I've noticed more and more that my stylesheets generally have repeated rules as a normal selector as well as inside a #media ... {} query and generates quite a lot of CSS bloat.
Here's a simple use-case of the problem that I see popping up ad nauseam:
.big-red {
color:red;
font-size: 3em;
... lots of other stuff
}
.dynamic-uber-class {
color:green;
font-size:2em;
}
#media only screen and (min-width: 48em) {
.dynamic-uber-class {
color:red;
font-size: 3em;
... lots of other .big-red duplicated stuff
}
}
I notice that the problem becomes increasingly problematic when I use mixins in less or scss (because it's really easy to add), but what's really needed is mixins in CSS (for which I won't be holding my breath!). That said, I've noticed CSS-Properties, with some support and #apply that has no support.
Has anyone stumbled on a CSS only way of not having this duplication?
I'm aware that with a bit of Javascript I can simply add/remove classes, but I like my sites working properly with javascript disabled (as much as possible).
Edit:
For those struggling to understand the problem, take a real-world example from bootstrap's grid:
.col-xs-12 {
width: 100%;
}
.col-xs-11 {
width: 91.66666667%;
}
.col-xs-10 {
width: 83.33333333%;
}
...
#media (min-width: 768px) {
.col-sm-12 {
width: 100%;
}
.col-sm-11 {
width: 91.66666667%;
}
.col-sm-10 {
width: 83.33333333%;
}
}
If you've ever looked at the generated CSS of bootstrap it is very fat indeed due to the problem.
Why not something like this:
.uber-class, .dynamic-uber-class {
color:red;
font-size: 3em;
... lots of other duplicated stuff
}
#media only screen and (min-width: 48em) {
.dynamic-uber-class {
... only unique styles
}
}
Related
Intro
this is similar to this question but unfortunately the answer only applies to greasmonkey (which only works on firefox). Further, this was asked on the stylish forum but the answer was ambiguous.
Question
I want to remove the left column in the azure help page and
expand the main body to make it cover the widht of the screen.
The first part can easily be done by this
#sidebarContent {display:none}
How ever the second part must conver this
media (max-width: 1199.99999px)
to this
media (max-width: 100%)
But I have no idea how to do that using stylish.. ideas?
To override a media query you just need to load another media query - that also applies to your device - after it.
Well...you want a blunt media query that applies to everything. The best way is to use #media (min-width: 1px) since that includes all devices.
Now, put it all together - along with some other CSS cleanups like padding and margin removal and setting a new width for .mainContainer and you get this
#sidebar {
display: none;
}
#media (min-width: 1px) {
.mainContainer {
margin: 0 auto;
width: 100vw;
padding: 0;
}
body>.container {
padding: 0;
}
}
New code: (with different selector for width)
#sidebar {
display: none;
}
#media (min-width: 1px) {
.mainContainer { /*example styles*/
margin: 0 auto;
width: 100vw;
}
body>.container {
padding: 0;
}
body>.mainContainer>main {
max-width: 100vw!important;
}
}
You still have to adjust the padding to your preference as setting the padding to 0 breaks the design a little bit but this should be good starting point.
Before:
After:
I am trying to extend a simple class
.positionAbsolute {
position: absolute;
}
My issue here is that I can extend it like:
#something:extend(.positionAbsolute) {
something else
}
But from inside the media query itself, If i try from outside no rule is extended at all.
Is this the normal behaviour?, why is doing that?, In such case I will have to create like four equal classes to extend in each media query case, is there some workaround?
Thank you
I'm not sure I understand it right (it's always hard to guess w/o seeing an exact CSS output you need to achieve), but it looks like you need something like:
.positionAbsolute {
position: absolute;
}
#something:extend(.positionAbsolute) {
#media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) {
something: else;
}
}
The other way around is:
.positionAbsolute {
position: absolute;
}
#class-1,
#class-2 {
&:extend(.positionAbsolute);
}
#media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) {
#class-1 {
something: else;
}
#class-2 {
something-even: more else;
}
}
That way you will have to repeat selectors instead of media queries.
I was trying to do this, and was quite disappointed I couldn't put the extend within a media query. Fortunately I was able to use a mixin for what I wanted. This may work for some situations. I can't really tell what you're actually doing with your case.
.centerVertically()
{
content: '';
display: inline-block;
height: 100%;
vertical-align: middle;
margin-right: -0.25em;
border: 2px solid red;
.content
{
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: middle;
}
}
used in media query
#media screen and (min-width: #break_tablet)
{
/* doesn't work
&:before:extend(.centerVertically_wrapper){}
.content:extend(.centerVertically_child){}
*/
.centerVertically();
The best I came up with I turned into a GIST here. Basically, I created an externalized reference mixin for the query and imported all the possible contexts into it. LESS sees through the query when you are referencing a class to extend but it will export it.
Reference:
.narrow {
#media screen and (max-aspect-ratio: 1/1) {
#import "position";
#import "z";
}
}
Export:
#import (reference) "narrow";
.style-1:extend(.position .abs, .narrow .position .rel) {
}
.style-2:extend(.narrow .position .rel) {
}
.style-3:extend(.narrow .z .index-1) {
}
Most of the time, I use LESS variables with preset breakpoints for media queries like this:
#s-max : ~"screen and (max-width: 40em)";
#m-max : ~"screen and (max-width: 50em)";
#l-max : ~"screen and (max-width: 60em)";
USAGE
.some-class {
color: red;
#media #s-max {
color: blue;
}
}
But sometimes, I would like to be able to refer to an arbitrary breakpoint in my .less stylesheet without having to set a new preset value in my separate mixin file.
You can do this in SASS. The mixin looks like this:
#mixin bp-min($canvas) {
#media only screen and (min-width:$canvas) {#content;}
}
USAGE
#include bp-min(750px) {
//responsive styling for min-width of 750px
}
In LESS, I'm imagining the equivalent mixin would look something like this:
.bp-min(#min) {
#media only screen and (min-width:#min)...
}
The only problem is, the lack of the {#content} argument in LESS, which grabs the rest of the styling inputted by the developer. I love SASS, but I can't use it at work.
Does anyone know of a LESS-based solution to this problem?
It is now similar to SASS
As of 1.7.0 (2014-02-27) you can now use #rules in place of the sassy #content.
For example:
.breakpoint-small(#rules) {
#media screen and (min-width: 40em) { #rules(); }
}
ul {
width: 100%;
.breakpoint-small({
width: 50%;
});
}
outputs, as expected:
ul {
width: 100%;
#media screen and (min-width: 40em) {
width: 50%;
}
}
The differences being:
function takes #rules as an argument
additional parenthesis when invoking the function
'.' syntax as opposed to '#include'
This can be combined with an additional argument to provide syntax equivalent to a nice bit of sass:
.breakpoint(#size, #rules) {
#media screen and (min-width: #size) { #rules(); }
}
#large: 60em;
ul {
.breakpoint(#large, {
width: 50%;
});
}
edit: To be honest I prefer a way more simple approach in less:
#break-large: ~"screen and (min-width: 60em)";
ul {
#media #break-large {
width: 50%;
}
}
Source: I too use sass at home and less at work
Using Pattern Matching
I believe this achieves what you want:
LESS
/* generic caller */
.bp-min(#min) {
#media only screen and (min-width:#min) {
.bp-min(#min, set);
}
}
/* define them */
.bp-min(750px, set) {
test: (#min - 300px);
}
.bp-min(400px, set) {
test: (#min - 100px);
}
/* call them */
.bp-min(750px);
.bp-min(400px);
Output CSS
#media only screen and (min-width: 750px) {
test: 450px;
}
#media only screen and (min-width: 400px) {
test: 300px;
}
By defining a set pattern mixin for the various sizes, and then using that pattern within the generic .bp-min(#min) mixin, I believe we have the same abstraction in LESS that you have in SCSS, with slightly more code because I believe SCSS defines and calls in one #include statement, whereas here we need two.
(In addition to the prev. answer) Or something like this:
.bp-min(#canvas) {
#media only screen and
(min-width: #canvas) {.content}
}
// usage:
& { .bp-min(900px); .content() {
color: red;
}}
& { .bp-min(600px); .content() {
color: blue;
}}
// more usage examples:
.class-green {
.bp-min(450px); .content() {
color: green;
}}
& { .bp-min(300px); .content() {
.class-yellow {
color: yellow;
}
.class-aqua {
color: aqua;
}
}}
Replace .content with .- if you prefer shorter stuff.
In my case I needed my variables to reference other variables, so some of these solutions did not work. Here is what I went with.
#bp-xs: ~"screen and (max-width:"#screen-xs-max~")";
#bp-sm: ~"screen and (max-width:"#screen-sm-max~")";
#bp-md: ~"screen and (max-width:"#screen-md-max~")";
#bp-lg: ~"screen and (max-width:"#screen-lg-max~")";
and then use them like so
#media #bp-sm {
...
}
I'm trying to use CSS3 media queries to make a class that only appears when the width is greater than 400px and less than 900px. I know this is probably extremely simple and I am missing something obvious, but I can't figure it out. What I have come up with is the below code, appreciate any help.
#media (max-width:400px) and (min-width:900px) {
.class {
display: none;
}
}
You need to switch your values:
/* No less than 400px, no greater than 900px */
#media (min-width:400px) and (max-width:900px) {
.foo {
display:none;
}
}
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/xf6gA/ (using background color, so it's easier to confirm)
#Jonathan Sampson i think your solution is wrong if you use multiple #media.
You should use (min-width first):
#media screen and (min-width:400px) and (max-width:900px){
...
}
just wanted to leave my .scss example here, I think its kinda best practice, especially I think if you do customization its nice to set the width only once! It is not clever to apply it everywhere, you will increase the human factor exponentially.
Im looking forward for your feedback!
// Set your parameters
$widthSmall: 768px;
$widthMedium: 992px;
// Prepare your "function"
#mixin in-between {
#media (min-width:$widthSmall) and (max-width:$widthMedium) {
#content;
}
}
// Apply your "function"
main {
#include in-between {
//Do something between two media queries
padding-bottom: 20px;
}
}
.class {
display: none;
}
#media (min-width:400px) and (max-width:900px) {
.class {
display: block; /* just an example display property */
}
}
I'm working with Bootstrap and LESS on a responsive webpage design.
One of the reasons I have enjoyed LESS in the past is because it can keep all attributes for HTML elements together.
What I have below is some rules to define a .sponsors block, and then one rule that applies to an element inside that block when the viewport is >= 768px
I don't like how that one rule requires a lot of extra code, and how that rule is apart from the rest of the rules. It also feels wrong.
What is a better way to do this / organize this? Do I need to start out by breaking everything down into top level #media groups?
.sponsors
{
li
{
.thumbnail
{
padding-top:20px;
padding-bottom:15px;
img
{
display:block;
margin:0 auto;
}
}
}
}
#media (min-width: 768px)
{
.sponsors
{
li
{
.thumbnail
{
padding-bottom:0px!important;
}
}
}
}
It would be pretty sweet if there was something like:
.thumbnail
{
&[#mediaWidth >=768]
{
padding-bottom:0px!important;
}
}
I think you can nest media queries and LESS (>1.3.0) will 'bubble' them to the root of your stylesheet during compilation.
.sponsors
{
li
{
.thumbnail
{
padding-top:20px;
padding-bottom:15px;
#media (min-width: 768px) {
padding-bottom:0px!important;
}
img
{
display:block;
margin:0 auto;
}
}
}
}