Chrome, Safari, etc...
Actually I don't think that's a problem of the monitor, resolution or browser version, because the problem is that the code of the shown color is actually a totally different one!
Also, Photoshop warns me about #327EB2 which is not a "Web Safe color", but I don't think this is the problem because I often use non-websafe colors in my sheets and I've never had an issue like that.
** Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/286tE/
*UPDATE
The problem is that the div has a background image and a background-color. The background color has to match the last pixel's color of the background image (as usual), which is #327EB2.
Anyway, I can see a different color from the last pixel of the image to the background-color:
http://test.testblueday.eu/test/cbsissue.png
You can see the page here, the problem is shown after the "Top Marchi" list on the left side:
http://test.testblueday.eu/test/cbstest.html
I've left the plain CSS and JS (not compressed) to let you see all the properties.
** UPDATE 2
I use Mac, but we can see the problem also on Windows.
You problem has nothing to do with the CSS, the problem is in the image!
This is because the examples supplied by you show the correct #327EB2 at the extra background (the one "coloured" via CSS), and that is enough to know that the CSS part is ok.
Beware of colour corrections/management done in the file exported via Photoshop.
If you can't colour manage/revert to the desired colour, another solution is doing the opposite, change the CSS colour to match the last row of the image.
As far as I can see, everything works correctly. Your image at the bottom has color with code '#1080b3' - I just downloaded that picture (gradient_box_emboss.jpg) and took a color with colorpicker in GIMP. When I modify css like this:
.embosser {
background: #1080B3 url('/images/gradient_box_emboss.jpg') right top no-repeat;
color: white;
padding: 5px 6px;
}
Difference is missing. When I printscreen your site and paste it into GIMP, color picker shows color of that "wrong" background is #327eb2. When I open your image you have in your question, color of background is #307db7. It is in jpg and I suppose some color information were lost while compressing raw data to .jpg. Possibly, something similar happens when you are trying to get color in photoshop.
Possibly problem rise when you convert images from one format to another. Simplest fix is above - change color of background to one you have on your image.
I am having an issue with Firefox rendering a few of the .png's that I have loaded into a Wordpress blog that I am preparing for a client. The images look fine in IE 8 & 9, and chrome, but it looks very off in Mozilla. I was informed by our other UX guy that Firefox complies with embedded color profiles that may warp the tint of your image. You can view the tint shift by going to :
http://blog.hendrickspower.com
If anybody has any idea of how to over ride the color profile, I'd definitely appreciate the heads up!
Thanks
Here is an image that shows the difference that I am seeing.
alt http://s11.postimage.org/jbnzek4g3/color_embed.jpg
The difference in rendering is due to an ICC color profile embedded in the image. When Firefox finds a color profile it will combine it with the color profile of the display and adjust image rendering accordingly. This will normally make sure that the image is displayed the same on different displays. However, it might also cause undesired effects if the display profile is incorrect.
At least Windows 7 allows you to calibrate display colors. Not sure whether this feature was also present in earlier Windows versions but they definitely allowed selecting a color profile file in the advanced display settings - you could replace the driver-supplied profile by sRGB.
If you absolutely don't want different image display on different computers then you should just remove the color profile from the image with a tool like jStrip and pngcrush.
like
img { background-color:color: color matched to the theme}
or
img { background-image:url (a very very tiny gif image with the text "image loading") }
I'm thinking in the benefit of this when user access site on slow connection then background color will give clue about something is there which is diffrent than text content..
It's certainly a good approach. I would however try to assign as much as possible the same background color to the background as the strongest color of the actual background image. This way the website will still be representative whenever the client has disabled all images (as some bandwidth-limited users do or some handhelds by default do) or when its browser doesn't support images. The Web Developer Toolbar is helpful in this, in the Images menu you can choose to hide images so that you can see how it would look like without (background) images. I however wouldn't put a loading gif in. You can however consider to save the image interlaced (supported on GIF and PNG).
Sure, if you want to. In most browsers a space in which an image will load is already indicated, but there's nothing stopping you from doing a background color too if you like. I typically see this on body tags or other block-level tags that have background images, but I suppose you could do it on an image itself too.
In all honesty, I don't think this will actually make a site more usable than one that lacks this "feature."
An image-heavy site will probably look awful with a 'loading' background image, but if your site is not full of pictures, go ahead.
A small loading image is a nice touch, such as those from http://www.ajaxload.info/