truecrypt - copy without mounting - mount

I would like to copy files into a truecrypt partition without mounting it or mounting it in a hide way (without another volume displayed in "my computer"). I considered hiding the new volume but it requires admin priv' whice i dont have.
Thank you!

I don't think you can do that by definition. But if what you want to achieve is to prevent any other user being able to view your files in the mounted TC volume you could change the file permissions to deny read+write access to everyone except yourself.

Related

Can i hide .laccdb files or change its name with MS Access settings

Title says it simply.
I have a MS Access Database on a shared drive and the majority of users aren't experts so quite often the leave their PC with the Database open then it locks the PC, someone else will come along and switch it to their account, go to open the Database and get confused by the two files with the same name.
I can think of solutions for this e.g. using shortcuts so they dont actually see the laccdb or accdb file
But what I want to know is if there are any settings in Access (2010) that can make the .laccdb file hidden when it is created or just give it a random name like word or excel tmp files?
When I google this the results are more for removing people from the database so you can delete the laccdb file
This is actually a multi-user setup even though just one user can be active.
So you need to distribute the frontend to each user while having the backend in a folder with access for all users - that could be a subfolder of C:\Users\Public.
Here's is a script that will handle the distribution:
Deploy and update a Microsoft Access application in a Citrix environment

Is there a possibility to encrypt media files uploaded in Moodle?

I've run into a problem using Moodle 3.2. I'm uploading mp3-files to be played in a quiz. I have the license to use those files for that specific purpose, but I am not the owner. Thus, I would like to ensure that nobody without a Moodle account can access these files.
However, the path to the files can be extracted from the source code and once you have the path, anybody can access the file. Is there any way to protect the file so only registered users can access it, even if they have the direct path?
Thank you so much!
All the best
Dom
EDIT: I've learned that files actually are encrypted by login - I just had the login cookie remaining in several browsers and thus was able to access them.
Are the files served by moodleinstallation/pluginfile.php/? This would include login/permission checks

Where to store images for albums?

I am creating a module of my website where I can display images in "albums", much like facebook.
For storing/grouping images, I planned on having them in the ~/Images folder inside my application's structure. Is this considered bad practice, or will it open up my application to any security vulnerabilities? I read that you shouldn't place things like this in your site structure, but I don't quite understand why (or if this is the same scenario).
Therefore, albums would be grouped as...
~/Images/album1, ~/Images/album2, etc.
Is this an appropriate thing to put inside App_Data, or is there a more 'preferred' location for things such as this?
Sorry if this is a trivial question.
All three of the answers here are good. There is no preferred storage for uploaded images, it's all up to you based on your requirements.
As Henhealg says, don't store them in App_Data. If you put them here, they will not be accessible from the web. For example, the following would not render an image even if the path was correct:
<img src="/App_Data/album1/image1.png" alt="" />
One option is to have your local ~/Albums directory mapped to a different folder accessible to the web server, like sylon says. This keeps the images out of the directory where your MVC app is served from, but "pretends" that they are there. If you control IIS and can set up a file share, this may be an option for you.
Also, like XToro says, storing them in a SQL database is an option. Storing here is flexible because you don't have to worry about folder or file name collisions. Multiple users can each have albums and files with the same names, yet they won't collide because they don't occupy filesystem space the same way normal files do. If security is important to your app (not showing photos or albums to unauthorized users), having them in a SQL table makes this fairly easy.
However if you are not as worried about security or file naming collisions, you can just as easily store them in your MVC app's ~/Images or ~/Albums directory.
Depending on the performance of your server, you may want to consider storing your images into a database using BLOB
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/blob.html
Images can be easily sorted, organized, categorized without the need to worry about folder structures and folder permissions. Simply use your PHP/AJAX/language of your choice to provide the authentication and choose which files you wish to display.
This way, each image can have it's own fields (as many as you want) like the user who posted it, the original filename, a caption, the album it belongs in etc etc
Since you can easily as a user check where the images are stored once the application is in production, where you store the images does not matter as much as what permissions you set to the folder(s) that the images are stored in.
I would use file system as you are saying but store it outside of the application folder as you are saying it is bad practice. I agree with this - when i do deployments I prefer to delete everything and drop in the new code and keep the web.config file that way I always have a clean environment and it is much easier to get started from scratch without having to worry about what I need to back up or bring from previous install.
I would use IIS to map the directory into my solution wherever I desire from a network share storage or whereever you want to safely keep your albums.
e.g. D:\MySafeStorage\Albums\ map to your website's ~\Albums\ when your website is in C:\inetpub\MyWebSite\

Prevent users from deleting files uploaded Alfresco

I've been testing Alfresco for a few days but seem not to find a solution for this.
In Alfresco when an user uploads a file to a folder where it has the contributor role everything works nice, but he can delete that file. I want avoid that so I have defined a rule that takes the ownership of every file uploaded. The script is defined as
document.setOwner('admin');
This way the file can be deleted only by admin. If the rule is active the upload fails for everyother user. Does anybody know what it takes to take ownership of a file in that situation using a script?
I am using Alfresco 4.0a
Thanks.
I guess you can better do the following
document.setOwner("");
Because admin already has full authority in Alfresco.

Physical Path for image saving. Asp.net

I have a web project and I saved my images in Physical folders in hdd Like d:\SecretImages\Imagename. But I can't open the files when I have to?
I thought if it can saves for examle d:\SecretImages\Temp.jpg, I can open when I have to but, I can't.
Help me please, thanks
You cannot use file paths to show your images. The browser doesn't know where to find the images and the server wouldn't serve them up anyway due to security concerns.
You could/should use an HttpHandler to show the images.
I answered a similar question here on SO how to do this.
its becus when iis get file, it get as ASP.NET user not local system user. just go to the folder and add IIS_IURS group to permission list. or just set folder accessible by everyone.
this type of problem mostly not occur when local debugging. but will happen in production or network storage.
Try this article
http://www.aspsnippets.com/Articles/Display-Images-in-GridView-Control-using-the-path-stored-in-SQL-Server-database.aspx

Resources