In the following code fragment I am trying to find in my responseBody a specific number by a variable and thus save its brother value.
However when I try to do it that way he answers me null and if I remove the quotes he answers me:
The parameter "n0" was used but not defined. Define parameters using the JsonPath.params(...) function
Response response = get(keyrest);
System.out.println("Value 0: " + response.asString());
semilla = response.path("seed");
String v1 = response.path("keys.find{it.number == 'n0'}.value");
Related
// I have a custom metadata object named boatNames__mdt and I'm using two methods to get a list of picklist values in a String[];
First Method
Map<String, boatNames__mdt> mapEd = boatNames__mdt.getAll();
string boatTypes = (string) mapEd.values()[0].BoatPick__c;
// BoatPick__c is a textarea field (Eg: 'Yacht, Sailboat')
string[] btWRAP = new string[]{};
**btWRAP**.addAll(boatTypes.normalizeSpace().split(','));
Second Method
string[] strL = new string[]{};
Schema.DescribeFieldResult dfr = Schema.SObjectType.boatNames__mdt.fields.BoatTypesPicklist__c;
// BoatTypesPicklist__c is a picklist field (Picklist Values: 'Yacht, Sailboat')
PicklistEntry[] picklistValues = dfr.getPicklistValues();
for (PicklistEntry pick : picklistValues){
**strl**.add((string) pick.getLabel());
}
Map with SOQL query
Map<Id, BoatType__c> boatMap = new Map<Id, BoatType__c>
([Select Id, Name from BoatType__c Where Name in :btWRAP]);
When I run the above Map with SOQL query(btWRAP[]) no records show up.
But when I used it using the strl[] records do show up.
I'm stunned!
Can you please explain why two identical String[] when used in exact SOQL queries behave so different?
You are comparing different things so you get different results. Multiple fails here.
mapEd.values()[0].BoatPick__c - this takes 1st element. At random. Are you sure you have only 1 element in there? You might be getting random results, good luck debugging.
normalizeSpace() and trim() - you trim the string but after splitting you don't trim the components. You don't have Sailboat, you have {space}Sailboat
String s = 'Yacht, Sailboat';
List<String> tokens = s.normalizeSpace().split(',');
System.debug(tokens.size()); // "2"
System.debug(tokens); // "(Yacht, Sailboat)", note the extra space
System.debug(tokens[1].charAt(0)); // "32", space's ASCII number
Try splitting by "comma, optionally followed by space/tab/newline/any other whitespace symbol": s.split(',\\s*'); or call normalize in a loop over the split's results?
pick.getLabel() - in code never compare using picklist labels unless you really know what you're doing. Somebody will translate the org to German, French etc and your code will break. Compare to getValue()
Please help me to get the a value from SIP INVITE header reached to kamailio like INVITE sip:+341930203454#sub.domain.com;myid=+34#sub.domain.com SIP/2.0 and i want to save the myid value +34 into a variable, without the domain name.
$var(uri) = $sel(ruri);
xavp_params_explode("$(var(uri){s.unbracket})", "uri");
xlog("L_INFO", "$var(uri) Received converted to $xavp(uri=>myid[0])\n");
I tried above and it prints +34#sub.domain.com But i want to just save +34 into a variable to further check the prefix based routing from the database.
Could you please help how to get it or If there is any alternate/single line approach to get this value, please help.
thanks in advance.
An one line statement variant can be:
$var(result) = $(ru{uri.param,myid}{s.select,0,#});
Where:
$ru - is the request URI (sip address in the first line of request)
{uri.param,myid} - is a transformation returning the value of a parameter (myid in this case) in a URI
{s.select,0,#} - is a transformation returning first token from a string by splitting it using the delimiter #
I think something like this will work:
$var(uri) = $sel(ruri);
$var(myid-param) = $(var(uri){param.value,myid}); # this should return +34#sub.domain.com
$var(sip-myid-param) = "sip:" + $var(myid-param); # this should return sip:+34#sub.domain.com
$var(user-part) = $(var(sip-myid-param){uri.user}); # this should return +34
All above string operation is possible to put in one line, I used several lines just to show it in simple way.
In one line it should be something like below, but please do not quote me on this, but I hope you can get an idea
$var(user-part) = $(var("sip:" + $var($(var(uri){param.value,myid}))){uri.user});
I'm currently trying to connect a Lua Script with a GS WebApp. The connection is working but due to my lack of knowledge in GScripting I'm not sure why it isn't saving my data correctly.
In the Lua side I'm just passing in a hard-code a random name and simple numerical userid.
local HttpService = game:GetService("HttpService")
local scriptID = scriptlink
local WebApp
local function updateSpreadSheet ()
local playerData = (scriptID .. "?userid=123&name:Jhon Smith")
WebApp = HttpService:GetAsync(playerData)
end
do
updateSpreadSheet()
end
On the Google Script side i'm only saving the data on the last row and then add the value of the userid and the name.
function doGet(e) {
console.log(e)
// console.log(f)
callName(e.parameter.userid,e.parameter.name);
}
function callName(userid,name) {
// Get the last Row and add the name provided
var sheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet();
sheet.getRange(sheet.getLastRow() + 1,1).setValues([userid],[name]);
}
However, the only data the script is saving is the name, bypassing the the userid for reasons I have yet to discover.
setValues() requires a 2D array and range dimensions should correspond to that array. The script is only getting 1 x 1 range and setValues argument is not a 2D array. Fix the syntax or use appendRow
sheet.getRange(sheet.getLastRow() + 1,1,1,2).setValues([[userid,name]]);
//or
sheet.appendRow([userid,name])
References:
appendRow
Is there any way to pass a list of search strings in the contains() method of FilterExpression in DynamoDb?
Something like below:
search_str = ['value-1', 'value-2', 'value-3']
result = kb_table.scan(
FilterExpression="contains (title, :titleVal)",
ExpressionAttributeValues={ ":titleVal": search_str }
)
For now I can only think of looping through the list and scanning the table multiple times (as in below code), but I think it will be resource heavy.
for item in search_str:
result += kb_table.scan(
FilterExpression="contains (title, :titleVal)",
ExpressionAttributeValues={ ":titleVal": item }
)
Any suggestions.
For the above scenario, the CONTAINS should be used with OR condition. When you give array as input for CONTAINS, DynamoDB will check for the SET attribute ("SS", "NS", or "BS"). It doesn't looks for the sub-sequence on the string attribute.
If the target attribute of the comparison is of type String, then the
operator checks for a substring match. If the target attribute of the
comparison is of type Binary, then the operator looks for a
subsequence of the target that matches the input. If the target
attribute of the comparison is a set ("SS", "NS", or "BS"), then the
operator evaluates to true if it finds an exact match with any member
of the set.
Example:-
movies1 = "MyMovie"
movies2 = "Big New"
fe1 = Attr('title').contains(movies1)
fe2 = Attr('title').contains(movies2)
response = table.scan(
FilterExpression=fe1 or fe2
)
a little bit late but to allow people to find a solution i give here my method.
lets assume that in your DB you have a props called 'EMAIL you want to filter your scan on this EMAIL with a list of value. you can proceed as following.
list_of_elem=['mail1#mail.com','mail2#mail.com','mail3#mail.com']
#set an empty string to create your query
stringquery=""
# loop each element in your list
for index,value in enumerate(list_of_elem):
# add your query of contains with mail value
stringquery=stringquery+f"Attr('EMAIL').contains('{value }')"
# while your value is not the last element in list add the 'OR' operator
if index < len(list_of_elem)-1:
stringquery=stringquery+ ' | '
dynamodb = boto3.resource('dynamodb')
# Use eval of your query string to parse the string as filter expression
tableUser = dynamodb.Table('mytable')
tableUser.scan(
FilterExpression=eval(stringquery)
)
I try to group by my customize movieLense dataset
groupBy<- data.table(unifiedTbl)
x<- groupBy[,list(rating=sum(rating)
,Unknown=sum(unknown)
,Action=sum(Action)
,Adventure = sum(Adventure)
,Animation = sum(Animation)
,"Children's" = sum(Children's)
),by=list(user_id,age,occupation)]
but because of Children's I received some error which related to specified character
If I remove below part of my code every things is OK
,"Children's" = sum(Children's)
Now my question is how can I address to this column with full name?
how can I fix my codes?
You can use backticks with names that aren't valid syntax:
`Children's` = sum(`Children's`)
And of course, I'd recommend creating valid names instead:
setnames(groupBy, make.names(names(groupBy)))