http://jsbin.com/uqafo4
Please check the white area: it should go all the way, as I used width: 100%, but it doesn't.
#container {
background-color:#FFF;
background-position:center bottom;
background-repeat:no-repeat;
height: 440px;
width: 100%;
}
By default the body tag in some browsers have a margin set on them in the User Agent (default) stylesheet. Simple use
body { margin: 0; }
to remove this margin. You should also consider using a reset stylesheet, such as this one by Eric Meyer.
The problem is that the <body> element has some default area around there, add this to the body rule to be safe:
margin: 0;
You cant test the updated version here, no space :)
Following Yi Jiang's advice should solve your problem.
If you don't have a background-image, you can remove
background-position:center bottom;
background-repeat:no-repeat;
I would also suggest adding some padding, for example:
padding:10px;
but perhaps you're thinking about doing that already, only you haven't added the code yet. Or perhaps you don't want to use padding for some reason or another.
Related
This is my website.
I create Wrapper div.
#wrapper {
background: url(../img/bg.png) repeat;
width:100%;
height:100%;}
But it doesn't work completely. Wrapper doesn't include bottom. Why ?
If what you mean not 100% is the dotted background, I've come out with a solution by changing the height property in CSS:
height: auto;
This will fix it somehow. Hope it helps!
I have a portfolio page with a image display with zoom.
I have this code: http://codepen.io/Mpleandro/pen/LvrqJ
The div that shows the image has a class of .display, on line 13 of the HTML and the css formating for this div isline 90.
The image width will be flexible, so I what I want is to make the containing div inherit the width of image.
I tried the css property auto, inherit and min-with, but nothing works!
Could someone help me?
P.S.: I need a responsive solution.
Thanks
since 1 year has passed you may not be interested in the solution, but hope that helps someone else.
I also had a situation like that where I needed a div to be of the same width as the image and this had to be responsive.
In my case, I set a fixed width for the div
.some-div{
width: 250px;
}
I also had responsive image:
img{
display: block;
max-width: 100%;
height; auto;
}
and then I added a media query with threshold when the fixed width of the div started to affect the responsive nature and simply addedd this:
#media screen and (max-width: 917px){
.some-div{
width: 100%;
}
}
For my project the threshold was 917px when the fixed width started to affect.
I guess it is a solution that will fit everyone since width: 100% after the certain threshold will always be the width of the image if the image is responsive.
I don't know how to give you a perfect answer, but I can hopefully send you in the right direction. First, you can forget about inherit or min-width because they are not what you want.
auto is the default value, and I think that the default behaviour is very close to what you want: the width of the div adapt to its content. If this is not the current behaviour, this is because of many other reasons including the positioning of that div. The thing is, you won't have a proper centering and sizing of the <div class="display"> with only CSS, because it would need a specific explicit width declaration.
Since you already use Javascript to display/hide the good images, you could use Javascript to set the width everytime you change the image that is in the box.
My best advice would be to use existing solutions which are tested, approved and look really good. A 2 seconds Google search pointed me to Fesco which you could try.
I'm not sure if this is what you mean, but if it is, I hope it will help!
If you want your image to fill the div, but to scale with the browser, try setting the width of your div. Next, apply max-width="100%"; height: auto; to your image.
The simplest solution would be to just set .display to display: inline-block;, which would adjust its size to the contained image. If you want to be responsive as well, you need to define an upper limit via max-height: 80%, for example.
Put together, it would look like this: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/IluBt
JS line 17:
$(".display").css("display","inline-block");
CSS for .display
.display {
position: relative;;
background: rgba(255,255,255,0.5);
border-radius: 10px;
-moz-border-radius: 10px;
-webkit-border-radius: 10px;
max-height:80%; /* <-- limit the height */
top:10%;
left:0;
margin:auto;
}
And to align everything nicely:
.loader {
color: red;
position: fixed;
width: 100%; height: 100%;
background: rgba(0,0,0, 1) url(../http://www.mpleandro.com.br/images/new/loader.gif) no-repeat center center;
text-align: center;
}
I am trying to get rid of a distinctly unwanted second vertical scrollbar that has appeared on this page I am putting together, see http://abchealth.info/doc-mike-special/test3/.
My research here led me to try and remove the 'overflow' from my CSS, but this absolutely trashed my layout, so I am looking for a solution that removes the inner vertical scrollbar without changing anything else...
I'd much appreciate your help, thanks!
Here's my CSS:
/* Generated by KompoZer */
body {
background-image: url(http://abchealth.info/images/bg.png);
}
html, body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
height: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
}
div#wrap {min-height: 100%;}
div#mastercontainer {
overflow:auto; width: 100%;
height: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
}
div#header {
background-image: url(http://abchealth.info/images/header-bg.jpg); background-repeat:
repeat-x;
position: top; height: 96px;}
div#content {
}
div#innercontentmiddle {
margin: 0 auto;
width: 540px;
padding:10px; padding-bottom:510px;}
div#footerclear {
}
div#footer {
position:relative; margin-top: -510px; height: 510px; clear:both;
background-image: url(http://abchealth.info/images/footer-bg.jpg); background-repeat:
repeat-x;}
/*Opera Fix*/
body:before {
content:"";
height:100%;
float:left;
width:0;
margin-top:-32767px;/
}
change this: #mastercontainer {overflow:auto;} to #mastercontainer {overflow: visible;}
What's happening is 'auto' uses a scroll bar if the content is too big for the frame. Aka that div or w/e needs enlarged to avoid the scroll. Visible will let it overflow like I think you want. Either visible or even hidden would work with this code-- css is all about playing around and experimenting.
***Most browsers offer a plug-in called 'FireBug' -> download it. It allows you to edit the css etc of webpages while viewing. Very useful for css styling errors. Highly recommended for issues such as this.
This works
#mastercontainer { overflow: hidden; }
or the above solution works too.
Remove overflow:auto from div#mastercontainer.
If the problem is due to html, body { overflow-x: hidden;} then try using html, body{height: 100%;} it worked fine for me.
For anyone using ion-icons and bootstrap, the issue can be in ionic/structure.css.
I was using ion-icons on the website and in ionic/structure.css I found these two properties causing the issue and changing them solved the issue.
{
overflow: hidden;
overscroll-behavior-y: none;
}
Changed to:
{
overflow: scroll;
overscroll-behavior-y: scroll;
}
Setting overflow-y to'hidden' can in many cases remove the vertical scrollbar. As can setting it to 'visible' because that means that overflow is visible which means no need to scroll, so scrollbars are not visible.
Those setting however don't always work, because of what is said at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/overflow :
In order for overflow to have an effect, the block-level container must have either a set height (height or max-height) or white-space set to nowrap.
The above link is a good resource for trying to understand how 'overflow' works in general, it's not as simple as you could hope.
For instance, another note, from there:
Setting one axis to visible (the default) while setting the other to a different value results in visible behaving as auto.
I installed this plugin on a theme. This theme had a slider, but I didn't like it. So I installed this one.
http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/content-slide/
I tried using this
#wpcontent_slider_container{
position:relative;
margin: 0 auto;
}
And this
#wpcontent_slider_container{
position:relative;
margin-left:auto;
margin-right:auto;
}
And nothing happens.
Do I have to put something in div?
Change width
#wpcontent_slider_container{
width: 500px;
margin:0 auto;
}
I had the same problem. This is how I solved it:
#wpcontent_slider_container {
margin-left: auto !important;
margin-right: auto !important;
}
#wpcontent_slider {
/* Your styling here */
}
Without the "!important" thingy the CSS didn't work fo me either.
In #wpcontent_slider_container's parent element add
text-align:center;
to center align your #wpcontent_slider_container
If you know the width of the slider, here is a little fix that worked for me when center align was being stubborn.
#sliderDiv{
position:relative;
left:50%;
margin-left:-(half the width of the div);
(ex. if div is at 500px it would be margin-left:-250px;)
}
It's not pretty, but it works. You might have to hide the horizontal overflow of the outer container though.
#wpcontent_slider_container{
text-align: center;
}
or use <center> Tag
Finally I can fix the problem with the slider ubication in my web page.
Just modify the style.css , .main_img { float:left; margin:15px 10px 0 60px}, change the values.
Using the 'margin-right' and 'margin-left' on auto !important worked for me as well. It actually also worked even without using the !important command.
How can I get an image to stretch the height of a DIV class?
Currently it looks like this:
However, I would like the DIV to be stretched so the image fits properly, but I do not want to resize the `image.
Here is the CSS for the DIV (the grey box):
.product1 {
width: 100%;
padding: 5px;
margin: 0px 0px 15px -5px;
background: #ADA19A;
color: #000000;
min-height: 100px;
}
The CSS being applied on the image:
.product{
display: inline;
float: left;
}
So, how can I fix this?
Add overflow:auto; to .product1
In the markup after the image, insert something like <div style="clear:left"/>. A bit messy, but it's the easiest way I've found.
And while you're at it, put a bit of margin on that image so the text doesn't butt up against it.
Assuming #John Millikin is correct, the code
.product + * { clear: left; }
would suffice to do the same thing without forcing you to manually adjust the code after the div.
One trick you can use is to set the <div>'s overflow property to hidden. This forces browsers to calculate the physical size of the box, and fixes the weird overlap problem with the floated image. It will save you from adding in any extra HTML markup.
Here's how the class should look:
.product1 {
width: 100%;
padding: 5px;
margin: 0px 0px 15px -5px;
background: #ADA19A;
color: #000000;
min-height: 100px;
overflow: hidden;
}
This looks like a job for clearfix to me ...
Try the following:
.Strech
{
background:url(image.jpg);
background-size:100% 100%;
background-repeat:no-repeat;
width:500px;
height:500px;
}
display:inline
float:left
is your problem
Floating makes the parents width not be stretched by the child, try placing the image without the float. If you take the float off, it should give you the desired effect.
Another approach would be to make sure you are clearing your floats at the end of the parent element so that they don't scope creep.
Update: After viewing your link Your height issue as displayed, is because the floats are not being cleared.