I've got two content types, both have a node title and a document attachment, the doc attachment fields are different names (being from two different content types).
In my view, I'm displaying the node title and the file name in a table. The node titles are great all in one column, but the two content typed attachment fields are displaying in two separate columns, making three columns total when there should only be two. Every row has a single doc title, but one or the other column is always blank now depending on which content type's doc title is displayed.
How can I combine these two fields to display in the same column so it looks seamless? It is not important to know that these docs came from two different content types. These are organized by larger taxonomy terms so it's not feasible to just do two different views.
Alas, the answer was right in the views help:
Column
By default, each field is its own
column. However, you can place
multiple fields in the same column. To
do this, pick which field you want to
represent the column, then pick
another field and set the 'column'
value to that field. You can place as
many fields as you like in a single
column, but only the main field in a
column can be click-sorted.
I found this answer and it works for me:
http://drupal.org/node/1120304#comment-5111606
You can use any field as a token in another field in the default Views module.
So if you want to concat text fields together, say you have field A with value "Hello" and field B with value "World" and you want a concat field with value "Hello World":
1) Edit field A, choose exclude from display, do the same thing with field B
2) Create field C as Global: Text and ensure that it is ordered after field A and field B (you can only use fields as tokens if they are defined before the target field).
3) You can now see the replacement patterns available to you just under the value textarea in field C. It will be something like [field A] [field B]
Now if you want to calculate a number field based on 2 other fields the method is similar to concat, except for field C you would use the Global: Math Expression field:
1) Edit field A, choose exclude from display, do the same thing with field B
2) Create field C as Global: Math Expression and ensure that it is ordered after field A and field B (you can only use fields as tokens if they are defined before the target field).
3) You can now see the replacement patterns available to you just under the value textarea in field C. It will be something like [field A]+[field B]
Related
In NetSuite, I am setting up a new (currently untitled) saved search that is meant to display three columns simultaneously: Invoice document number, Sales Order document number and Item Fulfillment document number.
I have configured my transaction saved search to display invoice document type. Sales Order document number is called Created From which is a NetSuite-created field and displays normally as desired.
There is a field called Document Number, unfortunately it responds closely to the criteria setting whether document types are set to Invoice or set to Item Fulfillment. Setting both does not meet my desired output.
I believe there is a way to somehow have all three document numbers present in the same saved search as their own unique columns.
While editing the saved search, I have attempted to create a new column called "Formula (text)" which is a field containing the formula {number}, this column appears as a second Invoice document number instead of the desired Item Fulfillment document number.
While editing the saved search, I have also tried another "Formula (text)" field containing the formula {tranid} which also results as another Invoice document number column instead of the desired Item Fulfillment document number.
Result of both above attempts: https://i.ibb.co/KyDP7Z5/2019-06-12-13-55-58-Window.png
I tried going to Customization > Lists, Records & Fields > Transaction Line Fields to create a new custom field, containing the above as defaulted formulas. The result is exactly that of the above image.
I tried going to Customization > Lists, Records & Fields > Transaction Body Fields to create a new custom field, where the content is referenced by another Saved Search. I expected that if I can pick the document number column from the "item fulfillment lookup" saved search, then that would appear as a separate column bearing the Item Fulfillment number.
I marked the document number column inside the "item fulfillment lookup" saved search as the summary type: "group" as well as give this saved search "Document Number" as an available filter in order for the "item fulfillment lookup" saved search to appear for custom columns.
Unfortunately, this yielded an empty blank column.
I know and I admit that I am doing something incorrect and would much appreciate it if there is an alternative solution or workaround to achieve this desired objective (all three document numbers to appear in a single saved search).
In your saved search Columns, at the end of the drop down list where you choose the columns, you can choose related records fields.
You didn't say which record your search is based on, but assuming your search criteria is on Sales Order, then you can use the following:
To get the related Item Fulfillment:
Fulfilling/Receiving Transaction Fields ... and then choose Document Number
To get the related Invoice:
Applying Transaction fields ... and then choose Document Number
I have a 54 pages PDF file. In this PDF, I have some fields like Full Name, the Phone number, etc that repeats more than 10 times. How can do like When I enter Full name one time and all of the remaining full name fields can be filled automatically using Adobe Acrobat?
I hope I asked my question clearly. Thank you for your time and help.
The easiest is, when all properties of the field (font type, size, color, etc.) are the same, to simply copy the field to the other pages.
The field value is a so-called field level property, which will be the same for all instances of the field.
If you want to have only one place where the value can be entered, and the dependent fields should be read-only, you would have to have a different name for the entry field and display fields. In the entry field, you would then add the following line of code in either the Format or onBlur event:
this.getField("myDisplayFields").value = event.value ;
And that should push the value from the entry field to all fields named myDisplayFields.
And that's it…
I am displaying a list of purchase orders and each "line item" corresponding to it so its basically nested in a table.
ie:
PO# | Item | Qty Ordered | Qty Received |
1
123 20 [form Field]
345 10 [form field]
5
232 5 [form field]
What I am trying to do is provide a single (unmapped) field for each line item called "quantity received" which the user will type a number in there and save the form. I currently setup my code to have a few collection types nested. For example, my initial FormType starts with my user. Then users have "PurchaseOrders" so I add a collection type of "PurchaseOrders" (PurchaseOrderType), then inside that PurchaseOrderType I have a collectiontype of PurchaseOrderItems (PurchaseOrderItemType) (these are the line items). In that form type I have a single unmapped field called "quantityReceived" (NumberType).
Everything seems to work fine with the form except I dont have a way to place the correct field in the correct row in the table. In my template I have a nested loop to loop through my PurchaseOrders and their corresponding PurchaseOrderItems for the purpose of displaying data in the table shown below. How can I render the correct form field in line with the data I am already displaying? The problem is that collections create field names using sequential index numbers starting with [0], so that does not correspond to the ID of the "PurchaseOrderItem" so as I am looping through each PurchaseOrderItem i feel like I dont have a reliable way to select the correct form field to place into that row.
So it seems that I have resolved this issue by instead of looping through my entities, I loop through my form instead and access the necessary variables for display purposes by using form.fieldName.vars.value.[propertyName]
I have a Drupal 7 view similar to the one described here: Drupal 7 Views - list group by field
I wish to have all the groupby fields always appear even if there are not members of them and ideally I wish to put a default value in such a list.
eg:
Foo:
-Jay
-George
Bar:
-Barry
Boo:
Sorry no entries at this time!
Suggestions?
If none of what you are fetching with the view is associated with the group 'Boo' then the view doesnt know it exists, so would never be able to show it but say there is no results for it.
What i would recommend is creating a taxonomy vocabulary with the terms: Foo, Bar, Boo.
In whatever content type your names belong to, create a term reference field, and link them to the terms.
In the view, fetch the taxonomy terms, create a relationship to the content type that references the taxonomy, and pull those through based on that. There is a setting in views for multiple results to combine into one field (so you would want to do that). Then you could add the 'Sorry no entries at this time!' as a field's no results text.
So to recap: VIEW => TAXONOMY TERMS => NAME CONTENT
I have five multigroup fields each one are displayed by a conditional field with a 1 to 5 value. If I select for example 2 there's a select list field appearing with is selected data , if i select 1 there's another one with an another select data.
How do I display with wiews only the content of the choosen value of the conditional field.
Thank you.
The simplest way of doing this, would be to create the logic in your theme. There are many ways of doing this, one would be to add all of the possible fields, but exclude them from display, and only show the conditional field. In one of the preprocess functions for the view, you could check the raw data for the conditional field, and replace either the field, or just the the themed value, with the value of the field you want to display.