The web site is here.
See that blue bar behind the menu items? It's 40 pixels high and one pixel wide, and used as a repeating background - so, why does it look strange after the right-most menu item?
The image is here, if anyone needs it.
The image is used thusly:
.menu_bar
{
background-image: url("http://leonixsolutions.com/images/menu_background.jpg");
background-repeat: repeat-x;
font-size: large;
padding-left: 160px;
padding-top: 5px;
text-align: center;
}
Nothing is wrong with it,
Your menu container div.pd_menu_01 has a background color #ffffff remove it and you'll be fine...
The real problem here is that .pd_menu_01 extends too far to the right (and with its white background, covers the gradient). Try making it inline-block with an auto width, or something similar, so that it doesn't extend further to the right than it has to. You could also set its background color to transparent (but in my browser, .pd_menu_01 makes the page too wide and thus introduces unnecessary and ugly horizontal scrollbars, so the width solution is still relevant).
.pd_menu_01 has a background color of white declared, and is a div. Since divs are block level elements, they have a default width of 100%.
Either declare the div to be display:inline, wrap the menu in a span instead of a div, or make the background color transparent instead of white.
Related
I am trying to create a hover over image from a single split PNG
How do I enable it so when the image is not hovered over, the top image will view, but when they hover over, the bottom one will show.
The technique you are asking for is called "CSS-Sprites". Here's a tutorial
It uses the background-position style. For the default state of your element, just set the image as background. Note that you need a fixed height (half the height of your sprite) to hide the second part of the image. You also need a width, because your button will contain no content, just a background. For the hover state, use a negative background-position:
.button-foo{
display: block;
height: 29px;
width: 110px;
background: url("http://i.imgur.com/sJu5vvo.png") no-repeat scroll left top transparent;
}
.button-foo:hover{
background-position: 0 -29px;
}
This means the image is moved up so the top icon in there is above the visible area of your button.
Try to make sprites there is many applications out there. Google Css sprites generator.
Or try this one its free http://csssprites.com. Then its just simple css or jquery if u want any effects.
I actually wrote here a whole page of text, but it was impossible to understand and putting a jsfiddle is just easier for you guys.
here it is: http://jsfiddle.net/pMdZK/
the problem is links dont work, if they do hovers doesnt work and I have tried solutions like clearfix.
Both "container" and "default" divs are essential to me and they are actually 2 images that meant to overlap each other(one is half-transparent, gif image with some parts missing. that is to change that image later for other stuff, while user is in page.)
also changing
position:absolute
doesnt seem to do much either.
Changing the padding-top of all items into margin solves your problem. The reason is that padding extends the entire entity while margin pushes the other entity's away.
http://jsfiddle.net/pMdZK/1/
You had:
#containerx #pl6
{
padding: 521px 0 0 120px;
position: absolute;
font-size: 22px;
}
You need:
#containerx #pl6
{
margin: 521px 0 0 120px;
position: absolute;
font-size: 22px;
}
change this for every item ofc.
The difference between margin and padding:
Margins and padding can be confusing to the novice Web designer. After all, in some ways, they seem like the same thing: white space around an image or object.
Padding is the space inside the border between the border and the actual image or cell contents. In the image, the padding is the yellow area around the contents. Note that padding goes completely around the contents: there is padding on the top, bottom, right and left sides.
Margins are the spaces outside the border, between the border and the other elements next to this object. In the image, the margin is the red area outside the entire object. Note that, like the padding, the margin goes completely around the contents: there are margins on the top, bottom, right, and left sides.
To further explain the difference i made a quick jsfiddle.
http://jsfiddle.net/GRLkt/
The padding box expands the entire div. (as you can see by the background image).
The margin box pushes the other content away.
I have been using css for a few years but have never ventured past using fixed width layouts. I'm looking at using a fluid layout for my next site, or as much percentage as I can, but I have a question that worries me.
If I have an image with 1900px width set as a background, I understand that it simply shrinks when the browser calls for say 1600px.
What happens when the resolution calls for a 2000px width? I will be left with white space, correct? How can one avoid this? I feel like I should probably just throw out that its not an image that can be repeated horizontally.
A trick usually used is to have the image be "inner-glowed" with a color, then set the background color the same as well.
Suppose your image doesn't tile, and has black "inner-glow" or "feather" effect, then you can make the container's background color as such:
background-color: #000;
background-image: url(your_bgimage.jpg); /* image with black borders due to effect */
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: center center;
This question already has answers here:
CSS: Background image and padding
(9 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
I'd like to add a background to a div, position right center, but!, have some padding to the image. The div has padding for the text, so I want to indent the background a little. probably makes most sense w/ example:
http://jsbin.com/umuvud/edit#javascript,html,live
Thanks!
Updated Answer:
It's been commented multiple times that this is not the correct answer to this question, and I agree. Back when this answer was written, IE 9 was still new (about 8 months old) and many developers including myself needed a solution for <= IE 9. IE 9 is when IE started supporting background-origin. However, it's been over six and a half years, so here's the updated solution which I highly recommend over using an actual border. In case < IE 9 support is needed. My original answer can be found below the demo snippet. It uses an opaque border to simulate padding for background images.
#hello {
padding-right: 10px;
background-color:green;
background: url("https://placehold.it/15/5C5/FFF") no-repeat scroll right center #e8e8e8;
background-origin: content-box;
}
<p id="hello">I want the background icon to have padding to it too!I want the background icon twant the background icon to have padding to it too!I want the background icon to have padding to it too!I want the background icon to have padding to it too!</p>
Original Answer:
you can fake it with a 10px border of the same color as the background:
http://jsbin.com/eparad/edit#javascript,html,live
#hello {
border: 10px solid #e8e8e8;
background-color: green;
background: url("http://www.costascuisine.com/images/buttons/collapseIcon.gif")
no-repeat scroll right center #e8e8e8;
}
this is actually pretty easily done. You're almost there, doing what you've done with background-position: right center;. What is actually needed in this case is something very much like that. Let's convert these to percentages. We know that center=50%, so that's easy enough. Now, in order to get the padding you wanted, you need to position the background like so: background-position: 99% 50%.
The second, and more effective way of going about this, is to use the same background-position idea, and just use background-position: 400px (width of parent) 50%;. Of course, this method requires a static width, but will give you the same thing every time.
Method 1 (99% 50%)
Method 2 (400px 50%)
There is actually a native solution to this, using the four-values to background-position
.CssClass {background-position: right 10px top 20px;}
This means 10px from right and 20px from top.
you can also use three values the fourth value will be count as 0.
you can use background-origin:padding-box; and then add some padding where you want, for example: #logo {background-image: url(your/image.jpg); background-origin:padding-box; padding-left: 15%;}
This way you attach the image to the div padding box that contains it so you can position it wherever you want.
In case anyone else needs to add padding to something with background-image and background-size: contain or cover, I used the following which is a nice way of doing it. You can replace the border-width with 10% or 2vw or whatever you like.
.bg-image {
background: url("/image/logo.png") no-repeat center #ffffff / contain;
border: inset 10px transparent;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
This means you don't have to define a width.
first off, to be a bit of a henpeck, its best NOT to use just the <background> tag. rather, use the proper, more specific, <background-image> tag.
the only way that i'm aware of to do such a thing is to build the padding into the image by extending the matte. since the empty pixels aren't stripped, you have your padding right there. so if you need a 10px border, create 10px of empty pixels all around your image. this is mui simple in Photoshop, Fireworks, GIMP, &c.
i'd also recommend trying out the PNG8 format instead of the dying GIF... much better.
there may be an alternate solution to your problem if we knew a bit more of how you're using it. :) it LOOKS like you're trying to add an accordion button. this would be best placed in the HTML because then you can target it with JavaScript/PHP; something you cannot do if it's in the background (at least not simply). in such a case, you can style the heck out of the image you currently have in CSS by using the following:
#hello img { padding: 10px; }
WR!
To add space before background image, one could define the 'width' of element which is using 'background-image' object. And then to define a pixel value in 'background-position' property to create space from left side.
For example, I'd a scenario where I got a navigation menu which had a bullet before link item and the bullet graphic were changeable if corrosponding link turns into an active state. Further, the active link also had a background-color to show, and this background-color had approximate 15px padding both on left and right side of link item (so on left, it includes bullet icon of link too).
While padding-right fulfill the purpose to have background-color stretched upto 15px more on right of link text. The padding-left only added to space between link text and bullet.
So I took the width of background-color object from PSD design (for ex. 82px) and added that to li element (in a class created to show active state) and then I set background-position value to 20px. Which resulted in bullet icon shifted inside from the left edge. And its provided me desired output of having left padding before bullet icon used as background image.
Please note, you may need to adjust your padding / margin values accordingly, which may used either for space between link items or for spacing between bullet icon and link text.
I need to place an icon of 48x48 as background. I have this icon in my image sprite where of course there are many other images.
Is there a way to show as background only a porition of the image?
thanks
EDIT: Is there a way to do this without setting width-height of the backgrounded element? (I am not sure if acutally i can set a width-height)
Edit2: this is what i need: http://jsfiddle.net/pdxnj/
Thanks
Set the width and height of the element to 48px.
.element{
width: 48px;
height: 48px;
}
Set the background of the element to your image
.element{
background-image: url('image.png');
}
Move the background so that the top left corner of the icon is positioned correctly.
.element{
background-position: 20px 94px;
}
The two numbers in background-position are the X and Y coordinates (respectively) where the top left corner of your 48px by 48px is in your sprite image. So maybe it's actually 96px 0px or something.
EDIT
If you can't control the width and height of the element you are trying to put the background in, but you can add new DOM elements, you can try adding a span inside the element you really want to put the image as a background for.
It would look something like:
<div id="noControl">
<span id="justCreated">
</span>
</div>
and the CSS would look exactly the same as above, except you would need to treat the inline span as a block element:
#justCreated{
display: inline-block;
}
EDIT 2
If you have control over new DOM elements, and want to make your sprite the background without messing with a span, just add another div inside your original one.
Would wind up looking like:
<div id="noControl">
<div id="justCreated">
ALL of the content that used to be inside #noControl
</div>
</div>
and the CSS for it would be
#justCreated{
width: 48px;
height: 48px;
background-image: url('image.png');
background-position: 96px 0px;
z-index: -200;
/* z-index of all the contents needs to be not set, or set to larger than -200 */
}
This is all theoretical, but it SHOULD work.
This way, you can apply the sprite sizing to a block element without messing with the inline stuff. This may affect CSS if it addresses elements by child status (like #noControl > a), because you are inserting a div between the parent and the child.
I am still researching whether you can do this at all if you have no control over the DOM at all.
simple answer no, but by using html elements you can. Html element hight and width should match the background portion of image.
You can if you're not going to be setting a repeating background. Otherwise no.
To do this, you need to play around with the background offset, and width/height of the actual element that you're setting the background on.
it will depend on how much whitespace is around it in the sprite whether it will fit where you need it to without showing parts of other images.. however you could e.g. put a span where you want the image and crop the span to 48x48 so that it only shows the icon itself. it kind of depends what you want to use it for and how the sprite is built
It's better using ::before or ::after so you can easily define your image size without having overflow problems!
This is possible. You need to display that in a 48x48 div then set position: absolute style for the div and define left and top too for it. Also set z-index: 0 for the div so that it appears under everything.