I need to find how is the SourceBaseAmountCur being computed, in my case I am getting an error in Amount Origin on the SST window where it doesn't show 0 when it needs to be.
I am coming from General Ledger > Journals > General Journal > (select a record, going to Lines) > then SST window. Then, the Amount Origin field.
The Amount Origin is a display field:
display TaxBaseCur displaySourceBaseAmountCur(TmpTaxWorkTrans _tmpTaxWorkTrans)
{
return taxTmpWorkTransForm.getSourceBaseAmountCur(_tmpTaxWorkTrans);
}
As seen on the code above, it already passes a TmpTaxWorkTrans record. Going to that method on the class TaxTmpWorkTransForm this is the method:
public TaxAmountCur getSourceBaseAmountCur(TmpTaxWorkTrans _tmpTaxWorkTrans = null, TmpTaxRegulation _tmpTaxRegulation = null)
{
if (_tmpTaxRegulation)
{
return _tmpTaxRegulation.SourceBaseAmountCur;
}
else
{
return _tmpTaxWorkTrans.SourceBaseAmountCur * _tmpTaxWorkTrans.taxChangeDisplaySign(accountTypeMap);
}
}
I found this article: https://dynamicsuser.net/ax/f/technical/92855/how-tmptaxworktrans-populated
and I started from there Class\Tax\insertIntersection and unfortunately I couldn't find what I was looking for, been debugging for days.
An important distinction is tax calculation for a posted vs non-posted journal. It appears you are looking at non-posted journals.
I don't have great data to test this with, but I just hacked this POC job together in 20 minutes, but it should have enough "bits" that you can run with it and get the information you need.
static void Job3(Args _args)
{
TaxCalculation taxCalculation;
LedgerJournalTrans ledgerJournalTrans;
TmpTaxWorkTrans tmpTaxWorkTrans;
TaxAmountCur taxAmountCur;
ledgerJournalTrans = LedgerJournalTrans::findRecId(5637293082, false); // Use your own journal line
// The reason we call the below stuff is `element.getShowTax()` and is called from `\Forms\LedgerJournalTransDaily\Designs\Design\[ActionPane:ActionPane]\[ActionPaneTab:ActionPaneTab]\[ButtonGroup:ButtonGroup]\MenuItemButton:TaxTransSource\Methods\clicked`
// This is from `\Classes\LedgerJournalEngine\getShowTax`
taxCalculation = LedgerJournalTrans::getTaxInstance(ledgerJournalTrans.JournalNum, ledgerJournalTrans.Voucher, ledgerJournalTrans.Invoice, true, null, false, ledgerJournalTrans.TransDate);
taxCalculation.sourceSingleLine(true, false);
// This is from `\Classes\TaxTmpWorkTransForm\initTax`
tmpTaxWorkTrans.setTmpData(taxCalculation.tmpTaxWorkTrans());
// This is the temporary table that is populated
while select tmpTaxWorkTrans
{
// This is from `\Classes\TaxTmpWorkTransForm\getSourceBaseAmountCur`
taxAmountCur = (tmpTaxWorkTrans.SourceTaxAmountCur * tmpTaxWorkTrans.taxChangeDisplaySign(null)); // I pass null because the map doesn't appear used...investigate?
// This just outputs some data
info(strFmt("%1: %2", tmpTaxWorkTrans.TaxCode, taxAmountCur));
}
}
Related
I've been trying to scrape a specific highchart, using console commands, something in the line off:
data = $('div#graphCont2').highcharts().series[0].data; { console.log(data)}
This code works on the following site, I retrieve all data.
test-hichart1
However, when I rework the code for the graph I intend to scrape (chart, Its the uppermost chart, APX-PSE for all X and Y entries), I miss data. It varies somehow (based on the timestamps, it seems to vary by the selected period), but I only get data from around timestamp 1562284800000 and onwards when the period is set to "all" (thus missing 2/3 of all entries).
I use this code:
data = $('div#stockchart_apx').highcharts().series[0].data; { console.log(data) }
My idea was to use a console.table to get the info I need, though I'm unsure if the table is usable past 999 entries anyway.
Does anyone have an idea of why the readout fluctuates and how I can retrieve all the information?
Thanks!
EDIT~ so, after a couple more hours, I managed to get all data by opening the graph in full-window mode. I'm unsure to where the differences originate from, but it worked. I scraped the data with:
data = $('div#stockchart_apx').highcharts().series[0].data;
const getCircularReplacer1 = () => {
const seen = new WeakSet();
return (key, value) => {
if (typeof value === "object" && value !== null) {
if (seen.has(value)) {
return;
}
seen.add(value);
}
return value;
};
};
JSON.stringify(data, getCircularReplacer1());
I Have the following model
class Process: Object {
#objc dynamic var processID:Int = 1
let steps = List<Step>()
}
class Step: Object {
#objc private dynamic var stepCode: Int = 0
#objc dynamic var stepDateUTC: Date? = nil
var stepType: ProcessStepType {
get {
return ProcessStepType(rawValue: stepCode) ?? .created
}
set {
stepCode = newValue.rawValue
}
}
}
enum ProcessStepType: Int { // to review - real value
case created = 0
case scheduled = 1
case processing = 2
case paused = 3
case finished = 4
}
A process can start, processing , paused , resume (to be in step processing again), pause , resume again,etc. the current step is the one with the latest stepDateUTC
I am trying to get all Processes, having for last step ,a step of stepType processing "processing ", ie. where for the last stepDate, stepCode is 2 .
I came with the following predicate... which doesn't work. Any idea of the right perform to perform such query ?
my best trial is the one. Is it possible to get to this result via one realm query .
let processes = realm.objects(Process.self).filter(NSPredicate(format: "ANY steps.stepCode = 2 AND NOT (ANY steps.stepCode = 4)")
let ongoingprocesses = processes.filter(){$0.steps.sorted(byKeyPath: "stepDateUTC", ascending: false).first!.stepType == .processing}
what I hoped would work
NSPredicate(format: "steps[LAST].stepCode = \(TicketStepType.processing.rawValue)")
I understand [LAST] is not supported by realm (as per the cheatsheet). but is there anyway around I could achieve my goal through a realm query?
There are a few ways to approach this and it doesn't appear the date property is relevant because lists are stored in sequential order (as long as they are not altered), so the last element in the List was added last.
This first piece of code will filter for processes where the last element is 'processing'. I coded this long-handed so the flow is more understandable.
let results = realm.objects(Process.self).filter { p in
let lastIndex = p.steps.count - 1
let step = p.steps[lastIndex]
let type = step.stepType
if type == .processing {
return true
}
return false
}
Note that Realm objects are lazily loaded - which means thousands of objects have a low memory impact. By filtering using Swift, the objects are filtered in memory so the impact is more significant.
The second piece of code is what I would suggest as it makes filtering much simpler, but would require a slight change to the Process model.
class Process: Object {
#objc dynamic var processID:Int = 1
let stepHistory = List<Step>() //RENAMED: the history of the steps
#objc dynamic var name = ""
//ADDED: new property tracks current step
#objc dynamic var current_step = ProcessStepType.created.index
}
My thought here is that the Process model keeps a 'history' of steps that have occurred so far, and then what the current_step is.
I also modified the ProcessStepType enum to make it more filterable friendly.
enum ProcessStepType: Int { // to review - real value
case created = 0
case scheduled = 1
case processing = 2
case paused = 3
case finished = 4
//this is used when filtering
var index: Int {
switch self {
case .created:
return 0
case .scheduled:
return 1
case .processing:
return 2
case .paused:
return 3
case .finished:
return 4
}
}
}
Then to return all processes where the last step in the list is 'processing' here's the filter
let results2 = realm.objects(Process.self).filter("current_step == %#", ProcessStepType.processing.index)
The final thought is to add some code to the Process model so when a step is added to the list, the current_step var is also updated. Coding that is left to the OP.
I am trying to pull the Enum chosen from a dialog and assign the label to a table's column.
For example: Dialog opens and allows you to choose from:
Surface
OutOfSpec
Other
These are 0,1,2 respectively.
The user chooses OutOfSpec (the label for this is Out Of Spec), I want to put this enum's Name, or the label, into a table. The column I'm inserting into is set to be a str.
Here's the code I've tried, without success:
SysDictEnum dictEnum = new SysDictEnum(enumNum(SDILF_ScrapReasons));
reason = dialog.addField(enumStr(SDILF_ScrapReasons),"Scrap Reason");
dialog.run();
if (!dialog.closedOk())
{
info(reason.value());
return;
}
ttsBegin;
// For now, this will strip off the order ID from the summary fields.
// No longer removing the Order ID
batchAttr = PdsBatchAttributes::find(itemId, invDim.inventBatchId, "OrderId");
orders = SDILF_BreakdownOrders::find(batchAttr.PdsBatchAttribValue, true);
if (orders)
{
orders.BoxProduced -= 1;
orders.update();
}
// Adding a batch attribute that will include the reason for scrapping
select forUpdate batchAttr;
batchAttr.PdsBatchAttribId = "ScrapReason";
//batchAttr.PdsBatchAttribValue = any2str(dictEnum.index2Value(reason.value()));
batchAttr.PdsBatchAttribValue = enum2str(reason.value());
batchAttr.InventBatchId = invDim.inventBatchId;
batchAttr.ItemId = itemId;
batchAttr.insert();
Obviously this is not the whole code, but it should be enough to give the issue that I'm trying to solve.
I'm sure there is a way to get the int value and use that to assign the label, I've just not been able to figure it out yet.
EDIT
To add some more information about what I am trying to accomplish. We make our finished goods, sometimes they are out of spec or damaged when this happens we then have to scrap that finished good. When we do this we want to keep track of why it is being scrapped, but we don't want just a bunch of random reasons. I used an enum to limit the reasons. When the operator clicks the button to scrap something they will get a dialog screen pop-up that allows them to select a reason for scrapping. The code will then, eventually, put that assigned reason on that finished items batch attributes so that we can track it later in a report and have a list of all the finished goods that were scrapped and why they were scrapped.
I'm not entirely sure of your question, but I think you're just missing one of the index2[...] calls or you're not getting the return value from your dialog correctly. Just create the below as a new job, run it, make a selection of Open Order and click ok.
I don't know the difference between index2Label and index2Name.
static void Job67(Args _args)
{
Dialog dialog = new dialog();
SysDictEnum dictEnum = new SysDictEnum(enumNum(SalesStatus));
DialogField reason;
SalesStatus salesStatusUserSelection;
str label, name, symbol;
int value;
reason = dialog.addField(enumStr(SalesStatus), "SalesStatus");
dialog.run();
if (dialog.closedOk())
{
salesStatusUserSelection = reason.value();
// Label
label = dictEnum.index2Label(salesStatusUserSelection);
// Name
name = dictEnum.index2Name(salesStatusUserSelection);
// Symbol
symbol = dictEnum.index2Symbol(salesStatusUserSelection);
// Value
value = dictEnum.index2Value(salesStatusUserSelection);
info(strFmt("Label: %1; Name: %2; Symbol: %3; Value: %4", label, name, symbol, value));
}
}
I have coded a table driven LR(1) parser and it is working very well however I am having a bit of a disconnect on the stage of turing a parse into a syntax tree/abstract syntax tree. This is a project that I m very passionate about but I have really just hit a dead end here. Thank you for your help in advance.
Edit: Also my parser just uses a 2d array and an action object that tells it where to go next or if its a reduction where to go and how many items to pop. I noticed that many people use the visitor pattern. Im not sure how they know what type of node to make.
Here is the pushdown automata for context
while (lexer.hasNext() || parseStack.size() > 0) {
Action topOfStack = parseStack.peek();
token = parseStack.size() > 0 ? lexer.nextToken() : new Token(TokenType.EOF, "EOF");
topOfStack.setToken(token);
int row = topOfStack.getTransitionIndex();
int column = getTerminalIndex(token.getLexeme());
column = token.getType() == TokenType.IDENTIFIER
&& !terminalsContain(token.getLexeme()) ? 0 : column;
Action action = actionTable[row][column];
if (action instanceof Accept) {
System.out.println("valid parse!!!!!!");
} else if (action instanceof Reduction) {
Reduction reduction = (Reduction) action;
popStack(parseStack, reduction.getNumberOfItemsToPop());
column = reduction.getTransitionIndex();
row = parseStack.peek().getTransitionIndex();
parseStack.push(new Action(gotoTable[row][column]));
lexer.backupTokenStream();
} else if (action != null) {
parseStack.push(actionTable[row][column]);
} else {
System.out.println("Parse error");
System.out.println("On token: " + token.getLexeme());
break;
}
Each reduction in the LR parsing process corresponds to an internal node in the parse tree. The rule being reduced is the internal AST node, and the items popped off the stack correspond to the children of that internal node. The item pushed for the goto corresponds to the internal node, while those pushed by shift actions correspond to leaves (tokens) of the AST.
Putting all that together, you can easily build an AST by createing a new internal node every time you do a reduction and wiring everything together appropriately.
I have a query form in a jspx file and i'm trying to define some of the values as case sensitive, meaning that i want to be able to find, for example, a name with all letters upper case and/or lower case and obtain the values that i would obtain if i've inserted the name correctly.
Can someone indicate me where can i find something to accomplish that?
Thanks in advance
--------Update
Code from my jspx file
<af:query id="qryId1" headerText="Search" disclosed="true"
value="#bindings.ImplicitViewCriteriaQuery.queryDescriptor}"
model="#bindings.ImplicitViewCriteriaQuery.queryModel}"
queryListener="#bindings.ImplicitViewCriteriaQuery.processQuery}"
queryOperationListener="#{bindings.ImplicitViewCriteriaQuery.processQueryOperation}"
resultComponentId="::resId1"
binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_SearchCustomer.qryId1}"
maxColumns="3" rows="2" fieldWidth="30%"
displayMode="compact" saveResultsLayout="never"
saveQueryMode="hidden" modeChangeVisible="false"/>
In a view criteria, for each criteria item there is a check box Ignore Case. Uncheck it if you want to make that search field case sensitive.
If you are using All Queriable Attributes to create your search then you can set it in queryListner method of the query component. Here are the steps:
Create a queryListener method for your query component
<af:query id="qryId1" headerText="Search" disclosed="true"
value="#{bindings.ImplicitViewCriteriaQuery.queryDescriptor}"
model="#{bindings.ImplicitViewCriteriaQuery.queryModel}"
queryListener="#{backingBeanScope.searchBean.queryListener}"
queryOperationListener="#{bindings.ImplicitViewCriteriaQuery.processQueryOperation}"
resultComponentId="::resId1"/>
Make query attributes case insensitive in queryListener method
public void queryListener(QueryEvent queryEvent)
{
QueryDescriptor qdesc = (QueryDescriptor) queryEvent.getDescriptor();
ConjunctionCriterion conCrit = qdesc.getConjunctionCriterion();
//access the list of search fields
List<Criterion> criterionList = conCrit.getCriterionList();
for (Criterion criterion: criterionList)
{
((AttributeCriterion) criterion).setMatchCase(false);
}
invokeMethodExpression( "#{bindings.ImplicitViewCriteriaQuery.processQuery}", queryEvent);
}
private void invokeMethodExpression(String expr, QueryEvent queryEvent)
{
FacesContext fctx = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
ELContext elContext = fctx.getELContext();
ExpressionFactory eFactory =
fctx.getApplication().getExpressionFactory();
MethodExpression mexpr =
eFactory.createMethodExpression(elContext, expr, Object.class,
new Class[]
{ QueryEvent.class });
mexpr.invoke(elContext, new Object[]
{ queryEvent });
}