Given the following interface
public interface ISomething {
void DoMany(string[] strs);
void DoManyRef(ref string[] strs);
}
I would like to verify that the DoManyRef method is called, and passed any string array as the strs parameter. The following test fails:
public void CanVerifyMethodsWithArrayRefParameter() {
var a = new Mock<ISomething>().Object;
var strs = new string[0];
a.DoManyRef(ref strs);
var other = It.IsAny<string[]>();
Mock.Get(a).Verify(t => t.DoManyRef(ref other));
}
While the following not requiring the array passed by reference passes:
public void CanVerifyMethodsWithArrayParameter() {
var a = new Mock<ISomething>().Object;
a.DoMany(new[] { "a", "b" });
Mock.Get(a).Verify(t => t.DoMany(It.IsAny<string[]>()));
}
I am not able to change the interface to eliminate the by reference requirement.
For verifying against ref arguments, you need to pass the actual instance into the verify call. This means your first test should appear as follows:
[Test]
public void CanVerifyMethodsWithArrayRefParameter()
{
var a = new Mock<ISomething>().Object;
var strs = new string[0];
a.DoManyRef(ref strs);
Mock.Get(a).Verify(t => t.DoManyRef(ref strs));
}
The final sentence of the question leads me to believe you might not be able to make that change, but that is what is required for the Verify call to succeed. Hope this helps.
Related
my first question is here
however since I was advised that questions should not change the original matter I created a new one.
I am saving user settings and I would like to save it in the list, I have had a look on setting by James however I found that that its not possible to save it in the list. So ia have decided to use Xamarin Essentials.
First I tried to save only a string value, which after some struggle I managed to work out and now I am trying to save an object
static void AddToList(SettingField text)
{
var savedList = new List<SettingField>(Preference.SavedList);
savedList.Add(text);
Preference.SavedList = savedList;
}
private void ExecuteMultiPageCommand(bool value)
{
var recognitionProviderSettings = new RecognitionProviderSettings
{SettingFields = new List<SettingField>()};
var set = new SettingField()
{
ProviderSettingId = "test",
Value = "test"
};
AddToList(set);
NotifyPropertyChanged("IsMultiPage");
}
and then the sterilization and des
public static class Preference
{
private static SettingField _settingField;
public static List<SettingField> SavedList
{
get
{
//var savedList = Deserialize<List<string>>(Preferences.Get(nameof(SavedList), "tesr"));
var savedList = Newtonsoft.Json.JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<SettingField>(Preferences.Get(nameof(SavedList), _settingField)) ;
SavedList.Add(savedList);
return SavedList ?? new List<SettingField>();
}
set
{
var serializedList = Serialize(value);
Preferences.Set(nameof(SavedList), serializedList);
}
}
static T Deserialize<T>(string serializedObject) => JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<T>(serializedObject);
static string Serialize<T>(T objectToSerialize) => JsonConvert.SerializeObject(objectToSerialize);
}
}
But Preferences.Get doesn't take object, is there any other way how can I save my setting to a object list? Please advise
I would recommend you to use SecureStorage. You can save your strings only into it. So the place where you have serilized your object as json. Just convert your json to string with .ToString() and save it into secure storage.
You may continue saving your serialized json object as string in Shared preferences but it is recommended to use SecureStorage Instead.
I am writing unit tests for my asp.net web API application and one of them is trying to verify that AddOrGetExisting is working correctly. According to the MSDN documentation, AddOrGetExisting returns an item if it's already saved, and if not it should write it into Cache.
The problem I am having is that if I add the key to MemoryCache object from an unit test, then call AddOrGetExisting, it will always return null and overwrite the value instead of returning the value that is already saved. I am verifying that the value is in the cache right before I call AddOrGetExisting(bool isIn evaluates to true).
Here is the code for my memory cache and the test method. Any help would be much appreciated:
public static class RequestCache
{
public static TEntity GetFromCache<TEntity>(string key, Func<TEntity> valueFactory) where TEntity : class
{
ObjectCache cache = MemoryCache.Default;
var newValue = new Lazy<TEntity>(valueFactory);
CacheItemPolicy policy = new CacheItemPolicy { AbsoluteExpiration = DateTimeOffset.Now.AddMinutes(60) };
bool isIn = cache.Contains(key);
// Returns existing item or adds the new value if it doesn't exist
var value = cache.AddOrGetExisting(key, newValue, policy) as Lazy<TEntity>;
return (value ?? newValue).Value;
}
}
public string TestGetFromCache_Helper()
{
return "Test3and4Values";
}
[TestMethod]
public void TestGetFromCache_ShouldGetItem()
{
ObjectCache cache = MemoryCache.Default;
CacheItemPolicy policy = new CacheItemPolicy { AbsoluteExpiration = DateTimeOffset.Now.AddMinutes(60) };
var cacheKey = "Test3";
var expectedValue = "Test3Value";
cache.AddOrGetExisting(cacheKey, expectedValue, policy);
var result = Models.RequestCache.GetFromCache(cacheKey,
() =>
{
return TestGetFromCache_Helper();
});
Assert.AreEqual(expectedValue, result);
}
The issue may be that you're passing a Lazy<TEntity> as newValue within RequestCache.GetFromCache but passing a string as expectedValue in the test method.
When running the test, the cache.Contains(key) confirms that there is a value stored for that key, which is true. However it is a string instead of a Lazy<TEntity>. Apparently AddOrGetExisting decides to overwrite the value in that case.
The fix for this particular scenario may be to adjust the expectedValue assignment in your test to something like this:
var expectedValue = new Lazy<string>(TestGetFromCache_Helper);
You'd also need to pull the value from the Lazy in the test's final equality comparison, for example:
Assert.AreEqual(expectedValue.Value, result);
I have code like this:
//Fields
Product _prod, _existingProd;
void Test()
{
_prod = MakeAndPopulateSomeRandomProduct();
_existingProd = GetProdFromDb(1);
Mapper.CreateMap()
.AfterMap((s, d) =>
{
Console.WriteLine(d==_existingProd); //Why does this print false?
//Customize other properties on destination object
});
Mapper.Map(_prod, _existingProd);
}
When I call Test(), false is printed but I expected true. In my scenario, it is important to be able to access the original destination object via the AfterMap argument. I only included the fields to demonstrate the problem but in my real code, I don't have direct access to them. How can I access the object instances passed in to Map() when customizing the mapping?
The following example works. Probably you are using some type converter which creates new instance... Also please provide all mapping configurations to better understand the problem.
[TestFixture]
public class AfterMap_Test
{
//Fields
private Product _prod, _existingProd;
[Test]
public void Test()
{
Mapper.CreateMap<Product, Product>()
.AfterMap((s, d) =>
{
Trace.WriteLine(d == _existingProd); //Why does this print false?
//Customize other properties on destination object
});
_existingProd = new Product {P1 = "Destination"};
_prod = new Product {P1 = "Source"};
Mapper.Map(_prod, _existingProd);
}
}
internal class Product
{
public string P1 { get; set; }
}
I'm trying to verify a method call using Moq, but I can't quite get the syntax right. Currently, I've got this as my verify:
repository.Verify(x => x.ExecuteNonQuery("fav_AddFavorites", new
{
fid = 123,
inputStr = "000456"
}), Times.Once());
The code compiles, but the test fails with the error:
Expected invocation on the mock once, but was 0 times:
x => x.ExecuteNonQuery("fav_AddFavorites", new <>f__AnonymousType0<Int32, String>(123, "000456"))
No setups configured.
Performed invocations:
IRepository.ExecuteNonQuery("fav_AddFavorites", { fid = 123, inputStr = 000456 })
How can I verify the method call and match the method parameters for an anonymous type?
UPDATE
To answer the questions:
I am trying to verify both that the method was called and that the parameters are correct.
The signature of the method I'm trying to verify is:
int ExecuteNonQuery(string query, object param = null);
The setup code is simply:
repository = new Mock<IRepository>();
UPDATE 2
It looks like this is a problem with Moq and how it handles anonymous types in .Net. The code posted by Paul Matovich runs fine, however, once the code and the test are in different assemblies the test fails.
This Passes
public class Class1
{
private Class2 _Class2;
public Class1(Class2 class2)
{
_Class2 = class2;
}
public void DoSomething(string s)
{
_Class2.ExecuteNonQuery(s, new { fid = 123, inputStr = "000456" });
}
}
public class Class2
{
public virtual void ExecuteNonQuery(string s, object o)
{
}
}
/// <summary>
///A test for ExecuteNonQuery
///</summary>
[TestMethod()]
public void ExecuteNonQueryTest()
{
string testString = "Hello";
var Class2Stub = new Mock<Class2>();
Class1 target = new Class1(Class2Stub.Object);
target.DoSomething(testString);
Class2Stub.Verify(x => x.ExecuteNonQuery(testString, It.Is<object>(o => o.Equals(new { fid = 123, inputStr = "000456" }))), Times.Once());
}
##Update##
That is strange, it doesn't work in different assemblies. Someone can give us the long definition about why the object.equals from different assemblies behaves differently, but for different assemblies, this will work, any variance in the object values will return a different hash code.
Class2Stub.Verify(x => x.ExecuteNonQuery(testString, It.Is<object>(o => o.GetHashCode() == (new { fid = 123, inputStr = "000456" }).GetHashCode())), Times.Once());
One option is to "verify" it in a Callback. Obviously this needs to be done at Setup time, e.g.:
aMock.Setup(x => x.Method(It.IsAny<object>())).Callback<object>(
(p1) =>
{
dynamic o = p1;
Assert.That(o.Name, Is.EqualTo("Bilbo"));
});
None of the answers are great when your test assembly is different than the system under test's assembly (really common). Here's my solution that uses JSON serialization and then strings comparison.
Test Helper Function:
using Newtonsoft.Json;
public static class VerifyHelper
{
public static bool AreEqualObjects(object expected, object actual)
{
var expectedJson = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(expected);
var actualJson = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(actual);
return expectedJson == actualJson;
}
}
Example System Under Test:
public void DoWork(string input)
{
var obj = new { Prop1 = input };
dependency.SomeDependencyFunction(obj);
}
Example Unit Test:
var expectedObject = new { Prop1 = "foo" };
sut.DoWork("foo");
dependency.Verify(x => x.SomeDependencyFunction(It.Is<object>(y => VerifyHelper.AreEqualObjects(expectedObject, y))), Times.Once());
This solution is really simple, and I think makes the unit test easier to understand as opposed to the other answers in this thread. However, because it using simple string comparison, the test's anonymous object has to be set up exactly the same as the system under the test's anonymous object. Ergo, let's say you only cared to verify the value of a single property, but your system under test sets additional properties on the anonymous object, your unit test will need to set all those other properties (and in the same exact order) for the helper function to return true.
I created a reusable method based on Pauls answer:
object ItIsAnonymousObject(object value)
{
return It.Is<object>(o => o.GetHashCode() == value.GetHashCode());
}
...
dependency.Verify(
x => x.SomeDependencyFunction(ItIsAnonymousObject(new { Prop1 = "foo" })),
Times.Once());
Also, this can be used for property name case-insensitive comparison:
protected object ItIsAnonymousObject(object value)
{
var options = new JsonSerializerOptions { PropertyNamingPolicy = JsonNamingPolicy.CamelCase };
return It.Is<object>(o => JsonSerializer.Serialize(o, options) == JsonSerializer.Serialize(value, options));
}
I think I've established that in as3corelib JSON.decode I have no choice but to deserialise to a plain old flex object.
var data:Object = JSON.decode(json);
If I then want to get the data contained in the object into another type I can't use type casting. I have to instantiate a new instance and add the properties manually.
var data:Object = JSON.decode(json);
var model:Model = new Model();
model.name = data.name;
model.notes = data.notes;
A pain and a bit ugly, but I'm guessing this is the price to be paid for going from untyped json to a flex type. My first question is whether my assumption is correct and there is no prettier way to create my model instance with the data contained within the json?
My second question, if so then before I write my own method to do this, is there anything inside the flex api that will take the data object and mixin it's values to my model instance?
Cheers,
Chris
the approach I've always used proved to be part of the AMF3 serialization mechanism in ActionScript.
have a look at IExternalizable and registerClassAlias.
now what I use is the following:
interface ISerializable {
public function getRawData():Object;
public function setRawData(param:Object):void;
}
function registerType(id:String, type:Class):void {
//implementation
}
function getTypeByID(id:String):Class {
//implementation
}
function getTypeID(type:Class):String {
//implementation
}
and to the decoder/encoder you register a class alias.
serialization of an object works as follows:
var raw:Object = model.getRawData();
raw[" type"] = getTypeID(model);
var encoded:String = JSON.encode(raw);
decoding works as follows:
var raw:Object = JSON.decode(raw);
var cl:Class = getTypeByID(raw[" type"]);
if (cl == null) throw new Error("no class registered for type: "+raw[" type"]);
delete raw[" type"];
var model:ISerializable = new cl();
model.setRawData(raw);
you will need to do this recursively on the whole deserialized JSON tree, starting at the leafs.
For cyclic reference, you'll need a trick.
I had an implementation of this somewhere, but I can't find it.
You can loop within the field of you json decoded object and assign them into your model:
function json2model(json:String):Model{
var data:Object = JSON.decode(json);
var m:Model=new Model();
for (var field:String in data) {
if (m.hasOwnProperty(field)) {
m[field] = data[field];
}
}
return m;
}
var model:Model=json2model(json)
or add a static function within your Model if you preffer:
public class Model {
//...
public static function fromJSon(json:String):Model {
var data:Object = JSON.decode(json);
var m:Model=new Model();
for (var field:String in data) {
if (m.hasOwnProperty(field)) {
m[field] = data[field];
}
}
return m;
}
}
}
var model:Model=Model.fromJSon(json);