I am using a aix box over a network.
I am using putty to work on the box. The problem is its too slow,But we do have a high speed network.
Is there any terminal program other than putty that can help me work comfortably..by doing some buffering or other mechanism by which i wont feel like i m working on a dialup.
Thanks.
PuTTY is perfectly fast - I've never had any problems with it.
Have you established where the bottleneck is? What's the exact setup of the network between your client and the server? Is perhaps the AIX server too heavily loaded?
I have the same problem depending on where I am. Lately, at home, I'm stuck with my horribly slow back up connection while my primary ISP goes through 'growing pains'
Its been a while since I have used putty, does it have an option for gzip compression? If not, I recommend using the official OpenSSH client (but it can be painful to install on Windows).
I typically use ssh -C (compression) user#host, the speed up is almost 30%. I feel your pain, it sucks when typing and every character takes ~3 seconds to appear.
Related
I am working for a company that is providing File-Share-Software for all sorts of Protocols such as FTP, SFTP, FTPS and so on. One of our customers is facing an issue with Key-Auth and spontaneously login-problems.
Going trough the code I am pretty certain that the server collapses with too many requests at the same time. What I need right now is a simple tool to test a situation just like this. I need a simple SFTP-Fuzzer or Stresser, sending invalid or broken Auth-Attempts to the SFTP-Server.
I am not a developer but a technician and instead of writing something myself (which would take forever) I would love to have a simple script or toolset to go...if there is one.
Ok, found one faster than I thought.
Steps:
Download Kali Linux (or any Distro that contains Metasploit)
Fire up Kali Linux and put it in the same subnet as your SFTP-Server
Start Metasploit and use the SSH-Fuzzer /auxiliary/fuzzer/ssh/ssh_version_2
Set RHOST and RPORT to the relevant IP and port your server is listening to
Exploit and see what will happen
Is there any way to run an NBD (Network Block Device) client and server on the same machine without deadlocking the system?
I am very exhausted looking to find an answer for this. I appreciate if anyone can help.
UPDATE:
I'm writing an NBD server that talks to Google Storage system. I want to mount a file system on the NBD and backup my files. I will be hugely disappointed if I have to end up running the server on another machine. Few ideas I already had seem to lead nowhere:
telling the file system to open the block device using O_DIRECT flag to bypass the linux buffer cache
using a raw device (unfortunately, raw devices are character devices and FSes refuse to use them as underlying device)
Just for the record, having the NBD client and server on the same machine has been possible since 2008.
Use a virtual machine (not a container) - you need two kernels, but you don't need two physical machines.
Since the front page of the Sourceforge project for NBD say that a deadlock will happen "within seconds" in this scenario, I'm guessing the answer is a big "No."
Try to write a more complete question of what actual goal you're trying to accomplish. There's some times that you need to bang away at a little problem, and some times that you need to look at the big picture.
Hi Guys I'm debugging some CS program and to view the performance of the application in slow internet I tried many different ways. However the best would be the Server and the client be in the same PC ---- my debugging environments for both the server side and the client is setup in one PC.
So I'm wondering is there anyway to limit the speed? I'm using TCP but I don't know too much in-depth knowledge of it.
Thank you
There are two important factors regarding a "slow" internet connection that you need to test out since they have different implications for your application: bandwidth and latency.
If you provide some more details about what os you are running your tests on, it would be easier to recommend a way to limit the network performance.
On a related side note, it's generally a bad idea to performance test any kind of networking using the loopback device on your machine, since many aspects of this will perform very different than the regular network device on your machine.
You mention in the comments this needs to be done on windows, while the Network Emulators I know of (e.g. netem, TCN, other variants) all require Linux. So one thing you could do is create a virtual machine (VirtualBox is fine, I did similar things with it), install linux on it, configure 2 network interfaces, emulate the slow/long/lossy/jittery network between them, and route the test traffic through it from windows.
Finally I found this does what I need.
http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/socket_sniffer.html
Captures Windows Socket traffic, no matter it's local or not.
I have a ASP.NET AJAX intranet application that has been running for a few months. It runs reasonably fast on the LAN.
However when going over a VPN it slows down dramatically. Even taking line speed into account its takes like 60 seconds to change a page. I eventually got a vmware up and running to test the VPN speed, so the connection is super fast, but it still takes the same amount of time. I can even remote desktop over the VPN to the VMware and its perfect.
This makes me think that its has nothing to do with line speed. FYI I am using Hamachi.
I have tried other VPN software and it gives the same results.
I am really stuck... any help would be much appreciated!
I found the problem was due to trying to do a dns lookup in the code. Changed to just the IP and now working!!!
Try to add system counters for "Byte per second" and other similar parameters of you network. This helps you to figure out the bottleneck of you system.
I have a website running a basic ASP.NET application that is mostly used from a single location, which is my client's office. The server is at a high-class datacenter.
Whenever I've been testing or using my application from outside their office I have consistently good connections but from their office the connection seems inconsistent. Sometimes requests just don't seem to make it to the server from the browser. I'm not familiar with the network hardware in the office, but they do have a T1 connection which should always be on.
I've tried ping and tracert and everything looks normal. When running Firebug during a failed request the request shows up in the log, then just sits there without showing it is sending any data, eventually it times out.
My question is, what tools can I use to diagnose this connection problem and start to narrow it down to a specific cause so I can fix it? Its an intermittent problem so a long running tool would probably make more sense, if there is any available.
Thanks for any help.
All of your standard ping and traceroute tools are probably your best bet. I'm not understanding though, where is the site located?
If you open command prompt, run ping -t aspwebsiteurl.domain <- will show if there is packet loss.
From command prompt again, tracert aspwebsiteurl.domain <- will show you what route the packet is taking to get the site. May also show you if there is one particular hop that is giving you the hickup.
Is there a proxy between the office and the datacenter that could be causing issues?
Also you could try Wireshark to try to debug the problem in more detail.
Speed Test - Internet Network Connection Speed may be of some help with some links to test out the connection at the client's office to see how well it works.
Another question is how far away is the client and the datacenter? If one is in New York and the other in Los Angeles then the distance apart may be a factor. Also, have you examined any possible DNS issues?