on the page products.aspx i created a form:
<form id="send_info_form" method="post" action="send_email.aspx">
<input type="text" name="the_name />
<input type="submit" />
</form>
when i click on submit it's forwarded to the same page (products.aspx) and not to the page i set in action attribute of the form.
It looks like you have a misunderstanding about how ASP.NET's logic works- ASP.NET has a much different paradigm than PHP or ASP does.
It seems like you're taking more of an ASP classic or PHP approach of directly handling the landing pages of forms and POST values, which you no longer have to do. You shouldn't need a separate page to handle the logic of the form submission either; this is all handled by event handlers in the submitting page's codebehind.
Instead of handling input elements directly, you should use ASP.NET's server controls to handle all the inputs for you.
What you should be doing is:
In the Products.aspx page:
E-mail Address: <asp:TextBox runat="server" ID="txtEmail" />
<asp:Button runat="server" ID="btnSubmit" OnClick="btnSubmit_Click" Text="Submit" />
Note that there's no form tag required (besides the one already provided to you when you first make the ASPX page.
Since you're working with an object-oriented language with a business objects representing all of your HTML elements with ASP.NET, you don't have to handle reading from the POST values of the form directly.
In the codebehind for Products.aspx (I'm assuming C#, so Products.aspx.cs), add a method for btnSubmit_Click:
protected void btnSubmit_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) {
string sendEmailTo = txtEmail.Text;
// insert mail sending logic here
}
In ASP.NET, the tag will by default always post itself to the same page. This allows you to handle any events in the codebehind in the ASPX page. It's not clear from your question what exactly you're trying to do. I can think of three possible scenarios:
1) You want to post back to the same page, and toggle visibility of UI elements (other panels, etc.) based on the result of the processing, or redirect the user to a second destination page once processing is complete. This is the most common scenario and the approach I recommend be taken, because it keeps all the logic regarding the processing of the form in one place.
2) You can specify a PostBackUrl to specify another (ASP.NET) page for button controls and whatnot. From there you can do the processing from elements on the first page on the second page using the PreviousPage property. See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178139.aspx for more information.
3) If you have a separate page you wish to post to that you don't control that's not ASP.NET-based (i.e., another site's form, or a PHP/ASP3.0 site you run), things get significantly more difficult. ASP.NET puts everything in one giant elements. Since tags cannot reliably be embedded within each other in HTML, you will either have to do a silent POST manually from your codebehind, or use Javascript to quietly submit an ajax request upon submission.
Related
I have an asp button that looks like this:
Default.aspx
<asp:button id="button1" runat="server" Text="clickme" onclick="function" />
Default.aspx.cs
protected void function(object sender EventArgs e)
{
// Do some calculation
}
However, whenever I press the button, the entire page gets refreshed. I have looked on this site and found many solutions, but none of them really works for my project. Here are some of the suggested solutions:
set onclick="return false;" // but then how do I run the function in the code-behind?
use !IsPostBack in Page_Load // but the page still refreshes completely. I don't want Page_Load to be called at all.
Disable AutoEventWireup. // making this true or false doesn't make a difference.
Does anyone have a solution to this, or is it really impossible?
I would place the control inside of an Update panel.
To do so, you would also need a script manager above it, so something like this:
<asp:ScriptManager runat="server" ID="sm">
</asp:ScriptManager>
<asp:updatepanel runat="server">
<ContentTemplate>
<asp:button id="button1" runat="server" Text="clickme" onclick="function" />
</ContentTemplate>
</asp:updatepanel>
if a control inside the update panel does a postback, it will only reload the part of the page inside of the upate panel.Here is a link you may find useful from the MSDN site.
I think there is a fundamental misunderstanding here of how ASP.Net works.
When a user first requests your page, an instance of your Page class is created. The ASP.Net framework runs through the page lifecycle with this page instance in order to generate html. The html response is then sent to the user's browser. When the browser receives the response it renders the page for the user. Here's the key: by the time rendering is complete, your page class instance was probably already collected by the .Net garbage collector. It's gone, never to be seen again.
From here on out, everything your page does that needs to run on the server, including your method, is the result of an entirely new http request from the browser. The user clicks the button, a new http request is posted to the web server, the entire page lifecycle runs again, from beginning to end, with a brand new instance of the page class, and an entirely new response is sent to the browser to be re-rendered from scratch. That's how ASP.Net (and pretty much any other web-based technology) works at its core.
Fortunately, there are some things you can do to get around this. One option is to put most of your current Page_Load code into an if (!IsPostBack) { } block. Another option is to set up your method with the [WebMethod] attribute and make an ajax request to the method from the button. Other options include calling web services from custom javascript and ASP.Net UpdatePanel controls.
What works best will depend on what other things are on the page that user might have changed.
That is normal behavior for asp.net, you are actually causing a postback of the the page in order for the associated event to be called on the server.
I would suggest working with update panels but if you just need something to happen on the backend without it causing any major change on the web page, I would use jquery and a web service. The main reason for me is that update panels create huge viewstate objects.
Have a look here for asp.net ajax : http://www.asp.net/ajax
And here for an example of jquery and wcf : http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/132809/Calling-WCF-Services-using-jQuery
I have a similar problem. this answer helps me a lot. in your asp button.<asp:button id="button1" runat="server" Text="clickme" OnClientClick="return SomeMethod();" /> and in the SomeMethod which is a js method do your logic like manipulating your page then return false as the mentioned answer suggest.
In my project I want to run 2 forms in one webpage which is master page one is for contact us and one is for signup user. but multiple server side forms are not allowed. is there any solution for fix it?
You can use postback ability of Asp.net Webforms.
You should create one button for singup and another one for contact. You can catch event in server side and you do what want to do.
You can create regular client side forms created using HTML in the master page, and use the Request.Form to read the posted data. For this to work, all the input elements must have a name, and you can read them using Request.Form["ElementName"].
Take into account that forms cannot be nested.
So, your master page needs to llok like this
...
<body>
<form id="form1" runat="server">
</form>
<form id="contact" action="Contact.aspx" method="post">
<input type="text" name="Message"/>
<input type="submit" value="Contact us!"/>
</form>
</body>
The first <form> is the regular ASP.NET server side form, which supports server side components
The second <form> is a custom HTML form. It doesn't have the runat="server" attribute, and it's outside the server side <form>.
The second form action points to a .aspx page. In its page load event you can use the Request.Form["Name"] to acces the name of the contact form. Note that you also need to include a submit button to send the data to the server, and a method="post" to specify the method to send the page.
This is resorting to "basic" HTML controls, so there is no View State, and the posted values will be lost if they're not reset in the server. I.e. if the form is posted, and there's an error, the previously posted values will be lost when rendering the page again.
If you want to make it more sophisticated you can use Javascript and, optionally AJAX. But that's a more complex solution. See this for an example.
ASP.NET Forms only supports one form. You could use an iFrame and render your second page (second form) inside of the iFrame.
Here is an interesting post about placing some page content after the tag. This may be helpful to you.
http://forums.asp.net/t/1611822.aspx?Dynamically+adding+content+to+page+outside+of+the+aspnet+form+from+within+a+UC
I have 3 ASP.Net pages. Each one has a form, a submit button, and a Javascript submit function, which it validates textbox data.
When I convert these 3 pages to Master Page/Content Page, what is the best way to merge three forms and submit functions?
Thanks in advance!
Just because multiple pages have forms doesn't mean the form processing logic should be refactored into a master page. In the codebehind of wherever a form is defined is typically the best place for the form processing logic to go.
If they only differ by the contents of the form, then put everything else into the Master page, and the form alone into each Content Page.
I'd leave the Submit method for each form in it's Content page's code-behind, because these will be independent of each other.
You could have them all link to the same javascript validation file, for neatness, and call different validation methods
<asp:ScriptManager ID="ScriptManager1" runat="server">
<Scripts>
<asp:ScriptReference Path="Validation.js" />
</Scripts>
</asp:ScriptManager>
and have each form's Submit button call its own method, e.g.
<asp:Button ID="btnSave" runat="server" OnClientClick="ValidateFormA" OnClick="Save" Text="Save" />
I would create a web user control to encapsulate the UI and functionality of the submit button, Javascript submit function, and textbox.
Then you could add the control to a master page if you wanted to.
You can put the submit function in the master page and make the content pages define per-page functions or variables that the submit function uses.
For more specific advice, please post more details.
I have a web application that has a page that loads the content from the database. I want to be able to put a form in the dynamic content, but .net doesn't let the inside form perform it's action. Is there a way to allow this or some other way I can get a form on a dynamic content page?
--EDIT--
I think I need to clarify something. This is an aspx page that loads content from the database. As far as I know, the text I pull from the db and stick in the Label is never compiled or processed by the .net wp, thus I can't use the code behind to fix this issue.
This is a common problem, when you want to have a non-postback form to a 3rd party site (like a PayPal button, for example).
The problem occurs because HTML doesn't let you have form within a form, and most ASP.NET pages have a <form runat="server" /> "high up" in the HTML (or in the Master page).
My favorite solution is to hide the "high up" form tag, while still showing all of the content. Then you can feel free to dump any tags you want in the body. If you do this dynamically you can choose on a page-by-page basis which pages have custom forms.
I created a class called GhostForm.cs to handle this. You can read all about it here:
http://jerschneid.blogspot.com/2007/03/hide-form-tag-but-leave-content.html
There can only be one form on the page (the asp form); you have to use that form somehow.
To clarify, there can only be one form processed.
Not with webforms, no. You have to work within the one, full page form by using an event handler connected to a Button to LinkButton. Fortunately, it's pretty easy to do:
foo.aspx:
...
<asp:TextBox id="txtFoo" runat="server" />
<asp:Button id="btnFoo" runat="server" onclick="btnFoo_Click />
...
foo.aspx.cs:
...
protected void btnFoo_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
string s = txtFoo.Text;
// do something with s
}
...
Dino Esposito has an article from MSDN magazine that covers handling multiple forms or "simulating" sub forms in ASP.Net that might just answer all your questions.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc164151.aspx
Any work around would be hacky and very ugly. By design asp.net uses a form tag to post and get data. This is why they call it a Web Forms Application. Html does not allow nested forms. What you want to do is use a WebRequest in your code behind.
If you are trying something like a paypal button you could simply use something like this.
Markup:
<div id="PayPalButtonContainer" runat="server"></div>
Code Behind:
public static string GetPayPalButtonMarkup()
{
const string markup = #"https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr
?cmd=_xclick&business={0}
&item_name=Widget
&amount={1}
¤cy_code=USD";
return markup;
}
PayPalButtonContainer.InnerHtml = string.format(GetPayPalButtonMarkup,"YOUR PAYPAL USER NAME", "YOUR PRICE VALUE");
you either have to deal with the postback by adding a server side click event handler to what you want to be the "sub forms" submit button (this is how web formas deals with multiple submit type buutons on the same page) or do soemthing clever with AJAX if you dont want a full post back
I've run across this issue before. One workaround that I have done is to place my code that I want my action to be done upon inside of an asp:Panel. With the panel you can set the attribute of "DefaultButton" to a button inside of the panel, and clicking the button (or pressing "enter") will fire that button's click event. I've found this quite handy when wanting to submit a "form" by pressing enter when I have a master page that contains the only allowable asp:Form.
Hope this helps.
When I first came across this problem, I found the simplest solution for me was to simple COPY and PASTE the Master page and give it a slightly different name, something like:
SiteNameMasterPage 'Default page with FORM tag
SiteNameMasterPageNF 'No Form tag
And then depending on wether I wanted a FORM tag or or not, simply change the masterpage link at the top of my CONTENT-PAGES, like this
<%# Page Title="" Language="VB" MasterPageFile="~/SiteName.master" %>
<%# MasterType VirtualPath="~/SiteName.master" %>
<!-- This masterpage has the default FORM tag -->
or
<%# Page Title="" Language="VB" MasterPageFile="~/SiteNameNF.master" %>
<%# MasterType VirtualPath="~/SiteNameNF.master" %>
<!-- This masterpage does NOT have the default FORM tag -->
and then in the content page, wherever I want to place my form I can include the <form> tag
OK, another road bump in my current project.
I have never had form elements in both my master and content pages, I tend to have all the forms in the content where relevant.
In the current project however, we have a page where they want both. A login form at the top right, and a questions form in the content.
Having tried to get this in, I have run in to the issue of ASP.NET moaning about the need for a single form element in a master page. TBH, I really dont get why this is a requirement on ASP.NET's part, but hey ho.
Does anyone know if/how I can get the master and content pages to contain form elements that work independantly?
If not, can you offer advice on how to proceed to get the desired look/functionality?
Thought I would review some of my outstanding questions and see if I can close some of them off.
This one was an interesting one. I outright refused to believe you can only have one form on an ASP.NET page. This to me made no sense. I have seen plenty of webpages that have more than one form on a web page, why should an ASP.NET page be any different?
So, it got me thinking.
Why does a ASP.NET page need a form element?
ASP.NET pages try to emulate the WinForms environment, by provided state persistance through the PostBack model. This provides an element of state to a stateless environment. In order to do this, the runtime needs to be able to have the ability to maintain this state within each "form". It does this by posting back data to itself. It's important to note that:
There is nothing really fancy about a PostBack.
It uses a HTTP form and POST, the same as any other form, from any other stack.
Just because it looks like it might be doing something special, its not, all that happens is it POST's back with some info about what caused it, so you can do things like handle client-side events, in server-side code.
So why only one?
This to me was the million pound question (I am British). I understand that ASP.NET needs this, especially if you are using ASP.NET server controls, but why the hell can't I make my own additional forms?
So, I thought screw it, just make your own form!
And I did. I added a bog-standard, simple form with a submit action of "#". This then performs a POST to the current page, with the Form data for the given form in the request.
Guess what? It all worked fine. So I ended up with:
A master page, with a HTML form in
This form posts back to the current page (basically the page using the master).
In the Page_Load code-behind for the master, I then added code to check the request to see what data was passed in the request. If it contains data (say a hidden field) then I know the post was sourced from the Form on the master page, if not, then it is most liekly a PostBack from content, and can be ignored.
I then surrounded the Content tags with <form runat="server" id="aspNetForm"...> </form> tags. This meant that all content pages automatically had a form to work with.
This provided me with a relatively simple, clean solution to my problem. My login form works fine in tandem with all the content forms created, some of which are complex forms, others use lots of server controls and many PostBacks, and so on.
I hope this helps others.
the form tag itself is in the MasterPage, as such, you can code any asp.net server controls onto the master page that you wish. And you can write up the processing logic for those server controls on the master page's code behind file.
So, in your example, you can have the login controls on the upper right of the master page, and then have the authentication logic in the code page for the MASTER PAGE, not your content page.
This allows you to have the login controls on every page, and maintain that processing, as well as maintain the content controls and their processing on their individual pages.
Everyone else has already mentioned that you can only have a single form element in a given ASP.NET page, and that it would be contained in the master page. So far, so good. But I don't think that helps you get fully where you want to be ...
In your master pages, you've (I assume!) defined asp:ContentPlaceHolder controls. Your pages which use the master then have corresponding asp:Content tags. All your page content must go in these corresponding asp:Content tags.
Once in that tag, they are part of the master page's form. The master page can respond to events from its own controls, and the pages themselves respond to events from their own controls, and you're set.
If you need the page to interact with the master page, you can access it via the Page.Master property. To interact with any publicly-visible code (methods, properties, etc.) from the master page, you'd cast this property to the correct type, and access the publicly-visible code from there.
That should get you where you need to be in this scenario. (It's worked for me on multiple sites!)
Rob,
Interesting solution. I don't see any problem with what you are doing. The problem some may encounter however, is if they try to do this with 2 server forms. There's no rule in ASP.NET that you can't have more than 1 HTML form on a page, just that you can't have more than one "runat='server'" form on the page. Obviously you've found a pretty easy way of meeting your needs.
I've found that for the most part dealing with a single form is not a problem because the ASP.NET framework basically separates everything for us with naming containers. But in your initial post comment you hit on the important factor that was absent yet critical to the essence of the original question: enter key behavior. That always throws a monkey wrench into the works.
If you were to use a standard "all encompassing" server form, couldn't you capture the right action using a textbox text changed event? Of course, if the user changed both values before hitting enter on either you would get strange behavior. And I think the core problem with the enter key is that once you have more than one submit input on an HTML form, hitting ENTER in a textbox doesn't do anything. Only when there is a single INPUT element does the enter key cause one to be "clicked".
None of the previous answers gave a code example. Here's a simplified version of the Visual Studio 2012 Site.Master that illustrates how to do this:
<%# Master Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeBehind="Site - Copy.Master.cs" Inherits="WebApplication1.Site1Master" %>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head runat="server">
<title>This is a title</title>
<asp:ContentPlaceHolder runat="server" ID="HeadContent" />
</head>
<body>
<form runat="server">
<header>
<div class="content-wrapper">
<div class="float-right">
<section id="login">
<asp:LoginView runat="server" ViewStateMode="Disabled">
<AnonymousTemplate>
<asp:ContentPlaceHolder runat="server" ID="AnonContent" />
</AnonymousTemplate>
<LoggedInTemplate>
<asp:ContentPlaceHolder runat="server" ID="LoggedInContent" />
</LoggedInTemplate>
</asp:LoginView>
</section>
</div>
</div>
</header>
<div id="body">
<asp:ContentPlaceHolder runat="server" ID="FeaturedContent" />
<section class="content-wrapper main-content clear-fix">
<asp:ContentPlaceHolder runat="server" ID="MainContent" />
</section>
</div>
</form>
</body>
</html>
So you have everything wrapped by a single Form element, so you can place controls in the master page, yet your content pages can also use controls.
You can only have one form on an ASP.NET page. One way to handle this is to put an event handler on the login button in the master page. The handler will validate the user and redirect to the same page on success (to correctly run the Page_Load handler, which is run before event handlers).
I solved the "clicking the return key in the login sub-form causes the main form to submit" problem in my current project by embedding an iframe into the master page. The iframe pointed to the login.aspx page which authenticated the user.
<iframe id="login" src="login.aspx" frameborder="0" enableviewstate="false" scrolling="no" runat="server"></iframe>
(form some reason I needed the closing /iframe tag otherwise design view got confused)
You can access MasterPage controls from the aspx form by:
add the detractive tag to the aspx form <%# MasterType VirtualPath="~/Site.Master %>
and in the code behind use Master.FindControl(); to get the control by ID
for Example if you want to get the
Control form = Master.FindControl("form")
now you can use the master page's form in your code.
I hope this help.
Salve! In a similar thread, I posted an answer that might help you. You can use jquery to add content to an empty div. That content can include form tags, and even a submit function independant of anything the server-side code is doing. The only downside to this is if the user does not have javascript enabled!
Instead of reposting the same answer (and the code too), here is the link:
Jquery Ajax loading form on asp.net webform
This is a limitation of ASP.NET
ASP.NET is designed to have one form per page and only one form. When it was originally designed that was not a problem.
However since then this has been identified as a huge problem with accessibility.
Microsoft Fix for this was ASP.NET MVC, if you are able to I would suggest considering moving to ASP.NET MVC as it solves a large number of problems with ASP.NET
You can have more than 1 form. (just only 1 visiable at a time) codeline 1 = form 1 visable / form 2 hidden . Code 2 Form 2 visable / form 1 hidden. = solved (this is great for static contact forms as well
no, you can only have one asp.net form per page.
That has been the rule since 1.0
They should both share the same form