I am experimenting adding plugins to CRM2011 server. Following the steps of Plug-in Sample with the sdk, everything worked as expected. However, when I tried to register the plugin to Disk (the default is to Database), I got
Unhandled Exception: System.ServiceModel.FaultException`1[[Microsoft.Xrm.Sdk.OrganizationServiceFault, Microsoft.Xrm.Sdk, Version=5.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]]: Unable to load plug-in assembly.
Seemed that the server couldn't find the microsoft.xrm.sdk file. But why the same setting worked fine when publishing to Database?
I have added "write" privilege to user "Network Service" for folder C:\program files\MicrosoftDynamics CRM\Server\bin but got same error message.
The Server OS is Windows 2008 R2 Running inside a vmware player virtual machine.
I have got the answer from microsoft forum. Turned out that I need to manually copy the dll over to CRM server under CRMINSTLLDIR/Server/bin/assembly then I can do the registration from my client machine.
Now that I know the concept but still think it anti-intuitive. Is there any reason that Microsoft designed its plugin registration process this way? Security?
If you try adding group "Everyone" with full access to the bin folder, do you still get the error?
One does seem to be stuck with registering the .dll in the CRM database once that selection has been made, so one cannot then start using the assembly folder (disk) after that.
I've sort off gone with always using disk when dev'ing so one can quickly update just the assembly and only use the database option in a production environment.
If you really want to deploy to disk try this:
Create a share on the […]/Server/bin/assembly folder with read/write for just the developer. Alternatively if the developer has admin rights on the server you can skip this step and just use the admin share. For example:
\servername\c$\Program Files\Microsoft Dynamics CRM\Server\bin\assembly
In Visual Studio, under the Project/Properties menu selection, in the Post-build event command line box, add a command to copy your .dll (and .pdb if debugging). The copy command should include either the share name created in the previous step, or the path using the admin$
Also, take a look at the macros available under the Edit Post-build button. You will find some useful bits like $(TargetFileName) to abstract actual file and folder names.
Now every time you build, your files will automatically be copied to the server.
Even though I register my plugin to the database, I use this method all the time. If you want to do any remote debugging you will need the .dll and .pdb in the assembly folder on the server.
Related
My question may have already been asked but any of the answers match my case.
I need to do a website (ASP.NET MVC 4) with some features of a software. I have finished to developed my website and wanted to test it in a test environment (Windows server 2008 - 64bits).
It works perfectly fine with my dev computer(windows 7 - 64bits). But after I deployed it on IIS, one of my features doesn't work.
This feature is a bit particular. It need a 32 bits COM written in VB6 (this dll can't be change) that call an other dll. When I test the website deployed on IIS, the first ddl is called fine but the 2nd seemed to be not called at all.
This dll are in the installed file of the software. I have the same version of on both computer.
I authorize my app pool to use 32bits application. I tried to give some access to my dll (the COM and interop) like IUSR, IIS_IUSRS. But nothing seems to work.
I have checked both of my dll are registered properly.
I'm a bit lost. Can someone help me ?
PS: Sorry for my English, I can speak but I'm really weak with syntax.
Some suggestion here:
You need to figure out which managed dll, native dll and lib files are referenced by your application (directly or indirectly).
For managed dll, make sure they are in the web's bin folder.
For native dll and .lib files, check out whether those .dll and .lib files are in the PATH. If not, you can either copy them to there; or, you can put them into a folder and add that folder into the PATH. Then restart VS and IIS (command "iisreset") to make sure the setting is picked up.
By the way, putting all of the files in the web's bin folder won't help. The reason is CLR copies the files into a temporary folder under framework directory and run the web there, but CLR only copies away managed dll (not the native ones), so you still get "module not found" error.
I have reproduced this error using the following sample solution
Web1 references a managed c++ project say "MCpp1.dll". The project further references two unmanaged c++ projects with the output say "Lib1.lib" and "Lib2.lib"
If I copy all of those files into web's bin folder, I get the exception of "module not found error".
I create a folder say "C:\Lib" and copy "Lib1.lib" and "Lib2.lib" into it and add this folder into PATH. I restart VS, and also run "IISReset" since I have a IIS web
Open VS and request a page and it works now
I have also contacted the CLR/Fusion team for suggestion of how to get the related module name when this exception happens, which should be very helpful to make diagnosis.
Hope this helps ,
GODFATHER
Once a week I get the new version of .net assembly which I need to deploy to our Axapta 2012 installation. I don't want to copy this dll to axapta client folder on each computer. So I am searching the way to deploy it to AOS and hope it will deploy on each client automatically.
I have found many solution (this is one of them), but all of them works only if I have the source code of this assembly. I don't have. And I can not to 'Add VS project to AOT' and deploy it using VS add-ins.
Is there any way to deploy .net assembly (as compiled DLL) from AOS to each client ?
If you cannot do it using the "Add VS projection to AOT" method, you can use the SysFileDeployment class. This is demonstrated in Joris DG his blogpost here.
On msdn the description of the SysFileDeploymentclass is as follows:
The SysFileDeployment class is used for deploying files from the server to the clients.
On msdn it is also explained how you need to do this.Basically all you need to do is extend this class and point to the files you need to deploy (in your case a dll). You will also have to change the build number of you solution to trigger the deployment.
You can also deploy dll's by adding them to the GAC, as demonstrated here:
Axilicious: AX2012 DLL Deployment and how AX binds DLL’s at runtime
To summarize main differences are:
Using the visual studio properties: it is deployed to a folder specific to that user (so a different folder for each user) at the moment it is needed
Using SysFileDeployment: it is copied to the client bin folder, a restart of the client is needed (possibly problems when on citrix/terminal services, like Joris suggests in the link you provided?)
GAC: DLL's are stored in the Global Assembly Cache and different versions are stored but you need to provide a mechanism of deploying them yourself
Personally I would try the SysFileDeployment method as it's the standard method MS provide. If you have trouble, you might receive support.
The Background (skip to the bottom if you want the question)
Recently I upgraded an SVN repository (hosted on assembla) to SVN 1.7. After doing so, we started to intermittently encounter lots of File Access Denied errors on the ASP.NET site pages that sit in the local working copy of the repository.
Some folders also started to get weird file permissions (they became marked read-only) and user sharing got removed from them. These problems would only start occurring after an update/commit cycle, via AnkhSVN's Visual Studio plugin, but not all the time; it seemed highly temperamental.
The only temp-fix we've found so far is to commit any outstanding changes, delete the local copy and re-checkout a full working copy (with TortoiseSVN). However, that is not a viable fix, and it is seriously impacting on productivity.
This site is an Azure based ASP.NET WebWorkerRole. It has never given problems before the upgrade to SVN 1.7. I tried fiddling with the internal IIS permissions to get around the problem, however, no dice.
My Environment
Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate 10.0.40219.1 SP1
AnkhSVN 2.3.10509 (latest version, supports SVN 1.7.1)
TortoiseSVN 1.7.1, Build 22161 - 64 Bit
Running in Debug Mode via the Azure emulator environment
The Question
Is it possible for SVN 1.7 or any of the tools in my environment to break file permissions so that the files become unusable in an ASP.NET site? and more importantly, how do I fix this?
The exact file permission error dumped out is this:
Access to the path '//file//' is denied.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of
the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more
information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.UnauthorizedAccessException: Access to the
path '//file//' is denied.
ASP.NET is not authorized to access the requested resource. Consider
granting access rights to the resource to the ASP.NET request
identity. ASP.NET has a base process identity (typically
{MACHINE}\ASPNET on IIS 5 or Network Service on IIS 6 and IIS 7, and
the configured application pool identity on IIS 7.5) that is used if
the application is not impersonating. If the application is
impersonating via , the identity will be
the anonymous user (typically IUSR_MACHINENAME) or the authenticated
request user.
To grant ASP.NET access to a file, right-click the file in Explorer,
choose "Properties" and select the Security tab. Click "Add" to add
the appropriate user or group. Highlight the ASP.NET account, and
check the boxes for the desired access.
But a clean working copy will not generate this error. Comparing the permissions of the two, it seems the working copies that are not bugged are shared (with IUSR and the local account), whereas the broken ones have zero sharing, yet the sharing is never changed by the user.
When subversion updates a file it first creates a temporary version in .svn/tmp/. It then moves the file into the right location. (This to avoid corruptions)
In 1.6 it did this for every directory by itself, but in 1.7 there is just a .svn in the top level directory of your working copy.
If somehow the filesystem permissions of this .svn directory are restricted, it is possible that the restrictions are copied with the file when it is moved in place.
(Subversion doesn't change the permissions itself on Windows)
I solved this by accessing the security settings for the website folder and and clicking Advanced and then Change Permissions for the IIS_IUSRS user. I checked the "Replace all child object permissions with inheritable permissions from this object" and clicked apply.
Before that, I had given the IIS user full permissions to the hidden tmp folder in the root of the checkout, but I don't know if this helps with anything.
I'm not sure if this is a permanent fix, but in case it is not, you can at least use it to reapply permissions for all the files in a single operation.
Much information is located in .svn folders inside directory where project was checked out. So in my opinion better use SVN separately from advanced integration tools. Also this deals with solving problem like this.
I found this exact same issue happened when I did a 'Revert' using:
Tortoise Svn 1.6.16
AnkhSVN 2.3.11269.1348.
Visual Studio 2010 Professional
Windows 7 - 64 bit.
I was completely puzzled the first time I encountered the permissions error and started off by thinking it was my code. After a while of fiddling about I ended up deleting the whole project and re-downloading from Subversion which fixed the issue.
When this problem happened again I looked more closely at the reverted file, and I found the permissions on the reverted files do not match the permissions of the other files. Specifically 'Users' permissions, for the machine that Visual Studio is running on, is missing altogether.
So I just added it in by:
Right clicking on the problem file. This caused the file properties window to appear.
Then clicked on 'Edit...'. The permission window appears.
Then clicked on Add and the 'Select Users, Computers, Service Accounts, or Groups window appears.
Click on the Object Types button and check all the boxes.
Click on the Locations button and make sure your machine name is selected.
Type in 'users' then click the 'check names' button.
Click OK on all the windows to close them.
Your website should now run without the permissions error.
Is it required to have anything SQL Server related installed on a web server in order to make use of SMO? I've built a web app that programmatically creates a SQL Agent job, adds a step (which ultimately fires of dtexec to run an SSIS package), and executes.
This works fine on my local machine which has SQL client tools installed, however when I move to a web server, I get reference issues and I'm starting to think it's due to something not being installed.
Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.SqlServer.SqlClrProvider, Version=10.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=89845dcd8080cc91' or one of its dependencies.
This is a rat hole.
The problem is that once you locate that assembly and copy it to the bin folder of your application it will complain about a completely different one.. or even the same file simply due to missing dependencies.
For more information read this: http://www.sqldbadiaries.com/2010/10/20/how-i-fixed-could-not-load-file-or-assembly-microsoft-sqlserver-smo-version10-0-0-0-issue/
That site lists the files you need and the fact you need to register and gac a few files. Quite frankly, you are much better off just biting the bullet and install the client tools on your web server.
Yes, your application requires this assembly in its bin directory to function. This error means that the server doesn't have the SMO (and its dependant) assemblies.
Back in your solution in Visual Studio, right click on the assembly above, and select/change the "Copy Local" to "True". Copy this for each SMO assembly that you've referenced.
When you publish your application, this will bring those .DLLs on your development machine along in your published bin directory.
Check your web.config file for any references as well
search your code for SqlClrProvider
Since, for various reasons, I can't use IIS for an ASP.NET website I'm developing, I run Cassini from the command line to test the site. However, after installing Visual Studio 2008 SP1, I get a System.Net.Sockets.SocketException when I try to start up the web server. Is anyone else having this problem, and if so, how did you fix it?
Is there anything in the Application section of the event log?
Have you tried using a different port?
Per this thread, try:
Unbind from Visual Source safe, delete the web project from the solution, rename the folder where the website is stored and then re add to the solution as an existing web site and then bind to source safe again.
There may be some incorrect info in your .suo or .sln file. You can safely rename the former, as it is user-specific (solution user options); the latter (the solution itself) would be a bit more of a hassle to recreate.