Im trying to adapt some code that I have found online that uses this function..
$common.parseUnit
Does anyone know where it lives as at present I am getting an "$common.parseUnit is undefined" error when the code hits that line.
Thanks.
$common.parseUnit() is exposed by the common scripts of the ASP.NET AJAX Control Toolkit, so you probably need to install that toolkit.
EDIT: If you have the toolkit installed, check if you have properly referenced the common toolkit scripts, either by decorating your extender classes with:
[RequiredScript(typeof(CommonToolkitScripts))]
Or by explicitly adding the reference to your ToolkitScriptManager:
yourToolkitScriptManager.Scripts.Add(new ScriptReference("Common.Common.js",
"AjaxControlToolkit"));
Related
I am developing web based application using asp.net and ajax. Today I am facing an issue, while dragging and dropping the ajax based components under the ajax enabled webform.
The error message is
The operation could not be completed. Invalid FORMATETC structure
If your answer is assembly then please let me know which assembly such issues (be specific about assemblies)
It is basically due to Ajax Toolkit assembly if you have added it as toolbox. Only way to get rid of this is to restart your IDE , whenever your have Formatetc error , or unload the toolbox and recreate it. Either of them will solve the. But it will not go. Occurance will become rare. Hope this help.
Ajax toolkit version < 3.5 seen such bugs.
If you using AjaxControlToolkit.dll try remove it and redownload and adding again.
Also try re-install Ajax Control Toolkit, which might solve your problem.
first Check in control panel => administrative tool => .net framework . your internet priority is low then change it
Can anyone help point me to some good resources for working with Unity 2.0 in an ASP.NET that doesn't talk about ASP.NET MVC?!?
We are not using MVC and I am struggling to get Unity to inject dependencies into my pages following the couple of examples I've read (which are all based on David Hayden's work so they are all presenting the same examples and code).
UPDATE
I tried to go the PageHandlerFactory route but the example (here) is incomplete and no source code is available to accompany the article.
So, I decided to try the custom HttpModule approach described here and here. Again, no source code is available beyond what is shown so it is difficult to troubleshoot issues.
The problem I have now is that all of the plumbing appears to be wiring up correctly but the Buildup method does nothing to my page. I can see all of the types are registered in the container when I set a break-point in the module code and the code is executing as expected. But a break-point in the Page_Load event handler shows that the dependencies are all null.
The property in question is public, with a setter and getter, and is marked with the Dependency attribute. I've tried with and without the attribute, with and without a mapping name, ... every combination I could think of and nothing works.
What am I missing???
It depends what you expect. Most exemples targeting MVC present custom controller factory which allows creating controllers with dependency injection. This is indeed also possible with web forms but instead of controller you must inject dependencies into pages. To do this you must replace PageHandlerFactory with custom implementation.
You can create your own implementation of PageHandlerFactory which will be able to resolve pages directly and inject dependencies defined in constructor or you can use one of these (here, here and here) which instead uses stantandard PageHandlerFactory and builds page instance (resolve property dependencies).
Hi I have created a user control which is inside a folder called Controls and the class is a partial class which inherits from Web.UI.UserControl. Now from my page which is one level up I just try to access the method inside the usercontrol and so trying to cast it as the type of user control.
But I get build errors. It just cannot recognize that class. I get Type not defined error. But at times it has recognized the class. Dont know why it does that.
Hi Finally I was able to resolve the issue by converting to web application from a website. Now it works exactly as desired. I think there are problems with visual studio website apps. As far as I have read websites do not have as robust support as web app has. So thankyou all for your comments. Finally the flakiness is gone.
Hey I am coding using Visual Studio 2003. My program worked fine until I introduced a dll I made using CreateObject.
Code:
Set docs2 = server.CreateObject("DocGetter.Form1")
docs2.GetDocument oXMLDom,numID
It appears to be getting stuck at this code. I've already used regasm to register the dll.
What else could be wrong?
Add a reference to the dll in your project and instantiate the object like this:
Dim docs2 As New DocGetter.Form1()
If that doesn't make sense, then fix it so it does. There's no good reason to use CreateObject in .Net code. (Okay, that's hyperbole. But the principal is sound).
Can you clarify - is this a web app or a client (winform) app? Form1 sounds like a winform. ASP.NET runs at the server, so showing a form would be inappropriate - it would happen at the server, not the client. In short, don't do this!
I also can't see where "stored procedures" figures in this, so I've removed the tag.
What are you trying to do? Options for showing something more complex at the client include:
dhtml
flash
silverlight
clickonce [requires windows client]
ocx [not recommended]
I'd bet money that this function isn't defined with this name and/or parameters.
docs2.GetDocument oXMLDom,numID
But because of the way you're instantiating the object, the compiler has no way of knowing this... I think.
I'm currently using Microsoft Code Contracts in an ASP.NET MVC application without any issues but I can not seem to get it quite running in a basic ASP.NET Web site. I'm not entirely sure it was made to work with this type of project (although it shouldn't matter) so I wanted to bring it up to everyone.
I can compile the contracts just fine but the code skips over them since I'm assuming it hasn't been enabled through the Properties Page like you would do in other project types (ie ASP.NET MVC). I've gone to the property page of the project (which displays a dialog instead of the typical properties page) in my ASP.NET web site but it does not yield the same menu options and as such, doesn't have a section devoted to Code Contracts.
Also, I have Microsoft Code Contracts properly enabled within a class library project that I use to separate my business logic from the web site. The contracts compile fine but when a contract is violated, it throws a rather uninformative "Exception of type 'System.ExecutionEngineException' was thrown" error with no inner exception. My contract specifies a message to display upon violation but it is nowhere within the exception. It simply halts the execution of the process (which I believe is the default functionality for Microsoft Code Contracts).
I can't find anywhere that explicitly states that a particular project type can or can't (or shouldn't) be used with Contracts so I just wanted to see if anyone has had this issue.
Thanks for any help!
I had the same problem and this is how I solved it:
In the Referenced Class Libraries, right click -> properties -> code contracts.
Make sure "perform contract checking" is checked. I had mine set to "Full"
Contract Reference Assembly: make sure it is set to "Build"
Save your changes.
In the Referenced Class Libraries that have no contracts in their code, set the Contract Reference Assembly to "Do Not Build".
Then in the MVC project, have the Code Contracts "perform contract checking" checked. I had mine set to "Full".
Hope that helps somebody.
This sounds less like a Contracts and more like a build/config issue. Have you tried to deploy a prebuilt website? Are you sure that your website code sees the contracts code? Is the ASP.NET runtime using the CLR 4.0, or does it see the earlier Microsoft.Contracts.dll? Etc.