I tried to change like that(worked on the 'navigator' object)
page->mainFrame()->evaluateJavaScript(
"var navigator=new Object;"
"navigator.someProperty=...");
In that case, I would use the signal javaScriptWindowObjectCleared
That kicks in just before load, when the window has been cleared.
You probably want to validate the origin before doing anything, though.
That being said - and I am not too sure what you want to achieve - I wouldn't manipulate the javascript scope like that. Maintaining and deploying javascript is easier than doing the same for C++. So, I would instead just expose a simple C++ object to the javascript scope (via addToJavaScriptWindowObject), and then have the javascript code test this object and do what it has to do.
Either way, hope this helps.
Related
How can I tell the Closure Compiler not to rename an inner function? E.g., given this code:
function aMeaninglessName() {
function someMeaningfulName() {
}
return someMeaningfulName;
}
...I'm fine with Closure renaming the outer function (I actively want it to, to save space), but I want the function name someMeaningfulName left alone (so that the name shown in call stacks for it is "someMeaningfulName", not "a" or whatever). This despite the fact that the code calling it will be doing so via the reference returned by the factory function, not by the name in the code. E.g., this is purely for debugging support.
Note that I want the function to have that actual name, not be anonymous and assigned to some property using that name, so for instance this is not a duplicate of this other question.
This somewhat obscure use case doesn't seem to be covered by either the externs or exports functionality. (I was kind of hoping there'd be some annotation I could throw at it.) But I'm no Closure Compiler guru, I'm hoping some of you are. Naturally, if there's just no way to do that, that's an acceptable answer.
(The use case is a library that creates functions in response to calls into it. I want to provide a version of the library that's been pre-compressed by Closure with SIMPLE_OPTIMIZATIONS, but if someone is using that copy of the library with their own uncompressed code and single-stepping into the function in a debugger [or other similar operations], I want them to see the meaningful name. I could get around it with eval, or manually edit the compressed result [in fact, the context is sufficiently unique I could throw a sed script at it], but that's awkward and frankly takes us into "not worth bothering" territory, hence looking for a simple, low-maintenance way.)
There is no simple way to do this. You would have to create a custom subclass of the CodingConvention class to indicate that your methods are "local" externs (support for this was added to handle the Prototype library). It is possible that InlineVariables, InlineFunctions, or RemoveUsedVariables will still try to remove the name and would also need to be fixed up.
Another approach is to use the source maps to remap the stack traces to the original source.
read the following section
https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler/docs/api-tutorial3#export
Two options basically, use object['functionName'] = obj.functionName or the better way
use exportSymbol and exportProperty both on the goog object, here is the docs link for that
http://closure-library.googlecode.com/svn/docs/closure_goog_base.js.html
-- edit
ah, i see now, my first answer is not so great for you. The compiler has some interesting flags, the one which might interest you is DEBUG, which you can pass variables into the compiler which will allow you to drop some debugging annotations in via logging or just a string which does nothing since you are using simple mode.
so if you are using closure you can debug against a development version which is just a page built with dependiencies resolved. we also the drop the following in our code
if(DEBUG){
logger.info('pack.age.info.prototype.func');
}
I have an observer to a value "App.selectedValue". I also have another Ember object that has a binding (App.someObj.appValueBinding) to App.selectedValue. However, when my observer is called, the binding of App.someObj is not updated.
This is illustrated in http://jsfiddle.net/Ur2Qj/8/
In the jsfiddle, you can see in the Chrome debugger or FireBug, that App.selectedValue and App.someObj.appValue have different values, even tho' the latter is bound to the former.
Seems like the binding should be updated when the observer is called. Is this expected behavior in Emberjs or is it a bug? Is there a work-around?
Thanks for looking at this!
Take a look at this: http://jsfiddle.net/ud3323/GUHCD/ (in JavaScript; I don't like CoffeeScript... sorry).
The two main things you've got wrong here is not using get() and set() properly and in your observer you need to set App.someController.content after the end of the current runloop (which means after all the other bindings have taken place). You do this by using Ember.run.next(). You could also use Ember.run.sync() there as well.
Oh and you need to use jQuery 1.7.1. Version 1.5.2 is not compatible with Ember.
In flex I want to do something similar to the following
var audioPlayerMock:AudioPlayer = AudioPlayer(mockRepository.createStub(mockRepository.createStub(AudioPlayer));
SetupResult.forCall(audioPlayerMock.play).(CALL_ACTUAL_PLAY_METHOD(WITH_ARGUMENT));
AudioPlayer has a lot of methods that I want stubbed, (so I use mockRepository.creatStub()). But there is one method, play(), that I want to call the actual actual method (super.play(argument) if my thinking is right). I'm not sure how to do this?
I know I can use createDynamic(AudioPlayer) then stub out every other method, but that is a bit tedious.
Cheers
You can use IMethodOptions.callOriginalMethod() to call the actual implementation on a stubbed class:
SetupResult.forCall(authatoPlayerMock.play(null))
.ignoreArguments()
.callOriginalMethod();
how come that when I attach onchange by attribute and call it
onchange="validateDate(FPR_CURR_FROM);"
it works, but when I use a ASP .NET validator, and my attached function is called like :
function anonymous() {
ValidatorOnChange(event);
validateDate(FPR_CURR_FROM);
}
I get error: FPR_CURR_FROM is undefined.
First off: I know that using FPR_CURR_FROM to access element is BAD, and I should use getElementByID etc... And I will change it eventually. But as I bumped into that code, I'm curious what caused it - propably visibility of variables I guess.
I think it's a scoping issue, yes, it would take seeing more code and how anonymous is called, but that is what it looks like to me from what I see... One way around that is to attach the FPR_CURR_FROM variable to the window object, and access it via window.FPR_CURR_FROM...
I am working with a pretty complicated .aspx page that is full of controls (Telerik, Ajax, etc.) that all expand, collapse, show, hide, etc. when the page is loaded. Since this rendering happens on the client-side and can take different lengths of time based on the users machine specs, is there a way to detect when all (or some) rendering has taken place (jQuery?) so I can then act on specific elements, knowing they are fully rendered?
JavaScript is single threaded. The time passed to setTimeout is a minimum, but not a maximum, so if you pass something like 10(ms), you essentially are saying "execute this code after all the currently running code is finished."
So, if all the controls use $(document).ready() to do their thing, all you need is:
$(document).ready(function() {
setTimeout(function() {
doStuff();
},10);
});
doStuff will be called after all the functions passed to $(document).ready have run. However, this isn't foolproof. If the controls have their own way of detecting whether the document has loaded, or do their own setTimeout(), you're in trouble. The problem is that JavaScript does not guarantee the execution order of setTimeouts. Sometimes your code may run last, other times it may run before the setTimeouts used for the animation.
One last idea: if all the animation is done using jQuery, then the effects run in a single queue. In doStuff you could add an animation of some sort with a callback and be reasonably certain that the callback would run last.
Whenever I had to wait for multiple things to be ready before proceeding, I would create an array with true/false values. Every mandatory part of the page got an event which, when it is called, updates the specific entry in the array to true. Also, it called a general function which returned true if all values in an array was true, otherwise false.
If that function finally returned true, I would proceed with the execution. It is especially useful if you have to wait for an AJAX call to end but don't want to use async = true. It also is useful if you want to start loading multiple things at once instead of one after another, since they all report ready-state to the same array.
It does however use global variables so you might need to do some optimizations. You might not want to do this approach either if you have a grudge against global variables.
You should place your code inside the jQuery $(document).ready() function. This will ensure that all elements are loaded before the code runs.
http://docs.jquery.com/Tutorials:Introducing_$(document).ready()
I think the doc you need is:
http://docs.jquery.com/Events/load
"I can then act on specific elements, knowing they are fully rendered?"
You can use the load method (linked above) to attach to any element. So if you had a div with an id of "lastElement", you could write
$('div#lastElement).load(runThisFunction);