Say, for example, I want to bind a key "ctrl+d" to duplicate current line in LightTable. For that, to emulate duplication of the current line, I want to run a series of actions like [:editor.select-line :editor.copy :editor.selection.clear :editor.new-line-indent :editor.line-start :editor.paste]
How do I achieve this?
Note: I am aware of the :editor.sublime.duplicateLine tag which duplicates the line, but this is just the example. In general, I want to map a shortcut to a sequence of tags/tasks.
http://lighttable.com/
Are you trying to bind the key? You seem to have most of it set. Just open up user.keymap (ctrl-space "user keymap") and add this:
[:editor "ctrl+d" :editor.select-line
:editor.copy
:editor.selection.clear
:editor.new-line-indent
:editor.line-start
:editor.paste]
There is no requirement that you put it on separate lines like that of course.
Or are you asking for something more complicated?
Related
I want to search for multiple codes appearing in a cell. There are so many codes that I'd like to write parts of the code in succeeding lines. For example, let's say I am looking for "^a11","^b12", "^c67$" or "^d13[[:blank:]]". I am using:
^a11|^b12|^c67$|^d13[[:blank:]]
This seems to work. Now, I tried:
^a11|^b12|
^c67$|^d13[[:blank:]]
That also seemed to work. However when I tried:
^a11|^b12|^c67$|
^d13[[:blank:]]
It did not count the last one.
Note that my code is wrapped into a function. So the above is an argument that I feed the function. I'm thinking that's the problem, but I still don't know why one truncation works while the other does not.
I realized the answer today. The problem is that since I am feeding the regex argument, it will count the next line in the succeeding code.
Thus, the code below was only "working" because ^c67$ is empty.
^a11|^b12|
^c67$|^d13[[:blank:]]
And the code below was not working because ^d13 is not empty but also this setup looks for (next line)^d13[[:blank:]] instead of just ^d13[[:blank:]]
^a11|^b12|^c67$|
^d13[[:blank:]]
So an inelegant fix is:
^a11|^b12|^c67$|
^nothinghere|^d13[[:blank:]]
This inserts a burner code that is empty which is affected by the line break.
One of the useful features of ess-mode (Emacs speaks statistics) is to automatically replace the underscore _ with the assignment operator <-. Lately, I have been using a lot of pipes (written as %>%) and it would be great to not have to type three characters for each pipe.
Is it possible to define a custom key binding for the pipe, similar to the one converting _ into ->?
The simplest solution is to just bind a key to insert a string:
(define-key ess-mode-map (kbd "|") "%>%")
You can still insert | with C-q |. I'm not sure about the map's name; you'll almost certainly want to limit the key binding to ess-mode.
Check out yasnippet. You can use it to define something like "if this sequence of characters is followed by this key (which you can define to whatever you like), then replace them with this other sequence of characters and leave the cursor in this place". There's more to yasnippet than this, but there's plenty of documentation online and even already made recipes similar to the example I gave above that you can try, like yasnippet-ess-mode, for example.
Alternatively, you can also try abbrev-mode and see if that works for you.
I, for one, like yasnippet better, since you can also specify where to leave the cursor after the expansion, but abbrev-mode seems to be easier to set up. As always in Emacs world, try multiple solutions, don't settle for the first one you put your hands on. What works best for others might not work for you, and vice-versa.
For example, I have many HTML tabs to style, they use different classes, and will have different backgrounds. Background images files have names corresponding to class names.
The way I found to do it is yank:
.tab.home {
background: ...home.jpg...
}
then paste, then :s/home/about.
This is to be repeated for a few times. I found that & can be used to repeat last substitute, but only for the same target string. What is the quickest way to repeat a substitute with different target string?
Alternatively, probably there are more efficient ways to do such a thing?
I had a quick play with some vim macro magic and came up with the following idea... I apologise for the length. I thought it best to explain the steps..
First, place the text block you want to repeat into a register (I picked register z), so with the cursor at the beginning of the .tab line I pressed "z3Y (select reg z and yank 3 lines).
Then I entered the series of VIM commands I wanted into the buffer as )"zp:.,%s/home/. (Just press i and type the commands)
This translate to;
) go the end of the current '{}' block,
"zp paste a copy of the text in register z,
.,%s/home/ which has two tricks.
The .,% ensures the substitution applies to everything from the start of the .tab to the end of the closing }, and,
The command is incomplete (ie, does not have a at the end), so vim will prompt me to complete the command.
Note that while %s/// will perform a substitution across every line of the file, it is important to realise that % is an alias for range 1,$. Using 1,% as a range, causes the % to be used as the 'jump to matching parenthesis' operator, resulting in a range from the current line to the end of the % match. (which in this example, is the closing brace in the block)
Then, after placing the cursor on the ) at the beginning of the line, I typed "qy$ which means yank all characters to the end of the line into register q.
This is important, because simply yanking the line with Y will include a carriage return in the register, and will cause the macro to fail.
I then executed the content of register q with #q and I was prompted to complete the s/home/ on the command line.
After typing the replacement text and pressing enter, the pasted block (from register z) appeared in the buffer with the substitutions already applied.
At this point you can repeat the last #qby simple typing ##. You don't even need to move the cursor down to the end of the block because the ) at the start of the macro does that for you.
This effectively reduces the process of yanking the original text, inserting it, and executing two manual replace commands into a simple ##.
You can safely delete the macro string from your edit buffer when done.
This is incredibly vim-ish, and might waste a bit of time getting it right, but it could save you even more when you do.
Vim macro's might be the trick you are looking for.
From the manual, I found :s//new-replacement. Seemed to be too much typing.
Looking for a better answer.
I have the data as below manner.
<Status>Active Leave Terminated</Status>
<date>05/06/2014 09/10/2014 01/10/2015</date>
I want to get the data as in the below manner.
<status>Active</Status>
<date>05/06/2014</date>
<status>Leave</Status>
<date>09/10/2014</date>
<status>Terminated</Status>
<date>01/10/2015</date>
please help me on the query, to retrieve the data as specified above.
Well, you have a string and want to split it at the whitestapces. That's what tokenize() is for and \s is a whitespace. To get the corresponding date you can get the current position in the for loop using at. Together it looks something like this (note that I assume that the input data is the current context item):
let $dates := tokenize(date, "\s+")
for $status at $pos in tokenize(Status, "\s+")
return (
<status>{$status}</status>,
<date>{$dates[$pos]}</date>
)
You did not indicate whether your data is on the file system or already loaded into MarkLogic. It's also not clear if this is something you need to do once on a small set of data or on an on-going basis with a lot of data.
If it's on the file system, you can transform it as it is being loaded. For instance, MarkLogic Content Pump can apply a transformation during load.
If you have already loaded the content and you want to transform it in place, you can use Corb2.
If you have a small amount of data, then you can just loop across it using Query Console.
Regardless of how you apply the transformation code, dirkk's answer shows how you need to change it. If you are updating content already in your database, you'll xdmp:node-delete() the original Status and date elements and xdmp:node-insert-child() the new ones.
Is it possible to get a list of declared variables with a VimL (aka VimScript) expression? I'd like to get the same set of values that will be presented for a command using -complete=expression. The goal is to augment that list for use in a user-defined command completion function.
You can use g: as a dictionary that holds all global variables, so:
let globals = keys(g:)
will give you all the names. The same applies to the other scopes: b:, s:, w:, etc. See :help internal-variables for the complete list.
You can get something similar using keys of g:, b:, t:, w: and v: dictionaries, but beware of the following facts:
There is no equivalent to this dictionaries if you want to complete options.
Some variables like count (but not g:count or l:count), b:changedtick and, maybe, others are not present in this dictionaries.
Some vim hacker may add key ### to dictionary g:, but it won't make expression g:### valid variable name (but adding 000 there will). Though g:["###"] will be a valid expression.