I have to capture screenshot all things in scroll view, I use keyword Selenium2Library.Capture Page Screenshot and then zoom out but it got only visible screen.
Search Transaction Data By Input Date
Input Text &{Transaction}[startDate] ${STARTDATE}
Input Text &{Transaction}[endDate] ${ENDDATE}
Click Element &{Transaction}[searchBtn]
Wait Until Element Is Visible &{Transaction}[firstTransDate] timeout=10s
Firefox Browser Zoom Out 3
capture page screenshot
Appreciate everyone can suggest if there are other ways to capture all things in scroll view.
I've been working over the past several months to make a site accessible and a JAWS issue has recently brought to my attention by our QA department.
I've put up a CodePen showing an example similar to what I've built. The main piece here is the Track List:
<div id="track-list"
tabindex="0"
role="menu"
aria-expanded="true"
aria-activedescendant="ch1">
https://codepen.io/Motorcykey/pen/qyJrWX
Background:
The idea is that we have a Chapter list of menu-items which can be hidden or shown by clicking a Button. When the list is showing, you will tab from the Chapters button into the list. Once in the list, Tab & Shift+Tab will only scroll through the menu items. Only the 'Esc' key will exit the list.
The Issue:
Without JAWS running this works fine. If a user attempts to hit the 'Up/Down' keys, nothing out of the ordinary occurs.
However, once JAWS is open it was found that if the Up/Down keys were used then a colored highlight box would appear that would read other parts of the page without necessarily focusing them. Originally, this would include the hidden menu-items, but I was able to get rid of this by setting their display to 'none' (as opposed to just setting their opacity to '0').
However, you can still see in this example that if you take the following steps:
Tab to Chapters Button
Hit Space or Enter to hide the menu
Hit the 'Down' Key on the keyboard. The next, "Play/Pause button" should highlight and be read aloud by JAWS screen reader.
Meanwhile, the 'Chapters' button remains 'focused' with the default browser highlight.
My question is around this highlight box and the expected function of Up/Down keys within JAWS. What is the purpose of this highlight box as it seems decoupled from the browser focus. Is there a way to disable it? Do users typically use Up/Down keys, and if so, does this look like the expected behavior or should I be taking more into consideration to avoid confusion around these keys while working on accessibility updates?
Thank you,
-Mikey
an element with role="menu" must be controlled by arrow keys e.g. down arrow key moves focus to the next menu item and up arrow moves to the previous menu item and tab/shift+tab must moves focus to the next/previous page element. the correct implementation example: https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-practices-1.1/#menubutton
I am creating a menu screen for my game and instead of creating button there I just have text font. I want to know whether it is possible to to make them touchable.as i have 3 text in main menu so three different function.
I have very little experience making GUIs in LibGDX, and I'm sure this answer is too late anyway, but:
Why not just have a clickable object surrounding the text, and just don't render this?
In other words, do what you'd do normally for a button, just don't render it.
I made some research before writing here, but I couldn't find nothing that satisfied my answer to this specific case.
I have an icon, and when user hover onto it I want the icon become smaller and text (caption for the icon) should appear -at icons bottom.
As now, I have an interaction for the icon, that makes it become smaller.
It's first time for me working with WebFlow, and I see that using overlapping blocks they work as layers in the sense that the one on top is the only one who react to hovering.
I found in other questions that there was the need of setting correctly absolute/relative for blocks, but is not working for me since I have also the icon, inside the same block.
If I move the icon out of the block, I have the problem I shared before about overlapping "layers".
I need that icon decrease in size and text appear at the same time.
Is this achievable?
Thank you for your help!
[Please only post an answer if you know the answer really well -- if you post an answer such as "I think it is easy to style it in CSS", then it is a guess and not a real answer, and it will make lots of people skip this question because it is marked as "answered"]
[I know the Share button is to be phased out, replaced by the Like button, but the program management still wants to use it as well as using the Like button]
I see fairly often that the Facebook Share button is faked by using an icon, as a background, and the text "Share" as a "button" -- the icon + text is faked to be 1 button.
Example:
http://www.youtube.com/create_detail/GoAnimate
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2381106,00.asp
The surprising thing is, it actually looks good on FF as well as IE 7. And the top link uses Tahoma font, while the second one uses Verdana for Windows, and "Lucida Grande" for Mac.
Question 1: what is it not made into an image? Because as we all know, an image looks the same almost every where. If you need to align the icon with the text, for all different fonts on different platform - Mac, Win 7, Win XP, Vista, Linux, IE 7, IE 8, FF, Chrome, and make the background of the text blue so that it looks like part of a button, it is going to be hard. Different fonts have different top space and bottom space (the "leading" as in printing terms), so it is hard to align the text well with the icon, and also hard to make the font not to look like grainy text on all platforms.
Question 2: is there a standard library or standard method to do it?
(the long existing <fb-share> as XFBML actually gives you an <a>, with the background icon, and then a <span> inside the <a> tag containing the text "Share". So it is actually just a square icon + text, but such as the second link above, they will fake it as a button. Maybe that's why even when it is not XFBML, some people still show the button this way instead of a good old image)
Update: also, it is hard because they usually are just <span>, and you can't specify a width for a <span>. Also, it has double borders to make it look like 3D, but it looks like 1 border is real CSS border and 1 border is by using the Sprite underneath.
Update 2: By the way, of all the Facebook Share button page that still exist on web, I never saw one with a Bubble with a count... this is getting more mysterious...
There are three good reasons for doing it this way:
Reuse: You can use the same icon on several different buttons, regardless of what the text content of the button is. This means you only have to download the icon once, which saves on bandwidth (see below) and means you don't have to make a different button image for every button you want to provide to the user. This is especially important on multilingual sites, as I'm sure you can imagine.
Bandwidth saving: The small icon used to decorate the text button is a lot smaller than an entire button graphic would be and therefore consumes less bandwidth to download it. While for one button this might not amount to much, it all adds up, especially on a site with potentially hundreds of different buttons that gets the kind of traffic that a site like Youtube or Facebook might get.
Accessibility: Image buttons take some additional work to make them accessible (the addition of an alt tag for example) which can get overlooked by web developers in a hurry. Text buttons are accessible by default because they're, well, text.
As for how to do it well, there's any number of approaches. You could use the <button> tag, though this has its own set of issues in IE, you could use <input type="button" /> and give it a background and padding (so the text doesn't overwrite the background) but that approach will require javascript to make the button actually do anything, <input type="submit" /> (similar to buttons but handling them is done server side instead of with javascript), or you could style <a> tags to look like buttons by giving them a background, white top and left border, black bottom and right border, etc. I'm sure there's others as well that I can't remember off the top of my head.
UPDATE: The OP added an update regarding spans and width. By default, no, you can't give a span a width. If you give it padding you can create space inside for adding the icon as a background image, of course, but if you need to explicitly give a span a width you can do it by setting its cisplay CSS property to block or inline-block (the latter requires a modern browser to work)