I generated code for an HTML view page, to show BS Tool Tip against each column in the table. The content of the Tool Tip, also table-like structure. I made it using divs, but on div has long content not aligned correctly as a table
can you help me to correct this change?
Severity level is the second row, the value against the severity level is the long one. I need to align the severity level against the starting of the corresponding value
HTML (generated through rails template)
<div data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="right" data-html="true" title="" data-animation="true" data-original-title="
<div style = 'width:200px,'>
<div class ='tool-tip-cells'>Repair Method </div>
<div class ='tool-tip-cells'> Repaint </div><div class ='tool-tip-cells'>Severity Level</div>
<div class ='tool-tip-cells'>Damage 2.5cm to 7.5cm in length and/or diameter</div>
<div class ='tool-tip-cells'>Estimate No.</div>
<div class ='tool-tip-cells'>9176863</div>
<div>">Rear Bumper RHS (Scuffed)</div>
CSS
.tool-tip-cells{
text-align: left;
width: 100px;
display: inline-block;
}
You can try this code :
vertical-align: text-top;
Related
I am creating a web page and wanted to use a system similar to foundations/ bootstrap with defined columns and rows. I am happy with what I have so far, however I am not sure how I can center a column within a row, while still using a defined grid system.
I know usually the html is formatted like this:
<div class="column column-6 center">
http://codepen.io/Kiwimoose/pen/dpvEqO
Is what I have so far,
I am just not sure how the "center" tag is usually formatted in foundations. I would like to have the column in the second row centered, as well as others in the future.
Your code is OK, you just have to change the order in CSS:
.column {
position: relative;
float: left;
display: block;
}
.center {
margin:auto;
float:none;
}
Style .center class after . column class and it will work.
BTW, it is a good idea to clean up your code a little bit.
Try
<div align="center">
And then you can customize it in the css that you're doing
In Zurb foundation you can use "-offset-" and "end" class names,
for example
<div class="row">
<div class="large-6 large-offset-3 end columns">6 centered</div>
</div>
docs here
to center properly (with no headaches) with Twitter Bootstrap you can simply set empty divs as follows:
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xs-3"></div>
<div class="col-xs-6">
centered div in all resolutions
</div>
<div class="col-xs-3"></div>
</div>
Or you can use offset too
I'm using the Bootstrap 3 grid to hide/show nav bar content based on whether or not the user is using an extra small device.
I'm using .hidden-xs and .visible-xs classes. These classes appropriately hide/show the content, but I'm running into two problems:
(1) Hiding the content also shrinks the column spacing by .col-xs-5 because the div is hidden. I tried adding .visible-xs to a subsequent div and using .col-xs-5 to make up the empty space. This works, but only if I place content inside the divs. I just want the columns to be spaced out.
(2) On XS view size, the final item on the Nav bar "Nav" jumps to the next row. I have only accounted for 12 total columns.
See this JSFiddle. I'm trying to nly show "Welcome" on large view and show nothing on XS view.
I here's an idea, you can try instead of adding content. This CSS trick uses :before and :after CSS pseudo-classes.
.no_content {
display: block;
content: "";
width: 151px;
height: 35px;
background: transparent url(tape.png) 0 0 no-repeat;
}
<div class="no_content"></div>
I would look at the grid system further. I believe there is an offset that you can use to offset the div like this:
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xs-5 col-xs-offset-5></div>
<div class="col-xs-2></div>
</div>
Use the pull-right bootstrap class instead of trying to make empty div's fill in the space.
Completely remove the div you added in item (1) to "make up the space". On the div containing "Nav" set the class as pull-right col-xs-1. So the code from your JSFiddle becomes:
<div class="container">
<div class="row" id="header">
<div class="col-xs-5" id="brand-wrapper">
<div class="brand">Brand</div>
</div>
<!-- Hidden on XS Devices -->
<div class="hidden-xs col-xs-5">
<p>
Welcome
</p>
</div>
<!-- Nav -->
<div class="pull-right col-xs-1" id="toggle-wrapper">
<p>Nav</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
I have a 3-column layout that works pretty well:
http://jsfiddle.net/nicorellius/YNyHW/7/
My goal is to add a pre-existing modular unit into the center div, the one with class two-inner. The markup is like so:
<html>
<head></head>
<body>
<div>
<div class="container">
<div class="one">
<div class="one-inner"></div>
</div>
<div class="two">
<div class="two-inner"></div>
</div>
<div class="three">
<div class="three-inner"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
The CSS can be seen in the fiddle. Part of the modular unit is actually built from some PHP where some data from a database is fetched and displayed. I have some arrays that I'm using for testing that mimic 6 entries and gives the modular unit a 2-wide by 3-tall box layout. My problem is that when I add this unit into the layout above, I get something like the test site below.
The markup for the modular unit is like so:
<section class="unit">
<section class="buttons margin-top-2em">
<div class="button-fixed-width">
<button type="button" class="<bootstrap-button>">button 1</button>
</div>
<div class="button-fixed-width">
<button type="button" class="<bootstrap-button>">button 2</button>
</div>
<div class="button-fixed-width">
<button type="button" class="<bootstrap-button>">button 3</button>
</div>
</section>
<div class="row">
<?php // loop through some arrays to get module unit ?>
</div>
</section>
I've tried various tweaks to try and get it up but the only thing that does it is making the heights of the outer classes one, two, and three close to zero.
Although I've tried changing heights and other bits to get it to fit, I'm still having trouble figuring out why that center div won't go up. What am I missing?
The CSS for the unit class is in the fiddle. On it's own, it works OK, and I have some breakpoints that collapse it down into a single column. I just cant get passed this part...
EDIT
After trying some ideas from #kozlovski5, I am able to get the divmoving up and down as I need. But there is something going on that is making me uneasy. I'm not too familiar with the display: table, display: table-cell layout so Im sure I'm missing something. For example, when I add text to the divs in question, either the classes one, two, or three, or the inner classes, the adjustments recommended by #kozlovski5 go away. So in other words if I don't use top: -37.5em; and just fill the divs with text, everything seems to work as it should. It's when I try to model the layout with bordered sections that I get the strange behavior.
I ended up going with floats instead. See test site above for final.
I applied:
div > .modular {
display: block;
}
This seems to solve the problem. Here is an updated jsFiddle. http://jsfiddle.net/YNyHW/4/
OP has provided a test case for his website, so my updated answer is:
.two-inner {
background-color: #cba;
border: 1px solid gray;
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: relative;
top: -596px;
left: 0;
}
Ugghhh.. Another Edit
I think the whole display: table and div > div. { display: table-cell;} is causing this issue and instead of working on patches let's hit the problem head straigh on instead of working on fixes.
Just get rid of the display table etc. And use floats instead here is an example:
http://jsfiddle.net/YNyHW/6/
I have this html:
<div class="speaker-list">
<div class="view-content">
<div class="views-row views-row-1 views-row-odd views-row-first">
<div class="views-field views-field-title">
<span class="field-content">
Keith Anderson
</span>
</div>
<div class="views-field views-field-field-job-title">
<div class="field-content">VP, Digital Advisory</div>
</div>
<div class="views-field views-field-field-company">
<div class="field-content">RetailNet Group</div>
</div>
<div class="views-field views-field-title-1">
<span class="field-content">
Store of the Future
</span>
</div>
<div class="views-field views-field-field-headshot">
<div class="field-content">
<div id="file-53" class="file file-image file-image-jpeg contextual-links-region">
<div class="content">
<img typeof="foaf:Image" src="/kanderson.jpg" width="180" height="180" alt="" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
It's dynamically generated by a Drupal view, so I can't change the output html at all. I need to work with what is here. Here's the desired result:
Without any styling on the headshot, this is what it looks like:
I tried to style the image to force it to float to the left of the text:
.view-speaker-list div.view-content div.views-row div.views-field
div.field-content div.file-image div.content img {
border: 1px solid #666;
float: left;
position: relative; /* tried with and without position (inc. absolute) */
left: 30px;
}
Obviously I'm doing something wrong, because this is what I get (with relative position):
and with absolute position:
I've also tried putting the float on the "uppermost" div class that holds the image, with no position on the div:
.view-speaker-list div.view-content div.views-row
div.views-field-field-headshot {
float: left;
}
It gives the same result as the position: relative screenshot.
Where am I going wrong? If I had control over the html I'd do it differently, but I'm not sure how to deal with all of these nested divs.
EDITED TO ADD NEW SCREENSHOT FOR #WEX
Here's what it looks like when I tried to use your code with the html reordered - http://jsfiddle.net/mPa7z/
I'll try to explain the "right" way to use float so that you can see why your way didn't work.
In your post, you try to apply float: left to the <div> surrounding your image, but that technique only works when the element you are floating is above all the elements you want to wrap around it. That "may" solve your problem, but that technique has it's pitfalls if you're trying to use it to create two distinct columns - if the text on the right is taller than the floated element, the text on the right will wrap below it. So then you have to add another container around your non-floated elements to ensure that it won't wrap. This solves your problem, but doesn't really help if you can't even edit your markup!
I'd argue that the technique I've posted below works better, and solves your problem: http://jsfiddle.net/Wexcode/AQQwX/
.view-content {
position: relative;
min-height: 180px;
padding: 0 0 0 180px; }
.views-row { padding: 20px 0 0 20px; }
.views-field-field-headshot {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0; }
If you have access to the View itself in Drupal, you can reorder the elements. When logged into Drupal, open the View (in Drupal 7: Structure > Views > Viewname), look for "Fields" and click on the triangle next to "add", which will have a popup, then click "rearrange". You can then drag the photo field to be the first item in the View, then adjust your CSS to float the image to the left.
EmmyS,
Instead of trying to get the headshot to float:left, have you considered making the others float:right? This will give the impression that the image is floating left without having to change the markup in any way.
div.speaker-list div.views-row > div.views-field {
float:right;
clear:both;
}
div.speaker-list div.views-row > div.views-field.views-field-field-headshot {
float:none;
clear:none;
}
The above CSS should work with that specific configuration without altering any of your other Drupal generated markup. In order to make sure that other CSS does not interfere, I've applied as much specificity as possible. Since the headshot will be back in the containing <div>, you shouldn't need to alter the size of it unless the store is simply too large (I don't know without looking at your data). Finally the CSS is concise, so you can add any additional styling you need on a per-element basis.
Hope this helps,
FuzzicalLogic
When you can drop somewhere else on the page some code, you can gain control over the HTML by using jQuery. Then you could make modifications to the DOM tree.
But I do not understand why you can not edit the HTML. Isn't Drupal open source? You should be able to find the file using FTP and manipulate it.
I have a tile that displays information but also needs to be a link. If the user clicks anywhere on the tile it needs to take them to the appropriate action.
Below is an image of what I have created.
The HTML
<div class="tile">
<div class="tile-text">Runs</div>
<div class="tile-text details">Manage runs, routes, races, and goals</div>
<div id="runs" class="tile-text live">You have a four mile run today</div>
</div>
Now if I create an ActionLink, it will create the blue tile, but I am unsure of how to get the three child divs inside of the ActionLink.
I have tried the following ActionLink:
#Html.ActionLink("Runs", "Index", "Run", null, new { #class = "tile-text" })
This creates the following image:
So basically, how do I get the tile to link to the Action and still have all of the three child divs inside of it?
You could add a onclick="window.location.href='link'" attribute on the tile <div>, and style it with cursor: pointer to make it look like a link, if needed.
Example:
<div class="tile" onclick="window.location.href='link'">
<div class="tile-text">Runs</div>
<div class="tile-text details">Manage runs, routes, races, and goals</div>
<div id="runs" class="tile-text live">You have a four mile run today</div>
</div>
Or you could make the tile <div> be an <a> element and style it to be display: block and to include the appropriate width and height, then make all its children <span>s with display: block.
Example:
<style type="text/css">
.tile, .tile-text { display: block; }
// You could add width and height to .tile if needed.
// Also, if you want to put tiles next to each other, inline-block for .tile
// would be more appropriate.
</style>
<a class="tile" href="link">
<span class="tile-text">Runs</span>
<span class="tile-text details">Manage runs, routes, races, and goals</span>
<span id="runs" class="tile-text live">You have a four mile run today</span>
</a>
You need to have the blue tile as an actual image. This clickable image should be placed in a div.
With CSS you can then put the image behind the text content using z-index / absolute positioning.
This is a quick implementation of Radu's option 2.
All you need to do now is tidy it up and move the inline css into the css for your a class called title.
<body>
<a class="tile" href="#" style="width: 200px; height: 300px; background-color: lightblue; display: block;">
<h3 class="tile-text">Runs</h3>
<p class="tile-text-details">Manage runs, routes, races, and goals</p>
<p class="runs" class="tile-text-live">You have a four mile run today</p>
</a>
</body>