Having a strange behavior using simple html dom
$html = str_get_html($output, true, true, DEFAULT_TARGET_CHARSET, false);
Than
var_dump($html->find('title', 0));
returns an object. It's ok
But
var_dump($html->find('body', 0));
returns NULL.
I can't understand what's wrong.
mb_detect_encoding($output);
returns UTF-8 - all seems to be ok with the string.
I increased MAX_FILE_SIZE to 6000000 - it not helps (((
Just wrote mbstring.func_overload 0 in php.ini and all things begin to work perfectly.
May be this helps somebody else.
Related
I've got a QSharedPointer to a QMultiHash. When I try to get the QMultiHash from the QSharedPointer it messes up. My thinking is that the QHash part of the QMultiHash is unaccessible.
QSharedPointer<QMultiHash<int, JB_Node*>> aNewNodesMH(new QMultiHash<int, JB_Node*>());
aNewNodesMH->insert(1, pNode);
QVector<QSharedPointer<QMultiHash<int, JB_Node*>>> nodesMHV;
nodesMHV.append(aNewNodesMH);
QSharedPointer<QMultiHash<int, JB_Node*>> aMHp = nodesMHV.value(0);
QMultiHash<int, JB_Node*> aMH = (*aMHp); // messes up here
QHashIterator<int, JB_Node*> i(aMH);
while (i.hasNext()){
i.next();
....
Any way of fixing this so that it works OR is there another way of getting a Vector of QMultiHash's?
Cheers
Jeff
Here's the code for my paint method in my Win32 project:
case WM_PAINT:
_tcscat_s(greeting, sizeof(greeting), LoadedFile);
hdc = BeginPaint(hWnd, &ps);
TextOut(hdc,
5, 5,
greeting, _tcslen(greeting));
EndPaint(hWnd, &ps);
break;
I am consistently getting the error that either the stack around greeting or around ps is corrupted. To be clear, greeting is initialized like:
TCHAR greeting[100] = _T("Welcome! Your file is ");
And LoadedFile is initialized like this:
TCHAR LoadedFile[100];
LoadedFile[0] = 0;
LoadedFile is not yet changed by anything, so it shouldn't be adding anything to greeting. I've tried things like
sizeof(greeting) + 1
Which just shifts the error. Not sure what's wrong here.
Edit: Without the _tcscat_s(), call the window loads normally
Well, I found the problem, even though I don't really understand why the solution works. I just changed
_tcscat_s(greeting, sizeof(greeting), LoadedFile);
to
_tcscat_s(greeting, 100, LoadedFile);
I have a function that's called when a file download has reported progress:
private function progressHandler(event:ProgressEvent):void
{
var percent:Number = Math.round((event.bytesLoaded / event.bytesTotal) * 100.0);
Alert.show(event.bytesLoaded.toString());
//pb.setProgress(percent, 100);
}
Now, this should work fine but unfortunately, event.bytesLoaded is returning much larger values than it should. For a test file (8555 bytes), bytesLoaded goes all the way up to 8973384.
Any ideas why this might be happening?
Amarghosh, in his comment, gave the hint that lead to a solution.
"Is the file 8555 kilobytes - because the number you gave is close to 8555 * 1024"
Is it possible to specify MXML-esque "binding strings" in ActionScript?
For example, I want to be able to do something like:
MXMLBinding(this, "first_item",
this, "{myArrayCollection.getItemAt(0)");
MXMLBinding(this, ["nameLbl", "text"],
this, "Name: {somePerson.first} {somePerson.last}");
Edit: thanks for the responses and suggestions… Basically, it seems like you can't do this. I've dug around and figured out why.
(Shameless plug)
BindageTools can do this:
Bind.fromProperty(this, "myArrayCollection", itemAt(0))
.toProperty(this, "first_item");
Bind.fromAll(
Bind.fromProperty(this, "somePerson.first"),
Bind.fromProperty(this, "somePerson.last")
)
.format("Name: {0} {1}")
.toProperty(this, "nameLbl.text");
Note that BindageTools puts the source object first and the destination last (whereas BindingUtils puts the destination first and the source last).
Using ChangeWatcher (e.g., via BindingUtils.bindProperty or .bindSetter) is the way to go, yes. I admit it's a strange notation, but once you get used to it, it makes sense, works perfectly and is quite flexible, too.
Of course, you could always wrap those functions yourself somehow, if the notation bugged you -- both methods are static, so doing so in a way that feels more appropriate to your application should be a fairly straightforward exercise.
I could use BindingUtils or ChainWatcher, but then I'd end up with code that looks something like this:
…
BindingUtils.bindSetter(updateName, this, ["somePerson", "first"]);
BindingUtils.bindSetter(updateName, this, ["somePerson", "last"]);
…
protected function updateName(...ignored):void {
this.nameLbl.text = "Name: " + somePerson.first + " " + somePerson.last;
}
Which is just a little bit ugly… And the first example, binding to arrayCollection.getItemAt(0), is even worse.
Does the first parameter (function) of BindingUtils.bindSetter method accept anonymous methods?
BindingUtils.bindSetter(function()
{
this.nameLbl.text = "Name: " + somePerson.first + " " + somePerson.last;
}, this, ["somePerson", "last"]);
I hate anonymous methods and obviously it's even more uglier - so I won't recommend that even if it works, but just wondering if it works.
Never the answer anyone wants to hear, but just manage this stuff with getters/setters in ActionScript. With a proper MVC, it's dead simple to manually set your display fields.
public function set myArrayCollection(value:Array):void {
myAC = new ArrayCollection(value);
first_item = mcAC.getItemAt(0); // or value[0];
}
etc....
Alright, so I've done some digging, and here's what's up.
Bindings in MXML are, contrary to reason, setup by Java code (modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/as3/binding/DataBindingFirstPassEvaluator.java, if I'm not mistaken) at compile time.
For example, the binding: first_item="{myArrayCollection.getItemAt(0)}"` is expanded into, among other things, this:
// writeWatcher id=0 shouldWriteSelf=true class=flex2.compiler.as3.binding.PropertyWatcher shouldWriteChildren=true
watchers[0] = new mx.binding.PropertyWatcher("foo",
{ propertyChange: true }, // writeWatcherListeners id=0 size=1
[ bindings[0] ],
propertyGetter);
// writeWatcher id=1 shouldWriteSelf=true class=flex2.compiler.as3.binding.FunctionReturnWatcher shouldWriteChildren=true
watchers[1] = new mx.binding.FunctionReturnWatcher("getItemAt",
target,
function():Array { return [ 0 ]; },
{ collectionChange: true },
[bindings[0]],
null);
// writeWatcherBottom id=0 shouldWriteSelf=true class=flex2.compiler.as3.binding.PropertyWatcher
watchers[0].updateParent(target);
// writeWatcherBottom id=1 shouldWriteSelf=true class=flex2.compiler.as3.binding.FunctionReturnWatcher
// writeEvaluationWatcherPart 1 0 parentWatcher
watchers[1].parentWatcher = watchers[0];
watchers[0].addChild(watchers[1]);
This means that it is simply impossible to setup curly-brace MXML-style bindings at runtime because the code to do it does not exist in ActionScript.
I encounter this problem repeatedly, and haven't a clue what is causing it. I get an exception in the DataBind: SelectedValue which is invalid because it does not exist in the list of items.
Here are some important pieces of information:
I reload listOrgs periodically when the underlying data has changed.
The Organization.DTListAll call returns 2 Int, String pairs.
There are no duplicate or null values in the returned data
After the first two lines below, listOrgs.Items.Count is 0, and the Selected Value is 0
The selected value after the DataBind operation executes is the ID value from the first row in the data
This exception happens the very first time this code is executed after a fresh page load
listOrgs.Items.Clear();
listOrgs.SelectedValue = "0";
listOrgs.DataSource = new Organization().DTListAll(SiteID);
listOrgs.DataTextField = "OrganizationName";
listOrgs.DataValueField = "OrganizationID";
listOrgs.DataBind();
Apparently the solution I posted wasn't entirely effective... Eventually in my application I changed to this:
listOrgs.Items.Clear();
listOrgs.SelectedIndex = -1;
listOrgs.SelectedValue = null;
listOrgs.ClearSelection(); // Clears the selection to avoid the exception (only one of these should be enough but in my application I needed all..)
listOrgs.DataSource = new Organization().DTListAll(SiteID);
listOrgs.DataTextField = "OrganizationName";
listOrgs.DataValueField = "OrganizationID";
listOrgs.DataBind();
I kept getting this error.
Weird thing is that before I set the datasource and rebind after deleting an item the selected index = -1.
If I explicitly set the selectedIndex = -1; then it works and doesn't throw an error.
So even though it was already -1 setting it to -1 stops it from erroring.
Weird eh?
Try setting listOrgs.SelectedValue = "0" after you refresh the DataSource
At the moment you are trying to select the first item in an empty list.
Change the first two line with this :
listOrgs.SelectedItem.Selected = false;
listOrgs.Items.Clear();
In case you still have this problem this is how i resolved it:
listOrgs.SelectedIndex = -1; // Clears the SelectedIndex to avoid the exception
listOrgs.DataSource = new Organization().DTListAll(SiteID);
listOrgs.DataTextField = "OrganizationName";
listOrgs.DataValueField = "OrganizationID";
listOrgs.DataBind(); //Unless you have "listOrgs.AppendDataBoundItems = true" you don't need to clear the list
#PMarques answer helped me out and did solve my problem.
However whilst experimenting, it clicked in my head why I was gettign the error in the first place.
I was setting the "Text" attribute thinking that it might create an encompassing label or fieldset + legend, for me (which it doesn't).
The Text property for a list is infact the SelectedValue property for a ListControl.
So my mistake in misinterpreting what the text property did.
Not sure it is your case, but I had the same problem and apparently there was no explanation, then I realized doing a copy and paste on notepad of a field of database that at the beginning of the value there was a NULL.
Curious thing was that a select joining tables was working. I deleted the row and reinserted, after was working fine.
I was getting the same error repeatedly and try ending up by not setting the default selected value to Index -1.
I commented my code ddlDRIBidAmt.SelectedValue = -1
This value was set at the time where my Page Controls were reset to default values.
I know its too late to answer, but what I tried is an dirty solution but it worked.
After databinding, I am insert a item at index 0
ddl.Items.Insert(0, new ListItem("---Select---","-1"));
And on setting,
I am placing try catch, In catch i am setting Value to -1