I am creating a RSS Feed application based on a data, and I have the following:
I have an ArrayCollection that is pre-populated with data. I am sorting through the ArrayCollection, get 1 piece of data (condition), and need to connect to an RSS feed which returns me the title, and I set my ArrayCollection in correspondence to condition -> title.
public function updateArrayList(list:ArrayCollection):ArrayCollection {
trace(list);
for(var i:int = 0; i < list.length; i++) {
// Alert.show(list.getItemAt(i).condition);
getRSSUpdate(list.getItemAt(i).condition);
list.getItemAt(i).title = getRSS.lastResult.article.title;
}
return list;
}
public function getRSSUpdate(condition:String):void {
getRSS = new HTTPService();
getRSSParam = new Object;
getRSSParam.condition = condition;
getRSS.method = "POST";
getRSS.url = "http://localhost/site/remoteRequests/flash/rss/getRSS.php";
getRSS.send(getRSSParam);
}
Basically, I want to iterate through the list ArrayCollection, and update list.getItemAt(i).title with result passed from the HTTPService.
This doesn't work! Help!
First make a result event on httpservice in that only you will access the result for the request.
In that method you will get resultEvent from that take out the required value if it return the response as xml you can directly do like this lastResult.article.title
<mx:HTTPService id="yahooHTTPService"
url="http://search.yahooapis.com/WebSearchService/V1/webSearch"
method="GET"
makeObjectsBindable="true" result="httpServiceResult(event)"
fault="httpServiceFault(event)" showBusyCursor="true">
</mx:HTTPService>
here is an example http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=data_access_2.html#193905
Related
I have an array of integers called data which I would like to send from my View to a specific controller, I could see that i can send integers and strings and it works with the code that I have so far, but when I try to send an array I can get the data correctly.
This is the code that I have in my view, it is something simple just to be in perspective.
function SeeStation() {
var data = [];
var i = 0;
$("input:checkbox:checked").each(function () {
data[i] = $(this).val();
});
window.location.href = "#Url.Action("ExportData", "Dispatch")?id=" + data;
}
and this is the code in the controller. I know it doesn't make much sense but so far I am focused on correctly obtaining the array by parameter.
public ActionResult ExportData(int[] id)
{
var data = cn.ESTACIONDESPACHOes.ToList();
return View(data);
}
In my array data I store something like this [1,2,3] and I would like to get something similar in the controller array id.
It will not bind like that.
To get the id array in your action you need to have the link at the end like this: *Dispatch/ExportData?id=1&id=2&id=3*
Your "#Url.Action("ExportData", "Dispatch")?id=" + data; will not generate that (data will give the numbers separated with commas).
You can just build the query string when you enumerate the checkboxes.
function SeeStation() {
var data = '';
$("input:checkbox:checked").each(function () {
data += 'id='$(this).val() + '&';
});
window.location.href = "#Url.Action("ExportData", "Dispatch")?" + data;
}
You will have a "&" in the end. You can easily remove it, but it will not affect anything.
There may be better ways to do this though, but I just used your function.
try
#Url.Action("ExportData", "Dispatch", new { id= [1,2,3] })
Store the Values in the Hidden Fields
#Html.HiddenFor(m => m.Ids, new { #Value = [1,2,3] })
Then Using the Ajax Get Method Pass the Hidden fields
In the Controller Method Convert the sting to array using string extension method
function SeeStation() {
var data = [];
var i = 0;
$("input:checkbox:checked").each(function () {
data[i] = $(this).val();
});
location.href = '#Url.Action("ExportData", "Dispatch")?id=' + data;
}
Please remove window keyword.
I have a remote object returned and I am trying to populate it into combobox.
<s:RemoteObject id="ro" result="result(event)" destination="echoServiceDestination">
private var statesData:ArrayCollection;
private function result(e:ResultEvent):void{
statesData = e.result as ArrayCollection;
}
How can I turn this collection into something like {label:"Red", data:"#FF0000"} so that I can populate into combobox
The remote object is party and I can't seem to able to cast it as below
var party:Party = new Party;
for(var i:int = 0 ; i < statesData.length; i++)
{
party = statesData.getItemAt(i);
}
Thanks for the help.
You need to implement a label function. Set the returning data directly as dataprovider to your combobox:
<mx:ComboBox id="comboBox"
dataProvider="{statesData}"
labelFunction="labelFunc" />
This will be your label function:
private function labelFunc(item:Object):String {
return item.label; // Or whatever parameter you want to display
}
]]>
</mx:Script>
I think I've established that in as3corelib JSON.decode I have no choice but to deserialise to a plain old flex object.
var data:Object = JSON.decode(json);
If I then want to get the data contained in the object into another type I can't use type casting. I have to instantiate a new instance and add the properties manually.
var data:Object = JSON.decode(json);
var model:Model = new Model();
model.name = data.name;
model.notes = data.notes;
A pain and a bit ugly, but I'm guessing this is the price to be paid for going from untyped json to a flex type. My first question is whether my assumption is correct and there is no prettier way to create my model instance with the data contained within the json?
My second question, if so then before I write my own method to do this, is there anything inside the flex api that will take the data object and mixin it's values to my model instance?
Cheers,
Chris
the approach I've always used proved to be part of the AMF3 serialization mechanism in ActionScript.
have a look at IExternalizable and registerClassAlias.
now what I use is the following:
interface ISerializable {
public function getRawData():Object;
public function setRawData(param:Object):void;
}
function registerType(id:String, type:Class):void {
//implementation
}
function getTypeByID(id:String):Class {
//implementation
}
function getTypeID(type:Class):String {
//implementation
}
and to the decoder/encoder you register a class alias.
serialization of an object works as follows:
var raw:Object = model.getRawData();
raw[" type"] = getTypeID(model);
var encoded:String = JSON.encode(raw);
decoding works as follows:
var raw:Object = JSON.decode(raw);
var cl:Class = getTypeByID(raw[" type"]);
if (cl == null) throw new Error("no class registered for type: "+raw[" type"]);
delete raw[" type"];
var model:ISerializable = new cl();
model.setRawData(raw);
you will need to do this recursively on the whole deserialized JSON tree, starting at the leafs.
For cyclic reference, you'll need a trick.
I had an implementation of this somewhere, but I can't find it.
You can loop within the field of you json decoded object and assign them into your model:
function json2model(json:String):Model{
var data:Object = JSON.decode(json);
var m:Model=new Model();
for (var field:String in data) {
if (m.hasOwnProperty(field)) {
m[field] = data[field];
}
}
return m;
}
var model:Model=json2model(json)
or add a static function within your Model if you preffer:
public class Model {
//...
public static function fromJSon(json:String):Model {
var data:Object = JSON.decode(json);
var m:Model=new Model();
for (var field:String in data) {
if (m.hasOwnProperty(field)) {
m[field] = data[field];
}
}
return m;
}
}
}
var model:Model=Model.fromJSon(json);
Im trying to extend the flex ArrayCollection to be able to search for an object containing specific data and give it back.
Here is my function:
public function getItemContaining(value: String): Object {
//Loop through the collection
for each(var i: Object in this) {
//Loop through fields
for(var j: String in i) {
//If field value is equal to input value
if(i[j] == value) {
return i;
}
}
}
//If not found
return null;
}
Problem is j is always null so the second loop never works. So I read flex loop descriptions and actually it should work just fine. What can possibly be the problem?
Try it like this:
for (var name:String in myObject){
trace(name + ":" + myObject[name];
}
Okay that was actually the same you were doing. The error must be in this line:
for each(var i: Object in this) {
Try using this:
for each(var i: Object in this.source) {
My first instinct would be to have a look at data type. You're setting up a loop declaring j:String and the symptom is that j is always null. This suggests to me that Flex is failing to interpret the elements of i as strings. If Flex only recognizes the elements of i as Objects (because all Strings are Objects, and Objects are the lowest common denominator), it would return null for j:String.
Try this for your inner loop:
for(var j: Object in i) {
//If field value is equal to input value
if(i[j] is String && (i[j] as String) == value) {
return i;
}
}
if you are using ArrayCollection as your datasource, you should look at using the IViewCursor interface. You can supply a custom compare function, or supply the fields top compare to. This interface is well documented with examples in adobe/livedocs
var _cursor:IViewCursor;
var _idSortField:SortField;
var _idSort:Sort = new Sort();
_idSortField = new SortField();
_idSortField.compareFunction = this.myCompareFunction;
_idSort.fields = [_idSortField];
myArrayCollection.sort = _idSort;
myArrayCollection.refresh();
_cursor = myArrayCollection.createCursor();
if (_cursor.findAny(search))
return _cursor;
if you are search for a value in a specific property, then its even easier. Here's the link to adobe livedocs on this topic
This question doesn't relate only to MouseEvent.CLICK event type but to all event types that already exist in AS3. I read a lot about custom events but until now I couldn't figure it out how to do what I want to do. I'm going to try to explain, I hope you understand:
Here is a illustration of my situation:
for(var i:Number; i < 10; i++){
var someVar = i;
myClips[i].addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, doSomething);
}
function doSomething(e:MouseEvent){ /* */ }
But I want to be able to pass someVar as a parameter to doSomething. So I tried this:
for(var i:Number; i < 10; i++){
var someVar = i;
myClips[i].addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, function(){
doSomething(someVar);
});
}
function doSomething(index){ trace(index); }
This kind of works but not as I expect. Due to the function closures, when the MouseEvent.CLICK events are actually fired the for loop is already over and someVar is holding the last value, the number 9 in the example. So every click in each movie clip will call doSomething passing 9 as the parameter. And it's not what I want.
I thought that creating a custom event should work, but then I couldn't find a way to fire a custom event when the MouseEvent.CLICK event is fired and pass the parameter to it. Now I don't know if it is the right answer.
What should I do and how?
You really need to extend the event class to create your own event with extra parameters. Placing functions inside the addEventListener (anonymous functions) is a recipe for memory leaks, which is not good.
Take a look at the following.
import flash.events.Event;
//custom event class to enable the passing of strings along with the actual event
public class TestEvent extends Event
{
public static const TYPE1 :String = "type1";
public static const TYPE2 :String = "type2";
public static const TYPE3 :String = "type3";
public var parameterText:String;
public function TestEvent (type:String, searchText:String)
{
this.parameterText = searchText;
super(type);
}
}
when you create a new event such as
dispatchEvent(new TestEvent(TestEvent.TYPE1, 'thisIsTheParameterText'))" ;
you can then listen for that event like this
someComponent.addEventListener(TestEvent.TYPE1, listenerFunction, true , 0, true);
and inside the function 'listenerFunction' event.parameterText will contain your parameter.
so inside your myClips component you would fire off the custom event and listen for that event and not the Click event.
Without knowing more about your application, it seems more like you should use the target to pass parameters, or extend MouseEvent. The former would be more in line with common practice, though. So for example, if you exposed an integer public property on your "clip" object (whatever it is):
public class MyClip
{
public var myPublicProperty:int;
public function MyClip() { //... }
}
for (var i:int = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
myClips[i].myPublicProperty = i;
myClips[i].addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, doSomething);
}
... and then, in your event listener, you could retrieve that property using either the target or currentTarget property of the event (probably currentTarget, in your case):
function doSomething(event:MouseEvent):void
{
trace(event.currentTarget.myPublicProperty.toString());
}
That ought to do it! Good luck.
private function myCallbackFunction(e:Event, parameter:String):void
{
//voila, here's your parameter
}
private function addArguments(method:Function, additionalArguments:Array):Function
{
return function(event:Event):void {method.apply(null, [event].concat(additionalArguments));}
}
var parameter:String = "A sentence I want to pass along";
movieClip.addEventListener(Event.COMPLETE, addArguments(myCallbackFunction, [parameter] ) );
Take advantage of the dynamic function construction in AS3.
You can accomplish this by getting your handler out of a function that gives the variable closure, like this:
for (var i=0; i<5; i++) {
myClips[i].addEventListener( MouseEvent.CLICK, getHandler(i) );
}
function getHandler(i) {
return function( e:MouseEvent ) {
test(i);
}
}
function test( j ) {
trace("foo "+j);
}
Also, as for why this creates a new closure, you might want to check the explanation in the accepted answer to this similar question.
Thanks so much for this usefull tips, this technique is better to understand than classes explanation.
for me I just started new code algorithm using this technique to solve link relation between timers array and viewports array, and update status by change text inside them frequently, by passing ID's with timers events.
like this:
var view:Object=[];
for(var i:uint=0;i<Camera.names.length;i++){
view[i]=getChildByName("Cam"+i);
//_________ Add Text _________
var tf:TextField = new TextField();
tf.autoSize = TextFieldAutoSize.LEFT;
tf.textColor=0xffffff;
view[i].tf=view[i].addChild(tf);
//_________ Add Timer _________
var t:Timer = new Timer(1000);
view[i].timer=t;
view[i].timer.start();
view[i].timer.addEventListener(TimerEvent.TIMER, addArg(i));
}
function addArg(adi:uint):Function {
return function(event:TimerEvent):void {
updatecamstatus(adi);
}
}
function updatecamstatus(vH:uint):void {
with (view[vH]){
tf.text="Cam" + vH + "\n";
tf.appendText("activityLevel: " + videosource.activityLevel + "\n");
tf.appendText("motionLevel: " + videosource.motionLevel + "\n");
}
}
I see your main goal isn't actually to create a custom MouseEvent.CLICK, but to pass a parameter to the function. You don't need to complicatedly create or extend anything. There's a simple and closure-trouble-free way to do it.
Just make your function like this:
function doSomething(index:Number):Function {
return function(e:MouseEvent):void {
// Use "e" and "index" here. They'll be unique for each addEventListener()
trace(index);
}
}
This technique can relate to any AS3 event type you can use addEventListener on.
And now you can add it like this:
var functionsDoSomething:Object;
for (var i:Number = 0; i < 10; i++) {
var someVar:Number = i;
functionsDoSomething[i] = doSomething(someVar);
myClips[i].addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, functionsDoSomething[i]);
}
The doSomething(someVar) can be used directly on addEventListener(), but it's better to keep it in a variable because you'll be able to remove it later the same fashion you added it:
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
myClips[i].removeEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, functionsDoSomething[i]);
}
The commonly used e.currentTarget.someCustomProperty works for dynamic objects (i.e. MovieClip), but will let you down at anything else (i.e. Sprite), forcing you to build a whole custom extended object/event for every type.
This solution deals with every "listenable" object and event. And this answer has more details and examples on it.