I want to increase the stack size of an ipad application to 16MB .I have done it in xcode build setting "-WI-stack_size 1000000 to the Other Linker Flags field ".
but getting build error of
i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1: stack_size: No such file or directory
i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1: 1000000: No such file or directory
How can i resolve that ?
Do not know if you got it solved or not, but the correct way to indicate such option to the linker (according to this site) is to add -Wl,-stack_size,1000000 to the Other Linker Flags field of the Build Styles pane. You are missing the commas.
In case you are using clang or gcc the cli would be:
g++ -Wl,-stack_size -Wl,1000000
Hope it helps.
If you think you need to increase the stack size you're almost certainly doing something very wrong in your code, like allocating way too large objects on the stack (ie a 16 MByte C array).
Instead, allocate the memory or use the proper Objective-C data structures (ie NSMutableArray).
Related
I have a C++ library and it has a few of C++ static objects. The library could suffer from C++ static initialization fiasco. I'm trying to vet unforeseen translation unit dependencies by randomizing the order of the *.o files during a build.
I visited 2.3 How make Processes a Makefile in the GNU manual and it tells me:
Goals are the targets that make strives ultimately to update. You can override this behavior using the command line (see Arguments to Specify the Goals) ...
I also followed to 9.2 Arguments to Specify the Goals, but a treatment was not provided. It did not surprise me.
Is it possible to have Make randomize its goals? If so, then how do I do it?
If not, are there any alternatives? This is in a test environment, so I have more tools available to me than just GNUmake.
Thanks in advance.
This is really implementation-defined, but GNU Make will process targets from left to right.
Say you have an OBJS variable with the objects you want to randomize, you could write something like (using e.g. shuf):
RAND_OBJS := $(shell shuf -e -- $(OBJS))
random_build: $(RAND_OBJS)
This holds as long as you're not using parallel make (-j option). If you are the order will still be randomized, but it will also depend on number of jobs, system load, current phase of the moon, etc.
Next release of GNU make will have --shuffle mode. It will allow you to execute prerequisites in random order to shake out missing dependencies by running $ make --shuffle.
The feature was recently added in https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?62100 and so far is available only in GNU make's git tree.
So I've been playing with Ada for some time, it's an awesome language, but I can't figure out how to make executables smaller (I'm using GNAT 5.3 on windows). Currently, file size of hello world is about 800 kb. When i strip debugging info it becomes ~222 kb. Any ideas how to make it smaller?
Ada.Text_IO is featureful. If you don’t need all its capabilities, try GNAT.IO; on Mac OS X (FSF GCC 5.1), the unstripped executable went down from 360816 bytes to 166356, stripped from 192200 to 83540.
Another thing: for some reason, GNAT doesn’t use shared libraries (DLLs) unless you tell it to. Forcing dynamic linking (gnatmake -O2 hello -bargs -shared) reduced the Ada.Text_IO version to 17520 bytes (14304 stripped), and the GNAT.IO version to 13976 bytes (11888 stripped).
I don't think it is very meaningful to get a minimum size hello world program in Ada.
Ada's run time does have a bigger payload than C's.
Here is a discussion on it:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.ada/1zvvW0Mw5Bw
If you're just interested in making the "Hello World" executable smaller, you could import write() and use that instead of Ada.Text_IO.
FYI: Standard Hello World on GNU/Hurd with its setup of gnatmake is around 16kB. Stripped around 8.5kB. No fancy tricks but probably gnat.adc with restrictions.
In the days when size was an issue, I occasionally used UPX. I believe it's still around.
I'm making a Turbo Pascal 7.0 program for my class, it has to be on Graphic Mode.
A message pops up
BGI Error: Graphics not initialized (use InitGraph).
I'm already using InitGraph and graph.tpu and I specified the route as "C:\TP7\BGI".
My S.O is Windows 7 and I'm using DosBox 0.74, I already tried to paste all the files from the folder BGI into BIN.
What should I do?
Since dos doesn't have system graphic drivers, the BGI functions as such for BP7.
So in short, use a BGI suitable for your videocard. The ones supplied with BP7 are very old, there are newer, VESA ones that you could try.
Afaik 3rd party BGI needs to be registered explicitly in code though.
At first I have had this "missing Graph.tpu"- ... and later the "Use Initgraph"-issue too.
After hours trying (and reading some not politeful comments in the internet) I finally got Turbo Pascal 7 succesfully running (in Windows 10, x64). In summary I want to share "some secrets":
install the "TP(WDB)-7.3.5-Setup.msi" (comes from clever people in Vietnam)
make sure, that there's the CORRECT PATH to the "BGI"-directory in your program-code. For example:
driver := Detect;
InitGraph (driver, modus, 'c:\TPWDB\BGI');
(By the way: This is ALL, what's there to do with "Initgraph".)
make sure, that in TP7 under "Options" --> "Directories" are the CORRECT PATHS both to "C:\TPWDB\UNITS" and Your actual working dir e.g. "C:\TPWDB\myPrograms"
THAT's IT.
Annotations: The "Graph.TPU" (usually) is already in "UNITS" (together with "Graph3.tpu" by the way).
Hazzling around old driver's isn't needed even... :)
Just the correct paths... :)
Hope, that can help ...
Is there a way to set the compiler warnings to be interpreted as an error in the Arduino IDE?
Or any generic way to set GCC compiler options?
I have looked at the ~/.arduino/preferences.txt file, but I found nothing that indicates fine-tuned control. I also looked if I could set GCC options via environment variables, but I did not find anything.
I don't want to have verbose compiler output (which you can specify using the IDE) that is way too much distracting non-essential information, and I don't want to waste my time on reading through it.
I want for a compilation to stop on a warning, so code can be cleaned up. My preference would be to be able to set -Werror= options, but a generic -Werror will do for the small code size of .ino projects.
Addendum:
Based on the suggestion in the selected answer, I implemented an avr-g++ script and put that in the path before the normal avr-g++. For that I changed the Arduino command as follows:
-export PATH="${APPDIR}/java/bin:${PATH}"
+export ORGPATH="${APPDIR}/java/bin:${PATH}"
+export PATH="${APPDIR}/extra:${ORGPATH}"
And in the new directory extra in the APPSDIR (where the Arduino command is located), I have
an avr-g++ which is a Python script:
#!/usr/bin/env python
import os
import sys
import subprocess
werr = '-Werror'
wall = '-Wall'
cmd = ['avr-g++'] + sys.argv[1:]
os.environ['PATH'] = os.environ['ORGPATH']
fname = sys.argv[-2][:]
if cmd[-2].startswith('/tmp'):
#print fname, list(fname) # this looks strange
for i, c in enumerate(cmd):
if c == '-w':
cmd[i] = wall
break
cmd.insert(1, werr)
subprocess.call(cmd)
So you replace the first command with the original compiler name and reset the environment used to exclude the extra directory.
The fname is actually strange. If you print it, it is only abc.cpp, but its length is much larger and it actually starts with /tmp. So I check for that to decide whether to add/update the compile options.
It looks like you are on Linux. Arduino is a script, so you can set PATH in the script to include a directory at the beginning to a directory containing a program, avr-g++. Then the Java stuff should take the compiler from there, should it not?
That program then calls the normal /usr/bin/avr-g++ with the extra options.
One option you have is to compile your sketches from the command line. Take a look at this makefile.
I am looking for a working distribution of SQLite for OpenVMS. I tried building SQLite 3.7.9 from the amalgamation file, using patches I found in a mailing list, but it does not quite work.
I am using HP C V7.1-015 on OpenVMS Alpha 7.3-2.
Since I cannot install python, which seems to include SQLite3, I have to build from sources.
I compile using the following commands:
$ CC /OPTIMIZE -
/DEFINE=(SQLITE_THREADSAFE=0, -
SQLITE_OMIT_LOAD_EXTENSION=1, -
SQLITE_OMIT_COMPILEOPTION_DIAGS=1, -
SQLITE_OMIT_MEMORYDB=1, -
SQLITE_OMIT_TEMPDB=1, -
SQLITE_OMIT_DEPRECATED=1, -
SQLITE_OMIT_SHARED_CACHE=1, -
_USE_STD_STAT=ENABLE) -
/FLOAT=IEEE_FLOAT -
sqlite3.c
$ CC /OPTIMIZE -
/DEFINE=(SQLITE_THREADSAFE=0, -
SQLITE_OMIT_LOAD_EXTENSION=1, -
SQLITE_OMIT_COMPILEOPTION_DIAGS=1, -
SQLITE_OMIT_MEMORYDB=1, -
SQLITE_OMIT_TEMPDB=1, -
SQLITE_OMIT_DEPRECATED=1, -
SQLITE_OMIT_SHARED_CACHE=1, -
_USE_STD_STAT=ENABLE) -
/FLOAT=IEEE_FLOAT -
shell.c
I copied the defines from the mailing list, and added /FLOAT=IEEE_FLOAT to get rid of most warnings regarding floating points (related to overflows due to exponent 308).
During compilation I got some informationals and warnings.
I get the following messages while linking:
$ LINK shell.obj,sqlite3.obj
...
%LINK-W-NUDFSYMS, 2 undefined symbols:
%LINK-I-UDFSYM, __STD_FSTAT
%LINK-I-UDFSYM, __STD_STAT
...
Since I am a little bit lost here, I rather have SQLite3 sources which compile on OpenVMS.
The specific problem you're getting from the linker arises from the fact that you've requested capability at compile time that your system doesn't have. I believe the _USE_STD_STAT option first became available in OpenVMS v8.2, yet you're on 7.3-2. Your compiler and your headers know what to do when _USE_STD_STAT is defined, but the functions to process the X/Open-compliant stat structure do not exist in the C run-time (CRTL in VMS parlance) on your system, and your linker is telling you, "ain't got those functions."
Ideally you would be able to upgrade your operating system. Current as of this writing is v8.4. v7.3-2 was released eight and a half years ago and v8.2 over seven years ago. I understand that there are technical, budgetary, and even political reason that upgrades aren't always possible. If it were me, and I were stuck on OpenVMS Alpha v7.3-2, I would try removing the _USE_STD_STAT=ENABLE from the compilation and see what blows up.
One of the side effects of enabling _USE_STD_STAT is that you also get _LARGEFILE along with it. If that's the only reason SQLite needs the option, you may be fine but limited to 4GB databases. I suspect there's more to it than that, i.e., SQLite very likely makes use of elements in the stat structure that do actually require the newer structure.
You can read up on the differences in the traditional and standards-compliant stat structures at http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/84final/5763/5763profile_062.html#index_x_1699.
I've recently improved my VMSish patch for SQLite and made it available for SQLite version 3.7.14.1: http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users#sqlite.org/msg73570.html (or http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/Building-SQLite-3-7-14-1-for-OpenVMS-td65277.html).
POSIX locking still doesn't work though, and I was unable to find out why.
Well, there was a message on the sqlite-users mailing list on getting SQLite 3.7.9 working on OpenVMS. I don't know how relevant that is to the version you've got (or if the patch was adopted by the SQLite developers; they're a bit picky for legal reasons IIRC) but it looks likely to be useful. Good luck.