I am facing the issue while when i am trying to configure the postSharp(3.1.46). Before configuration application working fine.
I found few observation.
Application build on vb.Net 4.0 framework.It is normal web application with visual studio 2010.
Every Page EnableSessionstate =false.
Web service session is enable in "inproc" mode and EnableSessionstate=true.
We configure the POSTSHARP using postsharp.dl only not any postsharp dll like Pattern/modell.
We are using postsharp for capture the log.We are using only this class OnMethodBoundaryAspect.
I found example mention in Postsharp site where example session as "http://samples.postsharp.net/#PostSharp.Samples.SessionState.
I found they are using LocationInterceptionAspect for sessionstate.
I tried all enable and disable session.But error still same as mention below.Please do need fulhelp.
Should i need to enhance our source code to handle LocationInterceptionAspect for session state ?
Error :
"Session state can only be used when enableSessionState is set to true, either in a configuration file or in the Page directive. Please also make sure that System.Web.SessionStateModule or a custom session state module is included in the \\ section in the application configuration."
Related
Given the following
Visual Studio 2015
An ASP.NET Web Application (.csproj project)
.NET 4.5.2
IIS Express is enabled to debug and run the site
Source control in TFS
When I enable the property Development Server > Windows Authentication, the setting cannot be persisted in source control.
Is there a way to configure this setting so that it is applied when retrieving the solution from Source Control?
Workaround: every developer has to enable this individually.
Note: this setting is stored in applicationhost.config
This setting is saved in .vs/config/applicationHost.config. Without checking this file to your source code control, the setting won't be shared. But of course, if you check it in, then all other settings (like bindings/ports) are also shared, and it might lead to other issues.
Mostly caused by IIS Express design, and have to get used to it.
I'm creating a lightswitch application. This is a web application which is supposed to be deployed on a IIS Server. I'm currently using the VS server.
I'm currently developping an userControl, it was working fine, I was only tunning it(margin, padding, ...), but now when I start it, I got this famous Asp.Net errors:
Runtime Error
Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current
custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the
application error from being viewed.
Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be
viewable on the local server machine, please create a
tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root
directory of the current web application. This tag
should then have its "mode" attribute set to "RemoteOnly". To enable
the details to be viewable on remote machines, please set "mode" to
"Off".
okay, for ASP.NET, I know how to change easily this property, but in a lightswitch application, we don't have access to this web.config.
So anybody knows how is it possibie to have a asp.net runtime error on a page which should only contains the launcher for the silverlight app? Or how to enable this error with a lightswitch application?
The answer is scaring me, but it seems that sometimes lightswitch is lost and I need to restart visual studio, and without changing anything, it works agains :'(
Is there any way to choose the Session State Mode to be "State Server" when using MSBuild Extension Pack? I browsed the source code but there is no reference to state management.
Also, if anyone knows how to do this with the Extension Pack WMI that would be great too. I tried all kinds of queries and methods but couldn't come up with a way of talking to IIS through WMI to set SessionStateSection.Mode property "StateServer" flag as stated in MSDN.
Thanks...!
My IT department and I are trying to get an ASP.NET web application to run on a Linux with Mono. We have been working on this for about a month to no avail. The Mono setup on the Linux server seems to be good. We are able to run the demo ASP.NET pages on the server and they work fine.
I developed my ASP.NET web application with Visual Studio 2008, and I recently downgraded the application to ASP.NET 2.0. Originally it was in ASP.NET 3.5, which might be the problem. After publishing the web app, I received the following files: Default.aspx, Web.config, bin (with a .dll and a .pdb file), and an empty App_Data file. So far, the error that keeps occuring is an appication error on the server.
For a simple test, I made a simple ASP.NET web app that had a label and a button. We tried that app and it did not work either. Does anyone know of things that I should look for within my ASP.NET web application that would inhibit the application to work?
Application error:
Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine.
Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be viewable on remote machines, please create a tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root directory of the current web application. this tag should then have its "mode" attribute set to "Off".
!--web.COnfig Configuration File--
configuration
system.web
customErros mode+"Off"/
/system.web
/configuration
Notes: The current error page you are seeing can be replaced by a custom error page by modifying the "defaultRedirect" attribute of the application's configuration tag to point to a custom error page URL.
!--Web.Config Configuration File--
configuration
system.web
customErrors mode="RemoteOnly" defaultRedirect="mycustompage.htm"/
/system.web
/configuration
Thank you,
DFM
Just for a resolution, I finally figured out what the problem was. The ASP.NET web app has an onload event that enables the web app to read an Access Db. For testing purposes, I did not update the ADO.NET Db path for the web app to read the Db so every time it was loaded through Mono, the generalized error in question would occur. After deleting the onload event, the web app functioned perfectly. Additionally, I had to downgrade the web app to ASP.NET 2.0, instead of 3.5, and delete the LINQ namespaces, which were not being used.
All I have to do is change the path(s) to point to the App_Data folder and place the Db in the folder, as well.
I have an application in an application pool that's running in integrated mode. I have added a handler to system.web > httpHandlers and I kept getting a 404 result. So I enabled failed request tracing and in the request details I see multiple entires like this:
HANDLER_PRECONDITION_NOT_MATCH
Name: PageHandlerFactory-ISAPI-2.0
Precondition classicMode,runtimeVersionv2.0,bitness32
The precondition always seems to be classicMode. Why is IIS 7 trying to match the request to these handlers when the application pool is running in integrated mode?
Thanks!
Your HttpHandler should actually be configured in the <system.webServer/> section of your web.config file.
I didn't find out why it was set in classicMode by default, but this blog explained the various preconditions very well: http://blogs.iis.net/thomad/archive/2006/11/04/precondition-what.aspx
Here is an excerpt from the blog regarding "The Mode Precondition":
The Mode Precondition
The new managed module and managed handler extensibility allows you to add managed code, i.e. ASP.NET pages, modules and handlers, directly into the IIS7 pipeline. IIS7 needs to run the worker process in a particular way for this to work. It needs to load the .NET Framework 2.0 and it also needs to run a module called webengine.dll. Webengine.dll does all the work of hooking up managed modules with the IIS7 pipeline because IIS7 itself doesn’t know about managed code. The new way to integrate ASP.NET pages, modules and handlers is called “Integrated Mode”.
But there is still the good old way to hook up managed code in IIS7, i.e. via the ISAPI interface. ASPNET_ISAPI.DLL used to do this in IIS 5, 5.1 and 6.0. IIS7 continues to support the ISAPI hookup if you run the worker process in “classic Mode”.
As a result IIS7 introduced two preconditions called “integratedMode” and “classicMode”. A handler that has an “integratedMode” precondition associated with it will only be loaded into an Application Pool that has the “integratedMode” property set on the ApplicationPool. Handlers with the “classicMode” precondition will only be loaded into Application Pools that have the integratedMode property set to false.