The "disown" command works in bash, but not in ksh.
If I have started a process in ksh, how can I "disown" it, so I can exit my shell.
(I know about nohup, but the process has already started!)
ksh93 supports the disown command. Also, some versions of nohup allow you to specify a process id with the -p option, instead of a command.
In ksh just run disown without -h option. That's it.
From the ksh(1) manual:
disown [ job... ]
Causes the shell not to send a HUP signal to each given job, or all active
jobs if job is omitted, when a login shell terminates.
Related
I am using alacritty and tmux together. Is it possible to make tmux run everytime when I launch alacritty?
Yes. In the shell option, you can set the program you want to run and even pass in the arguments. For example, in your alacritty.yml file, you can set this:
shell:
program: /usr/local/bin/tmux # <- set this to the path of your tmux installation
args:
- new-session
- -A
- -D
- -s
- main
Every time you start alacritty, tmux will start a new session and pass the other args.
Or go the easy route and launch your terminal this way:
alacritty -e tmux
i'm using this script:
https://cedaei.com/posts/ideas-from-my-dev-setup-always-tmux/
had it from https://lobste.rs/s/n5blid/ideas_from_my_development_setup_always
and use it in alacritty as:
shell:
program: /home/user/.local/bin/tmux_chooser.sh
What does the set -e command do in SHELL scripting?
Like the following command:
set -e
Can we do any other things with set -e operation?
The 'set' command is used set and examine shell options, as well as set positional parameters.
The -e flag does the following:
-e Exit immediately if a command exits with a non-zero status.
Hope this helps :)
Using the flag -e you ensure stops the execution if a command during the execution has an error.
The default behaviour is to ignore the errors in script executions.
If you want to manage this errors, you can use the command "trap".
I am hoping someone can help me figure out what setting I might need to overwrite. I am working on a Unix terminal server, running a Linux Xterm linux shell. Everytime I use a command like grep "blah" 2> /dev/null at the shell prompt, the command is run as grep "blah" 2 > /dev/null and needless to say the redirection fails.
xterm version is X.Org 6.8.99.903(238)
I can not update or install anything, this is a locked down production server.
Thanks for any help and illumination on the topic, it is making my grep useless at high directory levels with recursion.
That's Bourne shell syntax, and it doesn't work in c-shell.
The best you can do is
( command >stdout_file ) >&stderr_file
Where you get stdout to one file, and stderr to another. Redirecting just stderr is not possible.
In a comment, you say "A minor note, this is csh". That's not a minor note, that's the cause of the problem. xterm is just a terminal emulator, not a shell; all it does is set up a window that provides textual input and output. csh (or bash, or ...) is the shell, the program that interprets the commands you type.
csh has different syntax for redirection, and doesn't let you redirect just stderr. command > file redirects stdout; command >& file redirects both stdout and stderr.
You say the system doesn't have bash, but it does have ksh. I suggest just using ksh; it will be a lot more familiar to you. Both bash and ksh are derived from the old Bourne shell.
All (?) Unix-like systems will have a Bourne-like shell installed as /bin/sh. Even if you're using csh (or tcsh?) as your interactive shell, you can still invoke sh, even in a one-liner. For example:
sh -c 'command 2>/dev/null'
will invoke sh, which in turn will invoke command and redirect just its stderr to /dev/null.
The purpose of an interactive shell is (mostly) to let you use other commands that are available on the system. sh, or any shell, can be used as just another command.
i'm running a script from ASP.NET/C# using SharpSsh. I realize when the script runs and i do a ps -ef grep from unix, i see the same script running twice, one in csh -c, and the other with ksh. The script has shebang ksh, so i'm not sure why a copy of csh is also running. Also if i run the same script directly from unix, only one copy runs with ksh. There's no other shell running from within the script.
Most Unix/Linux now have a command or option that will show process trees, with indented list like, look for -t or -T options to ps OR ptree OR ???
USER PID PPID START TT TIME CMD
daemon 1 1 11-03-06 ? 0 init
myusr 221568 1 11-03-07 tty10 1.00s \_ -ksh
myusr 350976 221568 07:52:11 tty10 0 | \_ ps -efT
I bet you'll see that the csh is the user login shell that includes your script as an argument ( you may have to use different options to ps to see the full command-line of the csh process) AND as a sub process you'll see ksh executing your script, and further sub-processes under ksh for any external commands that the script is calling.
I hope this helps.
P.S. as you appear to be a new user, if you get an answer that helps you please remember to mark it as accepted, or give it a + (or -) as a useful answer.
I have a script that looks like this
#!/bin/bash
function something() {
echo "hello world!!"
}
something | tee logfile
I have set the execute permission on this file and when I try running the file like this
$./script.sh
it runs perfectly fine, but when I run it on the command line like this
$sh script.sh
It throws up an error. Why does this happen and what are the ways in which I can fix this.
Running it as ./script.sh will make the kernel read the first line (the shebang), and then invoke bash to interpret the script. Running it as sh script.sh uses whatever shell your system defaults sh to (on Ubuntu this is Dash, which is sh-compatible, but doesn't support some of the extra features of Bash).
You can fix it by invoking it as bash script.sh, or if it's your machine you can change /bin/sh to be bash and not whatever it is currently (usually just by symlinking it - rm /bin/sh && ln -s /bin/bash /bin/sh). Or you can just use ./script.sh instead if that's already working ;)
If your shell is indeed dash and you want to modify the script to be compatible, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh has a helpful guide to the differences. In your sample it looks like you'd just have to remove the function keyword.
if your script is at your present working directory and you issue ./script.sh, the kernel will read the shebang (first line) and execute the shell interpreter that is defined. you can also call your script.sh by specifying the path of the interpreter eg
/bin/bash myscript.sh
/bin/sh myscript.sh
/bin/ksh myscript.sh etc
By the way, you can also put your shebang like this (if you don't want to specify full path)
#!/usr/bin/env sh
sh script.sh forces the script to be executed within the sh - shell.
while simply starting it from command line uses the shell-environemnt you're in.
Please post the error message for further answers.
Random though on what the error may be:
path specified in first line /bin/bash is wrong -- maybe bash is not installed?