Partial class not working with Dynamic Data. I'm not using the default dynamicdata project type, but rather just using it on a control-by-control basis
I'm answering my own question straight after posting it, because it took me ages to find the solution, so I thought I'd try and save anyone searching some time. An easy fix, but not obvious. You need to make sure your dbml and partial class are in the SAME namespace.
I ran into a similar problem. The namespace wasn't my issue. After 2 hours of getting nowhere, I finally found the setting that fixed the issue for me. The .cs class file containing my partial classes had a Build Action of Content. I changed Build Action to Compile, and the customizations worked.
In Solution Explorer, right click your .cs file (the one with your partial classes), choose Properties, select Compile under Build Action.
Hope this helps.
Related
I have created a Visual Studio custom editor extension (implementing ITagger<T>). It works perfectly and applies syntax highlighting according to the domain specific language behind it. Nonetheless, when I edit the text, VS re-tags and re-formats only the edited line.
However, when a particular line changes, I need to force re-formatting all the visible lines following the edited line. I do not know how to do this. I tried many alternatives, including responding the Changed event of the TextBuffer behind.
Can you help me with ideas, or sample source code to custom editor implementations that handle this issue? The built-in C# editor does it: when I edit a line, and it becomes a multi-line comment, the text view is changed accordingly.
The extension code Formatter could format the class file and arrange fields, properties and methods as per StyleCop rules. Maybe it is an extension you want to get:
https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=vs-publisher-599079.CodeFormatter
One crude way is to close the document and open it again.
string path = dte.ActiveDocument.FullName;
dte.ActiveDocument.Save();
dte.ActiveDocument.Close();
dte.ItemOperations.OpenFile(path);
Although, I hope there is a better way to deal with this issue.
Edit: Well, I think I found a better way.
An event is declared in your tagger class (which implements ITagger interface). Raising the interface does the job flawlessly.
One of the issues I'm currently experiencing is that I can't seem to change the text of a Label which is implemented in a dynamically loaded AnchorPane. I assume this might be related to the controller and how JavaFX/TornadoFX works, but I can't seem to find what I'm doing wrong.
The issue itself occurs in this class, and happens in the showSystemDetails() method. What I would expect to happen is that upon pressing the "System Details" button in the sidebar, the labels would update to the required value, but this isn't happening for some reason.
Please feel free to point me to what I'm doing wrong, or provide any constructive criticism. The project is still in full development so a lot of things are still messy/broken.
The reason this isn't working is that you're manually loading a new version of the FMXL file every time you select something in your menu. The FXML file originally loaded by SystemDetailsViewProxy is updated correctly, but that's not the one you're showing on screen anymore.
To see the updated View, make sure you put the root node of the SystemDetailsViewProxy instance back.
You could for example change your DrawerMenuButton enum to contain references to SystemDetailsViewProxy::class instead of those two strings, and use add(viewClass) to add the correct root node to your view when clicking the menu buttons.
Furthermore, you should be using ViewModels and binding instead of manually updating the text property of the labels. You're doing an awful lot of manual/error prone work that the framework can help you with for free.
Your application is not using best practices in several important areas, and you're rolling your own solutions for stuff that the framework already does very well :)
Views are singletons when managed by the framework, but you instantiate them yourself instead of using inject/find. The result is that important life cycle methods are not being called.
I would also suggest looking into type safe builders instead of FXML.
Hope this helps :)
I have a specific theme which I apply to my html and now instead of editing it everything I create view. I want to edit the html helper methods and all all my necessary classes and id information can be put in one place.
How do i do this?
Do I just create a new custom one or is it easier to edit one that is already there? I do plan to add some ones that are not there.
I have googled abit but all the answerers I found give specific code to their problem. I dont even know which folder to put my classes in? In a book im reading about mvc it explains custom model template, but i dont think that is exactly what im looking for?
Even a basic example will be great.
Do I just create a new custom one or is it easier to edit one that is
already there? I do plan to add some ones that are not there.
I would say creating a custom one would be fast and simple. But if you still want to give a try by enhancing existing one, than you can get the source code of System.Web.Mvc for CodePlex, and make your necessary modifications and build it, reference it and use it in your project.
So my problem is exactly the same as this guy's here: http://www.pubbs.net/201003/flex/61462-flexcoders-flash-builder-super-class-regeneration.html , but unfortunately, he got no answer.
After initially generating service classes connecting with PHP, I modified the PHP, added new call specifically.
While the Data/Services window successfully made notice of the changes, including new function in the list, the service super-class didn't change whatsoever. Which baffles me, since all super-classes in generated service and valueObject packages contain an annotation like this:
This is a generated class and is not intended for modification. To customize behavior
of this service wrapper you may modify the generated sub-class of this class - SomethingService.as.
And also the sub-class contains something about "regeneration of the super-class". So obviously, my goal is to force the mentioned regeneration. Any thoughts?
Just had a similar problem and it was driving me nuts. In my case, I am using an Eclipse plug-in for Team Foundation Server (a source control repository). In TFS, files are kept read-only until you check them out. Usually when something behind the scenes tries to modify a file that I have open, the plug-in will check out the file automatically and let it make the changes. For some reason, it didn't in this case.
So for me, all I had to do was check out the file and it would then be able to regenerate (which translates to making the file writable for the rest of you who might have the same issue).
I find that most code generators work once to generate classes, but do not work well updating them. It's really hard (I've worked on them).
Can you correct your classes by hand?
I'm developing second language support for the site. So I made duplicate .ascx and .aspx files for existing ascx.cs and aspx.cs
Most of the time everything works fine.. but suddenly I'm getting:
Type 'ctrl_xxx' exists both in 'c:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\Temporary ASP.NET Files\d072cc72\b9d5698b\App_Web_xdmblegv.dll', and in 'c:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\Temporary ASP.NET Files\d072cc72\b9d5698b\App_Web_gkptrzo2.dll' (translated from russian)
ctrl_xxx ctrl = (ctrl_xxx) LoadControl("xxx.ascx");
I have few such strings of code... and same error occurs with one of them. But WITHOUT any changes from me with those files. To fix thaat bug for some time I need to delete solution and website folder and reget them from SS. Maybe there is an issue with solution? Solution was converted from vs2005.
You shouldn't localize an asp.net site by duplicating pages or controls. You use, for example, language specific resource files that are referenced in the one page or control. Have a look at this for a start on how to localize asp.net websites.
I agree with #Joe R, copying code is not a good way to localize. You may feel like you have gone too far down this road to change your approach, but in the long run you will be much happier and more productive with a different solution.
At the minimum I would switch to a different approach for the rest of the localization, finish the project, and then go back later and convert what you have already done to the new method.
Take a look at the following:
Globalization and localization
demystified in ASP.NET 2.0
How
do you localize a database driven
website
If you need a quick fix for your problem, you'll need to give new names to all of the pages and controls you copied. The error comes from having two user controls with the same name (just like it says).
However, everyone else is correct in that you are going about this the wrong way. What happens when you need to change some code? It will cause extra maintenance because you need to make changes in two places. More than likely, you will forget one, and you'll end up wasting a lot of time. If you invest in using language resource files now, you'll save on headaches later. And, I'm not even mentioning the possibility of needing to add an additional language down the road.
Edit
Try the following if you still don't want to use language resource files.
Put the non-language specific code into a separate .cs file. Make sure it inherits from System.Web.UI.UserControl
In ASCX 1, make sure its ascx.cs class inherits from your class you created in step 1.
In ASCX 2, make sure its ascx.cs class inherits from your class you created in step 2.