In earlier days I used a certain comment style for PHP and my IDE would understand that this was quick documentation for the package/method. Now, I use PLSQL and I see that my DataGrip generates such documentation automatically for tables. I wonder if I can make it so that DataGrip displays some comments as quick documentation as well.
/** Comment within such a double asterisk would display when I hover over my old PHP code */
function some_method( some_var in INT) return Int;
Related
I'm trying to write a custom injection for Neovim's Treesitter that will highlight tagged template literals as SQL code.
The code in question looks like this:
import sql from "postgres"
const query = sql` SELECT * FROM my_table`
I'd like to tell Treesitter to parse this tagged template literal as SQL code. This is possible using Treesitter's custom injections; in fact the library uses this same technique to inject syntax for GraphQL tagged template literals, which I believe happens in this file here.
I've written a configuration file at ~/.config/nvim/after/queries/ecma/injections.scm that's quite similar to the GraphQL query, and although Treesitter is recognizing the file, the injection isn't working at all. Does anyone have a solution to this? Ideally, Treesitter would see the sql tagged template literal and interpret the body of the function with the SQL parser.
to make tree sitter use injections in your after/ folder, your injections.scm file should contain ; extends as first line.
Took me many hours to figure it out, it's now documented right here
Similar to what #brotify-force said, but my own SQL injection for Python was not working until I realized what the issue was.
~/.config/nvim/after/queries/python/injections.scm
; extends
(assignment
left: (identifier) #_id (#match? #_id "sql")
right: (string) #sql
)
My original query used #id, but it seems like if you have any captures not starting with an underscore besides the language capture, the Neovim Treesitter machinery gets confused.
I've been trying to do something similar but for template strings that just happen to contain SQL. I was inspired by a VSCode plugin that syntax highlights any template string that has a comment like /*sql*/ in front of it. Here's what I came up with.
; extends
(
(comment) #_comment-text
(#match? #_comment-text "sql")
(template_string) #ql
)
I do wish there was a proper sql module for tree-sitter, and it looks like one is in the works, but the ql module will do for now.
I'm writing a WordPress plugin in which there is an input form for users with which they can add notes. I'm using WooCommerce update_meta_data method to save notes in database.
Considering this code:
$note = isset($_POST['order_note']) ? sanitize_text_field($_POST['order_note']) : '';
$order->update_meta_data('_order_note', wp_json_encode($note));
$order->save_meta_data();
I know that update_post_meta sanitizes data (SQL Injection) before inserting it into database but how about update_meta_data ?
Is above code safe to use for inserting data in database?
update_meta_data
As far as I can see on the woo's update_meta_dataSource Code, there is not any sanitizing function getting called.
update_metadata
On the other hand, if you take a look at the wordpress update_metadataDocs, there are two sanitizing functions getting called:
sanitize_keySource Code
and
sanitize_metaSource Code
So to answer your question, yes I would use a sanitizing function too before I update the meta data using update_meta_data.
In order to do that, sanitize_text_field would usually get the job done fine, but if you want to be sure that you're using the right sanitizing function, then use sanitize_metaDocs instead. That's what wordpress itself is using. Security-wise, I, personally, never had any problems using sanitize_text_field nor did I see anybody else having any problems with it. The snippet you provided us with, looks safe to me.
I have a field in my acore_characters table named 'rank' with a tinyint which ranges from 0 to 3 inclusive, based on player's progression. I need to read that value at both login and at certain specific circumstances.
I wrote the following PreparedStatement: "SELECT rank FROM acore_characters WHERE guid = ?" and then the code which is supposed to read that value:
uint16 GetCharactersRank(uint64 guid) {
PreparedStatement* stmt = CharacterDatabase.GetPreparedStatement(mystatement);
stmt->setUInt32(0, GetGUID());
PreparedQueryResult result = CharacterDatabase.Query(stmt);
if (result) {
[...truncated]
and then fetching the result and so on, but then I get a code C8361 when compiling because 'GetGUID':identifier not found in Player.cpp file...what goes wrong? The other GetGUID calls throughout the file dont give this result. I'm not very fond of c++, any help is very appreciated.
It's not recommended to directly patch the core to add customisations to it. Instead, use modules.
An example can be found here: Is it possible to turn a core patch into a module for AzerothCore?
You can have a look and copy the skeleton-module and start modifying it to create your own.
In your case, you probably want to use the OnLogin player hook.
I am working on Oracle 11g NACHA eText rtf template and i am facing problems while creating this template as per Bank needs. I need help while using substring extended function in column Originating DFI Identification.
My function is like this: substr(BankAccountNumber,1,8)
But when, I test the template using template viewer i got following erorr:
[112616_130010213][][PROCEDURE] Log Level is changed to PROCEDURE
[112616_130011163][][ERROR] expression: is invalid
Time: 4.706 sec.
FO Formatting failed.
End of Process.
Anyone here can help me with this please ?
The syntax looks correct, try making it uppercase. Check to see if that tag contains any data, and that the datatype is Alpha in the etext template.
While trying to understand why my view is not displaying, I noticed the following error in the log:
I do not think it is possible to delete the URL alias from Taxonomy terms. At least I cannot find how to do this.
I have, however gone through ALL of my taxonomy terms and removed the value for this field.
I have also done the following with Pathauto:
Also, I have checked the report located at admin/reports/fields and can confirm that there are no entities that use a field called URL alias.
I have gone through each content item and ensured that they have the following setting (anyone know how to do this in bulk?). But still the error remains.
Anyone know then how I can fix this strange error?
Im not entirely sure what this command does, but it fixed the error:
drush updb --entity-updates
Since https://www.drupal.org/node/2554097, the magic in Drupal core that took care of updating entity definitions is gone. drush updb --entiy-updates is an alternative to this but it is not a silver bullet. Instead, it is safer to write database updates.
Taking the screenshot at the top as an example, here is a database update that would delete those two field definitions:
/**
* Fix taxonomy and node field definitions.
*
*/
function mymodule_update_8101() {
$manager = \Drupal::entityDefinitionUpdateManager();
if ($field = $manager->getFieldStorageDefinition('alias', 'node')) {
$manager->uninstallFieldStorageDefinition($field);
}
if ($field = $manager->getFieldStorageDefinition('alias', 'term')) {
$manager->uninstallFieldStorageDefinition($field);
}
}
Have a look at the rest of the available methods at https://www.drupal.org/node/2554097 in order to write database updates for each scenario.
use the entity_update module or the devel_entity_updates module