3D Box Shadow effect - css

So I know how to do a basic box shadow with CSS3. You can see that in the top of the graphic below.
The effect I'm trying to achieve is a 3D box shadow, as shown in the bottom of the graphic below.
Any ideas on how to do this with CSS3 box shadows?

Unfortunately box shadows are effectively just flat layers. However you can apply multiple box shadows to create this effect.
.box-shadow-3d{
box-shadow: 1px 1px 0px #999,
2px 2px 0px #999,
3px 3px 0px #999,
4px 4px 0px #999,
5px 5px 0px #999,
6px 6px 0px #999;
}

you can use pseudo element for as shadow
div {
background: black;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
position: relative;
}
div:after,
div:before {
content: '';
background: grey;
position: absolute;
}
div:after {
width: 100%;
height: 20px;
left: 10px;
bottom: 0;
transform: translatey(100%) skewx(45deg);
}
div:before {
width: 20px;
height: 100%;
right: 0;
transform: translatex(100%) skewy(45deg);
top: 10px;
}
<div></div>

Here is a real 3D shadow using perspective and pseudo-element :before.
body {
background: lightblue;
}
.foo {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
-webkit-perspective: 1000px;
-moz-perspective: 1000px;
persepctive: 1000px;
margin: 20px;
margin-top: 50px;
}
.foo .box {
transform: rotateY(-40deg);
height: 350px;
width: 250px;
background-color: black;
}
.foo:before {
content: "";
top: -15px;
position: absolute;
width: 50px;
height: 375px;
background-color: grey;
transform: translateX(215px) translateY(2.7px) rotateY(55deg)
}
<div class="foo">
<div class="box"></div>
</div>

You can stack the horizontal/vertical offsets of several box-shadows, each slightly bigger than the previous one. The more shadows you add, the more pronounced the effect. Here is a fiddle example.
div {
background: black;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
box-shadow: 0 01px gray,
01px 0 gray,
01px 02px gray,
02px 01px gray,
02px 03px gray,
03px 02px gray,
03px 04px gray,
04px 03px gray,
04px 05px gray,
05px 04px gray,
05px 06px gray,
06px 05px gray;
}

I had some problems with these two options, so I adapted some diagonal gradients from Lea Verou's excellent book CSS Secrets. I thought about creating a gradient inside a right and bottom border via border-image, but that property does not allow edge targeting, à la border-right-image, etc.
So, I settled on using a pseudo element with two truncated corners, which seems to work pretty well. You have to be careful to adjust the width of the gradient to be 1.414 the size of half the padding, since this would be the diagonal of a square (square root of two). Also, since that's a pseudo element, be careful of the right placement. Interested to hear what you folks think.
div {
background: #bbb;
padding: 1em 1.2em;
width: 50%;
margin: 0 auto;
color: #111;
font: 150%/1.2 Georgia, Palatino, Times, serif;
position: relative;
}
div:after {
content:" ";
position:absolute;
top:0;
left: 0;
width:100%;
height:100%;
padding: 1.42em; /* (square root of gradient position) */
background: #000; /* Fallback if not supported */
background: linear-gradient(-135deg, transparent 2em, #000 0) top right,
linear-gradient(#000, #000) padding-box bottom right,
linear-gradient(45deg, transparent 2em, #000 0) bottom left;
/*I have avoided adding -webkit-, -moz and -0 prefixs for linear-gradient. You may put them in later to be extra safe*/
background-size: 50% 50%; /* There is no reason to paint the upper left quadrant, so I didn't. */
background-repeat: no-repeat;
-webkit-box-sizing: content-box; -moz-box-sizing: content-box; box-sizing: content-box;
/* Many people use border-box as default these days. Unfortunately, the box cannot be sized using border-box settings with the combination of padding in ems and percentages. So this is reset to content-box, just in case. */
z-index: -1; /* To keep the shadow behind the div*/
<div>This is a short sentence to demonstrate that our little div is responsive.</div>

Here's a little implementation, inspired by #Vitorino fernandes, in stylus...
offset = 10
border = 3
.offsetbox
margin offset
padding offset
text-align center
box-shadow inset 0 0 0 unit(border,px) black
background white
display inline-block
position relative
&:after,
&:before
content ''
background black
position absolute
&:after
width 100%
height offset
transform translatey(100%) skewx(-45deg)
right (offset/2)
bottom 0
&:before
height 100%
width offset
transform: translatex(-100%) skewy(-45deg)
left 0
top (offset/2)

I added some clip paths to #Vittorino fernandes code, to avoid white space between pseudos and make it sharper.
I added some 1px adjustments to avoid bad svg rendering problems.
You can use the variable called shadow-dimension to set the shadow width and height.
I Put it on a codePen:
https://codepen.io/silviamalavasi/pen/XWqeWEq
:root {
--shadow-dimension: 20px;
--blue: #0039a6;
}
.box-container {
position: relative;
}
.box-container>div {
border: 2px solid var(--blue);
}
.box-container>div:after, .box-container>div:before {
content: '';
background-color: var(--blue);
position: absolute;
}
.box-container>div:before {
width: calc(var(--shadow-dimension) + 1px);
height: calc(100% + 100px + 1px);
left: calc(var(--shadow-dimension) * -1);
transform: skewy(-45deg);
top: calc(0.5*var(--shadow-dimension));
clip-path: polygon(0% 0%, 100% 0%, 100% calc(100% - 100px - 2px + var(--shadow-dimension)), 0% calc(100% - 100px - 2px));
}
.box-container>div:after {
width: calc(100% + 100px);
height: calc(var(--shadow-dimension) + 1px);
left: calc(-0.5*var(--shadow-dimension) - 100px);
bottom: 1px;
transform: translateY(100%) skewx(-45deg);
clip-path: polygon(100px 0%, 100% 0%, 100% 100%, calc(100px + 2px) 100%);
}

Related

CSS Styling Left and bottom border with angled tip

I'm trying to get some angle on the tip of a left and bottom border on a div or image. Can't seem to replicate this kind of style Desired Output
This is what I have come up so far. When using borders angle tips are pointing outwards though
Using box shadow
<div class="container">Text Content or Image</div>
.container {
background-color: blue;
padding: 100px;
box-shadow: -10px 20px 0px 5px #f71e1e;
}
Using border
.container {
background-color: blue;
padding: 100px;
border-bottom: 15px solid #f71e1e;
border-top: 15px solid white;
border-left: 15px solid #f71e1e;
border-right: 15px solid white;
}
https://jsfiddle.net/su8we1vq/
One approach is as follows, which does allow for easy changes to be made via CSS custom properties; the code is below with explanatory comments in the code:
/* CSS custom properties to handle the border's
color and size: */
:root {
--borderColor: #f00;
--borderSize: 10px;
}
/* simple reset to remove default margins and padding,
and also forcing browsers to use the same basis for
calculating element sizes: */
*,
::before,
::after {
/* includes any assigned padding and border-widths
in the declared size of the element: */
box-sizing: border-box;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
.container {
background-color: blue;
/* for no reason other than easily placing the contents of
the element to the vertical center and left (inline-start): */
display: grid;
place-content: center start;
block-size: 20vh;
/* allows for responsive sizing, the preferred size is 80vw
(80% of the viewport width), but with a minimum size of
20rem and a maximum size of 1200px: */
inline-size: clamp(20rem, 80vw, 1200px);
/* in romantic languages, derivatives of Italian (English,
German...) this is the top/bottom margin; we're using
logical properties in order that other languages might be
laid out appropriately for their own languages' inline and
block axes): */
margin-block: 20vh;
/* in romantic languages (as above) this is equivalent to
left/right margin: */
margin-inline: auto;
/* as above, but here we set padding on the inline-axis (left/right
in romantic languages and derivatives): */
padding-inline: 1em;
/* to allow absolute positioning for pseudo-elements: */
position: relative;
}
.container::before,
.container::after {
content: '';
background-color: var(--borderColor);
position: absolute;
transform-origin: right top;
}
.container::before {
/* taking the full size of the block axis of the parent: */
block-size: 100%;
/* sizing the inline axis to the desired size of the "border" */
inline-size: var(--borderSize);
top: 0;
right: 100%;
/* skewing the normal quadrilateral shape of an HTML element: */
transform: skewY(-45deg);
}
.container::after {
/* the size of the desired "border": */
block-size: var(--borderSize);
/* the full inline size of the parent: */
inline-size: 100%;
top: 100%;
left: 0;
transform: skewX(-45deg);
}
<!-- the original HTML: -->
<div class="container">Text Content or Image</div>
<!-- a second element, demonstrating the possible "theming": -->
<div class="container"
style="--borderColor: lightskyblue;
--borderSize: 2em;
background-color: palegreen;">Text Content or Image</div>
JS Fiddle.
It's worth noting though that there is a slight problem with this approach, where the two pseudo-elements meet, on the lower-left, there is a visible sliver of the background-color of whatever is behind the element.
The easiest way to achieve this would be by using multiple box-shadow, like this:
.container {
background-color: blue;
padding: 100px;
box-shadow: -1px 1px 0px #f71e1e,
-2px 2px 0px #f71e1e,
-3px 3px 0px #f71e1e,
-4px 4px 0px #f71e1e,
-5px 5px 0px #f71e1e,
-6px 6px 0px #f71e1e,
-7px 7px 0px #f71e1e,
-9px 9px 0px #f71e1e,
-10px 10px 0px #f71e1e;
}
Yeah, it doesn't look pretty syntax-wise but hey :(
clip-path with border can do it. I added a CSS variable to easily control the size of the shadow
.box {
--s: 10px; /* control the size of the shadow */
background-color: blue;
margin: 50px;
height: 100px;
border: solid #f71e1e; /* the color here */
border-width: 0 0 var(--s) var(--s);
clip-path: polygon(0 var(--s),var(--s) 0, 100% 0,100% 100%,100% calc(100% - var(--s)),calc(100% - var(--s)) 100%,0 100%);
}
<div class="box"></div>
Also with multiple background to have less code:
.box {
--s: 10px; /* control the size of the shadow */
margin: 50px;
height: 100px;
background:
linear-gradient(blue 0 0) calc(100% + var(--s)) calc(-1*var(--s)) no-repeat,
#f71e1e;
clip-path: polygon(0 var(--s),var(--s) 0, 100% 0,100% 100%,100% calc(100% - var(--s)),calc(100% - var(--s)) 100%,0 100%);
}
<div class="box"></div>

How do I use gradient image which gradates in both directions as border-image?

I want my <div> to have a bottom border which starts from a distance away from the left. It's like:
abc
^^^^^^^^^^
where ^ stands for a piece of border.
I achieved this using border-image. I set a border-image to a linear-gradient() image, which starts transparent, and becomes gray from some pixels.
<style>
div {
width: 200px;
border-top-style: none;
border-bottom-style: solid;
border-width: 1px;
border-image: linear-gradient(to right,
transparent 0,
transparent 1em,
lightgray 1em,
lightgray 100%) 100% 1;
}
</style>
<div>abc</div>
Now the new requirement is to add a 1px white line right below the existing line to mimic a 3d effect. I thought I could simply add a vertical gradient to the border image, but I don't know how to do it.
Instead of border consider multiple background. I used different colors to better see the result:
.box {
width: 200px;
background:
linear-gradient(blue, blue) 1em 100%/ 100% 1px no-repeat,
linear-gradient(red, red) 1em 100%/ 100% 2px no-repeat;
}
<div class="box">abc</div>
You can Achive it with box-shadow
If you are using display: flex to your div you should position pseudo after element using position: absoute
See this example:
body {
background-color: lightgreen;
}
div {
display: flex;
position: relative;
}
div:after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
display: block;
width: 200px;
height: 1px;
box-shadow: 10px 1px 0 0 lightgray, 10px 2px 0 0 white;
}
<div>abc</div>
<div>edf</div>

Using perspective and transform ruins my site at different resolutions

I'm trying to create a 3D responsive mockup for a sign with perspective and transform, but I'm having some difficulty.
This is what I'm trying to do:
It looks good but when I'm changing my screen size it looks terrible:
I really don't know how to make it responsive.
This is my code up to now:
#import url('https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Pacifico');
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
font-family: 'Pacifico', cursive;
}
.mockup {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
-webkit-transform-origin: 0 0;
transform-origin: 0 0;
-webkit-perspective: 500px;
perspective: 500px;
}
.mockup--background {
width: 100%;
}
.mockup--crop {
position: absolute;
top: 30%;
left: 14%;
width: 52%;
padding: 1.8% 0;
font-size: 3em;
text-align: center;
background: rgb(141,126,127);
color: #fff;
text-shadow: -1px 0px #bab1b2,
-2px 1px #bab1b2,
-3px 2px #bab1b2,
-5px 3px #bab1b2,
-5px 4px #bab1b2,
-6px 5px #bab1b2;
background: -moz-linear-gradient(45deg, rgba(141,126,127,1) 0%, rgba(169,160,165,1) 100%);
background: -webkit-linear-gradient(45deg, rgba(141,126,127,1) 0%,rgba(169,160,165,1) 100%);
background: linear-gradient(45deg, rgba(141,126,127,1) 0%,rgba(169,160,165,1) 100%);
filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient( startColorstr='#8d7e7f', endColorstr='#a9a0a5',GradientType=1 );
}
.perspective {
transform: rotateY(22deg) rotateX(6deg) skewY(22deg) skewX(-2deg);
}
<div class="mockup">
<img class="mockup--background" src="https://designshack.net/wp-content/uploads/screenshot_1-o-1024x681.png" />
<div class="mockup--crop perspective">
Mock Up
</div>
</div>
Fiddle demo
After a lot of fine-tuning, I think I've got it fit perfectly
Fiddle
The HTML now only consists of two elements
<div class="mockup">
<div class="mockup--crop">Mock Up</div>
</div>
I've removed the img tag because the image is clearly a background-image, so I figured it'd be semantically correct to move it to the CSS
.mockup{
position: relative;
perspective: 150vw;
padding-bottom: 66.5%;
background-image: url('https://designshack.net/wp-content/uploads/screenshot_1-o-1024x681.png');
background-size: 100% 100%;
}
.mockup--crop {
position: absolute;
top: 16.125%;
left: 17.5%;
width: 63.2%;
height: 28.8%;
background-image: linear-gradient(to bottom right, #8D7E7F 0%, #A9A0A5 100%);
text-align: center;
font-size: 10vw;
color: #FFF;
text-shadow: -.1vw .1vw #BAB1B2,-.2vw .2vw #BAB1B2,-.3vw .3vw #BAB1B2,-.4vw .4vw #BAB1B2,-.5vw .5vw #BAB1B2,-.6vw .6vw #BAB1B2,-.7vw .7vw #BAB1B2,-.8vw .8vw #BAB1B2,-.9vw .9vw #BAB1B2,-1vw 1vw #BAB1B2;
transform: rotateZ(18.7deg) rotateY(47.5deg) rotateX(32.9deg);
transform-origin: 0 0;
}
.mockup has a padding-bottom of 66.5%, which is the ratio of the image (100 / (1024 / 681)). It also has a perspective of 150vw. This is a value I've come to as I was tweaking the transforms etc.
I've moved .mockup--crop's upper left corner to the upper left corner of the sign in the background, and gave it perspective-origin: 0 0;, so that I could easily transform it with a fixed, correct point. The rest is self explanatory.
#noJavaScript

Rectangle with two cut edges

I'm not sure what is specific name for this shape but can I just called it "half Parallelogram" ? I want make this shape purely using CSS/CSS3. Any help? or tutorial?
You can do it using pseudo-elements like below. The approach is to cut out a triangle shape from the left-bottom and top-right of the box. This method can be used with either a solid color an image inside the shape as long as the body background is a solid color. When the body background is a non-solid color this approach will not work because the border hack needs a solid color background.
The advantage of this method is that it can support cuts of different angles at each side (like in the question where the hypotenuse of the triangular cut on either side are not parallel to each other).
div {
background: red;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
position: relative;
}
div:before {
position: absolute;
height: 0;
width: 0;
content: ' ';
border: 20px solid white;
border-color: transparent transparent white white;
border-width: 20px 0px 0px 15px;
left: 0;
top: 80px;
}
div:after {
position: absolute;
height: 0;
width: 0;
content: ' ';
border: 20px solid white;
border-color: white white transparent transparent;
left: 170px;
top: 0px;
}
.with-img {
background: url(http://lorempixel.com/100/100);
}
<div></div>
<br>
<div class="with-img"></div>
Sample 2: You can also achieve a similar effect using gradients. Just 1 gradient is enough to produce a cut of similar angle on both sides. If different angles are required then two gradients should be used. However the multiple gradient approach mentioned here will not work when the body background is a non-solid color.
div {
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
position: relative;
}
.with-single-gradient {
background: linear-gradient(45deg, transparent 5%, yellowgreen 5%, yellowgreen 90%, transparent 90.5%);
}
.with-single-gradient.image {
background: linear-gradient(45deg, white 5%, transparent 5%, transparent 90%, white 90.5%), url(http://lorempixel.com/100/100);
}
.with-multiple-gradient.image {
background: linear-gradient(45deg, transparent 0%, transparent 90%, white 90%), linear-gradient(60deg, white 10%, transparent 5%, transparent 100%), url(http://lorempixel.com/100/100);
}
<div class='with-single-gradient'></div>
<br>
<div class='with-single-gradient image'></div>
<br>
<div class='with-multiple-gradient image'></div>
Sample 3: This can also be created using SVG and is the best method yet. All that it requires is just a single path element which creates the required shape.
<svg viewBox='0 0 100 60' width='200px' height='120px'>
<path d='M0,0 80,0 100,16 100,60 10,60 0,54z' fill='yellowgreen' />
</svg>
Tested on Chrome v24, Firefox v19, Safari v5.1.7 (on Windows) and IE v10. They are older versions but should work in the latest versions also.
Note: IE versions less than 10 do not support gradients as mentioned in this SO thread.
there's no thing as straight radius, but here you have some tutorials. For weird shapes, you need to use a combination of shape and negative space, basically using figures with the same color of the background . The good news is you could use "transparent" as color, so you can "fake" this figures in an easy way. See tutorials Shapes of CSS or yuo can use a generator like CSS Shape Generator or CSS Shape Generator 2 but they will highly depend on your needs. Personally, I'd use a BG image and be a happy camper
to make this shape you have to use pseudo class.
and i hope it will help you
div { display: inline-block; margin: 20px; float: left; }
shape {
width: 208px;
height: 130px;
background: red;
position: relative; }
shape:before {
content: "";
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
border-bottom: 29px solid red;
border-right: 29px solid #fff;
width: 179px;
height: 0; }
shape:after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
border-top: 29px solid red;
border-left: 29px solid #fff;
width: 42px;
height: 0; }
demo
2 gradients and background-size can be used too :
div {
width: 1440px;
height: 590px;
background:
linear-gradient(45deg, transparent 80px, #FF0000 80px) left no-repeat,
linear-gradient(-135deg, transparent 160px, #FF0000 160px) top right no-repeat;
background-size: 50% 100%;
}
<div>
</div>
1 gradients and calc() can be used too :
div {
width: 1440px;
height: 590px;
background:
linear-gradient(45deg, transparent 80px, #FF0000 80px, #FF0000 calc( 100% - 160px), transparent calc( 100% - 160px) );
}
<div>
</div>
Related to duplicate question https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36932294/how-can-i-create-the-object-in-picture-below-using-css-border-radius :
div {
width:980px;
height:460px;
background:linear-gradient(140deg,transparent 200px, #FFCB05 200px) left no-repeat,
linear-gradient(-40deg,transparent 80px, #FFCB05 80px) top right no-repeat;
background-size:50% 100% ;
}
<div>
div shape
</div>
image
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/M48zP.png" />
For the second shape use this:
border-bottom-left-radius:50px;
border-top-right-radius:50px;
Check JSFiddle Demo
Edit:
Question is edited and second shape has been removed.
You can add an element with overflow: hidden;
skew transform the parent by desired angle. Unskew the pseudoelement by the negative of that angle.
Using this approach, you can also add images to background.
div {
height: 100px;
width: 220px;
overflow: hidden;
position: relative;
-webkit-transform: skewX(45deg);
-moz-transform: skewX(45deg);
transform: skewX(45deg);
}
div:before {
content: '';
position: absolute;
left: 10px;
height: 100px;
width: 200px;
background: red;
-webkit-transform: skewX(-45deg);
-moz-transform: skewX(-45deg);
transform: skewX(-45deg);
}
<div></div>
FIDDLE
FIDDLE (with image)

How can I show only corner borders?

I'm wondering if it's possible in CSS to make a border but only for corner. Something like this:
**** ****
* *
* *
CONTENT
* *
* *
**** ****
You can achieve that using multiple linear gradients as a background image.
div {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background:
linear-gradient(to right, black 4px, transparent 4px) 0 0,
linear-gradient(to right, black 4px, transparent 4px) 0 100%,
linear-gradient(to left, black 4px, transparent 4px) 100% 0,
linear-gradient(to left, black 4px, transparent 4px) 100% 100%,
linear-gradient(to bottom, black 4px, transparent 4px) 0 0,
linear-gradient(to bottom, black 4px, transparent 4px) 100% 0,
linear-gradient(to top, black 4px, transparent 4px) 0 100%,
linear-gradient(to top, black 4px, transparent 4px) 100% 100%;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: 20px 20px;
}
<div></div>
Assuming <div id="content">CONTENT</div> and that CONTENT includes at least one HTML node.
#content {position:relative}
#content:before, #content:after, #content>:first-child:before, #content>:first-child:after {
position:absolute; content:' ';
width:80px; height: 80px;
border-color:red; /* or whatever colour */
border-style:solid; /* or whatever style */
}
#content:before {top:0;left:0;border-width: 1px 0 0 1px}
#content:after {top:0;right:0;border-width: 1px 1px 0 0}
#content>:first-child:before {bottom:0;right:0;border-width: 0 1px 1px 0}
#content>:first-child:after {bottom:0;left:0;border-width: 0 0 1px 1px}
Here's a Fiddle
I would use overlapping divs.
One with square corners.
And the Other with rounded corner (so it doesn't hide the corners of the first one).
#div1 {
position:absolute;
top:9px;
left:9px;
height:100px;
width:100px;
background-color:white;
border:1px solid black;
}
#div2 {
position:relative;
top:-1px;
left:-1px;
height:102px;
width:102px;
background-color:white;
border-radius: 15px;
}
<div id="div1" />
<div id="div2" />
Result:
An enhanced solution provided by #web-tiki:
http://jsfiddle.net/webtiki/y3EfP/147/
Here is an idea using gradient and CSS variables where you can easily control the shape of your border:
.box {
--b: 5px; /* thickness of the border */
--c: red; /* color of the border */
--w: 20px; /* width of border */
border: var(--b) solid #0000; /* space for the border */
--_g: #0000 90deg,var(--c) 0;
--_p: var(--w) var(--w) border-box no-repeat;
background:
conic-gradient(from 90deg at top var(--b) left var(--b),var(--_g)) 0 0 / var(--_p),
conic-gradient(from 180deg at top var(--b) right var(--b),var(--_g)) 100% 0 / var(--_p),
conic-gradient(from 0deg at bottom var(--b) left var(--b),var(--_g)) 0 100% / var(--_p),
conic-gradient(from -90deg at bottom var(--b) right var(--b),var(--_g)) 100% 100% / var(--_p);
/*Irrelevant code*/
width:200px;
height:100px;
box-sizing:border-box;
margin:5px;
display:inline-flex;
font-size:30px;
justify-content:center;
align-items:center;
text-align:center;
}
<div class="box">
some content
</div>
<div class="box" style="--c:blue;--w:40px;--b:2px">
some content
</div>
<div class="box" style="--c:green;--w:30%;--b:8px">
some content
</div>
<div class="box" style="--c:black;--w:50%;--b:3px">
some content
</div>
<div class="box" style="--c:purple;--w:10px;--b:10px">
some content
</div>
<div class="box" style="--c:orange;--w:calc(50% - 10px);--b:4px">
some content
</div>
You can also have a complex coloration if you combine this with mask:
.box {
--b: 5px; /* thickness of the border */
--c: red; /* color of the border */
--w: 20px; /* width of border */
padding: var(--b); /* space for the border */
position:relative;
/*Irrelevant code*/
width:200px;
height:100px;
box-sizing:border-box;
margin:5px;
display:inline-flex;
font-size:30px;
justify-content:center;
align-items:center;
text-align:center;
}
.box::before {
content :"";
position: absolute;
inset: 0;
background: var(--c,red);
--_g: #0000 90deg,#000 0;
--_p: var(--w) var(--w) no-repeat;
--mask:
conic-gradient(from 90deg at top var(--b) left var(--b),var(--_g)) 0 0 / var(--_p),
conic-gradient(from 180deg at top var(--b) right var(--b),var(--_g)) 100% 0 / var(--_p),
conic-gradient(from 0deg at bottom var(--b) left var(--b),var(--_g)) 0 100% / var(--_p),
conic-gradient(from -90deg at bottom var(--b) right var(--b),var(--_g)) 100% 100% / var(--_p);
-webkit-mask: var(--mask);
mask: var(--mask);
}
<div class="box">
some content
</div>
<div class="box" style="--c:repeating-linear-gradient(45deg,red,blue);--w:40px;--b:2px">
some content
</div>
<div class="box" style="--c:repeating-linear-gradient(90deg,#000 0 5px,transparent 5px 10px);--w:30%;--b:8px">
some content
</div>
<div class="box" style="--c:conic-gradient(red,green,yellow);--w:50%;--b:3px">
some content
</div>
<div class="box" style="--c:purple;--w:10px;--b:10px">
some content
</div>
<div class="box" style="--c:repeating-linear-gradient(45deg,orange 0 5px,blue 5px 10px);--w:calc(50% - 10px);--b:4px">
some content
</div>
And why not with radius:
.box {
--b: 5px; /* thickness of the border */
--c: red; /* color of the border */
--w: 20px; /* width of border */
--r: 25px; /* radius */
padding: var(--b); /* space for the border */
position:relative;
/*Irrelevant code*/
width:200px;
height:100px;
box-sizing:border-box;
margin:5px;
display:inline-flex;
font-size:30px;
justify-content:center;
align-items:center;
text-align:center;
}
.box::before {
content: "";
position: absolute;
inset: 0;
background: var(--c,red);
padding: var(--b);
border-radius: var(--r);
-webkit-mask:
linear-gradient( 0deg,#000 calc(2*var(--b)),#0000 0) 50% var(--b)/calc(100% - 2*var(--w)) 100% repeat-y,
linear-gradient(-90deg,#000 calc(2*var(--b)),#0000 0) var(--b) 50%/100% calc(100% - 2*var(--w)) repeat-x,
linear-gradient(#000 0 0) content-box,
linear-gradient(#000 0 0);
-webkit-mask-composite: destination-out;
mask-composite: exclude;
}
<div class="box">
some content
</div>
<div class="box" style="--c:repeating-linear-gradient(45deg,red,blue);--w:40px;--b:2px;--r:40px;">
some content
</div>
<div class="box" style="--c:repeating-linear-gradient(90deg,#000 0 5px,transparent 5px 10px);--w:30%;--b:8px">
some content
</div>
<div class="box" style="--c:conic-gradient(red,green,yellow);--w:50%;--b:3px">
some content
</div>
<div class="box" style="--c:purple;--w:10px;--b:10px;--r:0px">
some content
</div>
<div class="box" style="--c:repeating-linear-gradient(45deg,orange 0 5px,blue 5px 10px);--w:calc(50% - 10px);--b:4px;--r:10px">
some content
</div>
SVG
This is another great alternative if you now want to start using vectors to allow for great responsiveness.
<svg viewBox="0 0 100 100" width="50px">
<path d="M25,2 L2,2 L2,25" fill="none" stroke="black" stroke-width="3" />
<path d="M2,75 L2,98 L25,98" fill="none" stroke="black" stroke-width="3" />
<path d="M75,98 L98,98 L98,75" fill="none" stroke="black" stroke-width="3" />
<path d="M98,25 L98,2 L75,2" fill="none" stroke="black" stroke-width="3" />
</svg>
SVG is a great tool to use. Some of the advantages of using SVG in this case are:
Curve control
Fill control (opacity, color)
Stroke control (width, opacity, color)
Amount of code
Time to build and maintain the shape
Scalable
No HTTP request (if used inline like in the example)
Browser support for inline SVG goes back to Internet Explorer 9. See canIuse for more information.
You could absolutely position four <div>s, one in each corner, each with the appropriate two borders.
.corners {
position: relative;
width: 50px; /* for demo purposes */
padding: 10px;
}
.top, .bottom {
position: absolute;
width: 20px;
height: 20px;
pointer-events: none;
}
.top {
top: 0;
border-top: 1px solid;
}
.bottom {
bottom: 0;
border-bottom: 1px solid;
}
.left {
left: 0;
border-left: 1px solid;
}
.right {
right: 0;
border-right: 1px solid;
}
<div class="corners">
<div class="top left"></div>
<div class="top right"></div>
<div class="bottom right"></div>
<div class="bottom left"></div>
content goes here
</div>
Here are a couple of methods to create this effect without using any extra pseudo/real elements. One thing to note is that both these approaches would work only in modern browsers because they use CSS3 properties.
Using border-image: The border-image property makes it pretty easy to create such effects. The approach is as follows:
Create a transparent image which has borders just in the corner like here.
Set this image as the border-image-source and let the browser take care of the rest :) Since the default value for border-image-repeat is stretch, the browser would stretch the original image to fit the container even if the container becomes large.
The value set for the border-image-width property determines how thick the borders are.
.bordered {
background-color: beige;
border-image-source: url("http://i.stack.imgur.com/s2CAw.png");
border-image-slice: 1;
border-image-width: 5px;
}
.square {
height: 150px;
width: 150px;
}
.large-square {
height: 350px;
width: 350px;
}
/* Just for demo */
div {
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
<div class='bordered square'></div>
<div class='bordered large-square'></div>
Advantages:
Needs no extra elements (pseudo or real) which means less cluttered markup, pseudo elements can be used for other needs.
Is reasonably responsive. That is browser will adapt the borders even if container's dimensions change.
Drawbacks:
Relatively lower browser support. If IE10- support is needed then this is a no-go.
Since the border image is getting stretched, if the original image's canvas is a square and the container is a rectangle then the borders would look wider at top and bottom than left and right.
.bordered {
background-color: beige;
border-image-source: url("http://i.stack.imgur.com/s2CAw.png");
border-image-slice: 2;
border-image-width: 5px;
}
.small-square {
height: 75px;
width: 75px;
}
.square {
height: 150px;
width: 150px;
}
.large-square {
height: 350px;
width: 350px;
}
.rectangle {
height: 150px;
width: 250px;
}
.large-rectangle {
height: 150px;
width: 350px;
}
/* Just for demo */
div {
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
<div class='bordered small-square'></div>
<div class='bordered square'></div>
<div class='bordered large-square'></div>
<div class='bordered rectangle'></div>
<div class='bordered large-rectangle'></div>
Using background-image: The background-image property can also be used with linear-gradient images to produce the effect. The approach is as follows:
Create four linear-gradient images (two for top, bottom and two for left, right). These gradients would start with required color and continue to be that color for as many pixels as the width/height of the border image. After that it should be transparent.
For top and bottom borders, gradient's direction should be to right. For left and right borders, it should be to bottom.
The background-size value determines the thickness of the border. For top and bottom borders, the size of the gradient image would be 100% in X-axis and 5px (thickness) in Y-axis. For left and right borders, the size would 5px (thickness) in X-axis and 100% in Y-axis.
The background-repeat should be set to repeat-x for the top, bottom borders and to repeat-y for left and right borders.
The background-position is set to (-1 * half the size of the color in gradient) in the X or Y-axis as appropriate. This is to make half of the colored area appear on one side of the element while the other half appears on the other side (because gradient is repeating).
.bordered.square {
height: 150px;
width: 150px;
}
.bordered.rectangle {
height: 150px;
width: 250px;
}
.bordered {
background-color: beige;
background-image: linear-gradient(to right, black 30px, transparent 30px), linear-gradient(to right, black 30px, transparent 30px), linear-gradient(to bottom, black 30px, transparent 30px), linear-gradient(to bottom, black 30px, transparent 30px);
background-size: 100% 5px, 100% 5px, 5px 100%, 5px 100%;
background-position: -15px 0%, -15px 100%, 0% -15px, 100% -15px;
background-repeat: repeat-x, repeat-x, repeat-y, repeat-y;
}
/* Just for demo */
div {
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
<div class='bordered square'></div>
<div class='bordered rectangle'></div>
Advantages:
Needs no extra elements (pseudo or real) which means less cluttered markup, pseudo elements can be used for other needs.
Is reasonably responsive as the width of the color in gradient is fixed. If the width of the borders dashes need to change according to the container's dimensions then we can change the pixels value in gradient to percentage (with a few more minor changes) like in below snippet.
.bordered.square {
height: 150px;
width: 150px;
}
.bordered.large-square {
height: 250px;
width: 250px;
}
.bordered {
background-color: beige;
background-image: linear-gradient(to right, black 10%, transparent 10%), linear-gradient(to right, black 10%, transparent 10%), linear-gradient(to bottom, black 10%, transparent 10%), linear-gradient(to bottom, black 10%, transparent 10%);
background-size: 90% 5px, 90% 5px, 5px 90%, 5px 90%;
background-position: 0% 0%, 0% 100%, 0% 0%, 100% 0%;
background-repeat: repeat-x, repeat-x, repeat-y, repeat-y;
}
/* Just for demo */
div {
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
<div class='bordered square'></div>
<div class='bordered large-square'></div>
Drawbacks:
Relatively better browser support. If IE9- support is needed then this is a no-go.
If percentage based gradient is used then the same drawback with rectangles as mentioned for border-image would be applicable here also.
clip-path
Using two div's on top of each other.
And adding a clip-path to div that is in the back you can create a border like effect.
.wrapper {
display: inline-block;
background-color: black;
line-height: 0px;
-webkit-clip-path: polygon(0% 100%, 30% 100%, 30% 70%, 70% 70%, 70% 100%, 100% 100%, 100% 70%, 70% 70%, 70% 30%, 100% 30%, 100% 0%, 70% 0%, 70% 30%, 30% 30%, 30% 0%, 0% 0%, 0% 30%, 30% 30%, 30% 70%, 0% 70%);
clip-path: polygon(0% 100%,
30% 100%,
30% 70%,
70% 70%,
70% 100%,
100% 100%,
100% 70%,
70% 70%,
70% 30%,
100% 30%,
100% 0%,
70% 0%,
70% 30%,
30% 30%,
30% 0%,
0% 0%,
0% 30%,
30% 30%,
30% 70%,
0% 70%);
}
.wrapper {} .wrapper div {
display: inline-block;
height: 150px;
width: 150px;
margin: 10px;
background-color: white;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div></div>
</div>
two pseudo elements
Using two large pseudo elements you can create the border effect.
.cut-border {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
border: 5px solid black;
width: 150px;
height: 150px;
}
.cut-border::before {
content: "";
position: absolute;
height: calc(100% + 10px);
width: 50%;
background-color: white;
top: -5px;
left: 25%;
}
.cut-border::after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
height: 50%;
width: calc(100% + 10px);
background-color: white;
top: 25%;
left: -5px;
}
<div class="cut-border"></div>
An option that no one has mentioned so far is using multiple box-shadow to simulate that type of border. You would need one box-shadow for each corner:
div {
width: 150px;
height: 150px;
padding: 10px;
box-shadow:
-80px -80px 0 -70px black,
80px -80px 0 -70px black,
-80px 80px 0 -70px black,
80px 80px 0 -70px black;
}
<div>I am a box with borders only in the corners.</div>
It works by having four shadows (top-left, top-right, bottom-right, bottom-left) and reducing their size with a negative spread-radius (blur-radius will remain as zero):
box-shadow: offset-x offset-y [blur-radius] [spread-radius] [color];
While this is will work (even on IE!) and it is a simple method (no need for additional elements or pseudo-elements), it has two big shortfalls:
You need to know the size of the box to adjust the values of the box-shadow accordingly (or at least have a general idea to adjust the values of the shadows, because they don't accept percentages).
The corners will not be exactly squared. Instead, they will be proportional to the box size. This could be avoided by using 8 shadows instead of 4, but things get messy then.
In the end, using background gradients may be a better option and provides "more control" because it is all within the box. It could be achieved just with 4 linear-gradients (some answers indicate 8):
div {
--size: 32px;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
padding: 10px;
background:
linear-gradient(blue var(--size), transparent 0 calc(100% - var(--size)), blue 0) 0 0 / 4px 100%,
linear-gradient(blue var(--size), transparent 0 calc(100% - var(--size)), blue 0) 100% 0 / 4px 100%,
linear-gradient(to right, blue var(--size), transparent 0 calc(100% - var(--size)), blue 0) 0 0 / 100% 4px,
linear-gradient(to right, blue var(--size), transparent 0 calc(100% - var(--size)), blue 0) 0 100% / 100% 4px
;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
<div>I am a box with borders only in the corners.</div>
I found this question, but I was not satisfied with the border-radius approach: As I was using more thick borders, the effect was not as good as I wanted to. I managed to create another solution, without images, and without any extra markup:
.box {
/* fake border */
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
box-shadow: inset 0px 0px 0px 10px green;
padding: 1em;
}
.box:before {
/* this element will hide the fake border on the top and bottom */
content:'';
display: block;
position: absolute;
border-top:10px solid white;
border-bottom:10px solid white;
/* height = border-width x2 */
height:calc(100% - 20px);
top:0;
/* width = size of fake-border x2 */
width: calc(100% - 36px);
/* left = size of fake-border */
left:18px;
}
.box:after {
/* this element will hide the fake border on the left and right */
/* the rules for width, heigth, top and left will be the opposite of the former element */
display: block;
position: absolute;
content:'';
border-right:10px solid white;
border-left:10px solid white;
height:calc(100% - 36px);
width: calc(100% - 20px);
top:18px;
left: 0;
}
Here's a JSFiddle with this example: https://jsfiddle.net/t6dbmq3e/
Hope it helps.
Here is something that i did recently with content centred both vertically and horizontally.
The HTML
<div class="column">
<div class="c-frame-wrapper">
<div class="c-frame-tl"></div>
<div class="c-frame-tr"></div>
<div class="c-frame-br"></div>
<div class="c-frame-bl"></div>
<div class="c-frame-content">
© Copyright 2015 - Company name<br /><br />
St Winifrids St,<br />
The Saints, Harrogate HG1 5PZ, UK<br />
</div>
</div>
</div>
The CSS
.c-frame-wrapper {
width: 250px;
height: 100px;
font-size:11px;
color: $dark-grey-lighten-70;
/* center align x axis */
right: auto;
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
}
.c-frame-tl {
top: 0;
left: 0;
position: absolute;
width:10px;
height:10px;
border-width: 3px;
border-style: solid none none solid;
border-color: #eb0000;
}
.c-frame-tr {
top: 0;
right: 0;
position: absolute;
width:10px;
height:10px;
border-width: 3px;
border-style: solid solid none none;
border-color: #eb0000;
}
.c-frame-br {
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
position: absolute;
width:10px;
height:10px;
border-width: 3px;
border-style: none solid solid none;
border-color: #eb0000;
}
.c-frame-bl {
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
position: absolute;
width:10px;
height:10px;
border-width: 3px;
border-style: none none solid solid;
border-color: #eb0000;
}
.c-frame-content {
width:100%;
text-align: center;
/*center alignment x and y*/
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
bottom: auto;
right: auto;
transform: translate(-50%,-50%);
}
JSFiddle
i think the best solution is the pseudo element method. Nice and clean and doesn't pollute the html with (too many) extra elements.
I created this sass mixin using the code above, for a copy&paste solution:
#mixin corner-borders($corner-width: 1px, $corner-size: 5px, $color-border: grey, $color-background: white) {
position: relative;
border: $corner-width solid $color-border;
background-color: $color-background;
&::before {
content: "";
z-index: 0;
position: absolute;
top: -$corner-width;
bottom: -$corner-width;
left: $corner-size;
right: $corner-size;
background-color: $color-background;
}
&::after {
content: "";
z-index: 0;
position: absolute;
top: $corner-size;
bottom: $corner-size;
left: -$corner-width;
right: -$corner-width;
background-color: $color-background;
}
}
Then you can use it like this:
html:
<div class="border">
<div class="content">
Content
</div>
</div>
SCSS
.border {
#include corner-borders;
}
.content {
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
}
You need the z-index & relative position in there so the content sits on top of the pseudo elements.
I made a codepen demo here: http://codepen.io/timrross/pen/XMwVbV
I took Majid Laissi's answer and modified to be more understandable, simple and easy to modify.
img{
width:70px;
height:70px;
position:absolute;
top:50%;
left:50%;
transform:translate(-50%,-50%);
}
.custom-corners {
position: relative;
width: 150px;
height: 150px;
background-color: white;
border: 1px solid black;
}
.custom-corners:before {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: -1px;
left: -1px;
border: 1px solid #fff;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
border-radius: 10%;
}
.custom-corners:after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
bottom: -1px;
right: -1px;
border: 1px solid #fff;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
border-radius: 10%;
}
<div class="custom-corners">
<img src="https://cdn.logo.com/hotlink-ok/logo-social-sq.png" alt="">
</div>
Ok as i suck in CSS i think i'll not be able to do it myself but i do that and it seems work :
<div id="half" style="position:absolute; top:0; left:0; width:30px; height:30px; overflow:visible; border-top:3px solid #F00; border-left:3px solid #06F;"></div>
<div id="half" style="position:absolute; bottom:0; right:0; width:30px; height:30px; overflow:visible; border-bottom:3px solid #F00; border-right:3px solid #06F;"></div>
And it seems to be working ;-) Sorry for disturb and thanks for your help.
There is no clean css way to just give the corners a border, but you could try to mimic the effect. Something like this perhaps: http://jsfiddle.net/RLG4z/
<div id="corners">
<div id="content">
content
</div>
</div>
#corners {
width: 200px;
height: 50px;
border-radius: 10px;
background-color: red;
margin: 10px;
}
#content {
background-color: white;
border-radius: 15px;
height: 30px;
padding: 10px;
}
due to the difference in border radius, the background color of the underlying div shows trough, giving the effect of a border on the corners.
Personally I think i would work with background images to achieve this, for better controle of the result.
This is your picture:
HTML:
<div class="shell">
<div class="top">
<div class="clear">
<div class="left">
****
</div>
<div class="right">
****
</div>
</div>
<div class="clear">
<div class="left">
*
</div>
<div class="right">
*
</div>
</div>
<div class="clear">
<div class="left">
*
</div>
<div class="right">
*
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="content">
<p>CONTENT</p>
</div>
<div class="bottom">
<div class="clear">
<div class="left">
*
</div>
<div class="right">
*
</div>
</div>
<div class="clear">
<div class="left">
*
</div>
<div class="right">
*
</div>
</div>
<div class="clear">
<div class="left">
****
</div>
<div class="right">
****
</div>
</div>
</div>
and CSS:
.shell { width: 200px;}
.left{ float:left; }
.right{float:right; }
.clear { clear: both; line-height: 10px; }
.content { line-height: 10px; text-align: center; }
Here is a modified version of the above answer, this version has relative positioned parent and absolute positioned child so we can add the on hover effect.
http://jsfiddle.net/3jo5btxd/
HTML:
<div id="div1"><div id="div2"><img src="http://placekitten.com/g/82/82"></div></div>
CSS:
#div1 {
position: relative;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
background-color: white;
border: 1px solid transparent;
}
#div2 {
position: absolute;
top: -2px;
left: -2px;
height: 84px;
width: 84px;
background-color: #FFF;
border-radius: 15px;
padding: 10px;
}
#div1:hover {
border: 1px solid red;
}
I liked #Tims approach, but it forced me to set a background color to the box, which I did not want, since I it to put the focus on a background image object.
In my case I only needed 2 edges also, which makes it possible to structure it a little different.
I therefore structured it a little different, that makes it more flexible and still works in every browser.
The solution does not work if you need 4 corners, but just wanted to leave it here for future searchers.
:root {
--border-width: 5px;
--corner-size: 20px;
--border-color: red;
}
.box-corners {
position:relative;
}
.box-corners::before,
.box-corners::after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
width:var(--corner-size);
height:var(--corner-size);
border:var(--border-width) solid var(--border-color);
}
.box-corners::before {
left: 0;
top: 0;
border-bottom:none;
border-right:none;
}
.box-corners::after {
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
border-left:none;
border-top:none;
}
/* ############## THIS IS JUST OPTIONAL FOR THE HOVER EFFECT ############# */
.box-corners {
transition:background-color 0.3s ease-in-out;
}
.box-corners:hover {
background:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5)!important;
}
.box-corners::before,
.box-corners::after {
box-sizing:border-box;
transition:width 0.3s ease-in-out, height 0.3s ease-in-out;
}
.box-corners:hover::before,
.box-corners:hover::after {
width:100%;
height:100%;
}
<div class="box-corners" style="width:300px;height:300px;background:#f7f7f7;" />
Hover effect
You only need the first part of the css code to make the edges work.
The second part just allows to easily add a nice hover effect, that you could also just remove, if you don't need it.
Without CSS Variables and Sass
If you don't want to use css variables, you can just replace the variables with hardcoded values.
If you want to make a sass mixin out of it, just wrap it in a #mixin call and replace the vars with sass variables.
.border_coners {
background:
linear-gradient(to right, #e5e5e5 1px, transparent 1px) 0 0,
linear-gradient(to right, #e5e5e5 1px, transparent 1px) 0 100%,
linear-gradient(to left, #e5e5e5 1px, transparent 1px) 100% 0,
linear-gradient(to left, #e5e5e5 1px, transparent 1px) 100% 100%,
linear-gradient(to bottom, #e5e5e5 1px, transparent 1px) 0 0,
linear-gradient(to bottom, #e5e5e5 1px, transparent 1px) 100% 0,
linear-gradient(to top, #e5e5e5 1px, transparent 1px) 0 100%,
linear-gradient(to top, #e5e5e5 1px, transparent 1px) 100% 100%;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: 50px 50px;
}
I adapted the border radius approach, but I didn't want to use absolute positioning or have to know the size of the content.
Fortunately setting a negative margin in all directions provides everything we need:
.corner-borders {
border: 1px solid #ccc;
}
.corner-borders-reveal {
border-radius: 20%; /* or any other size */
border: 1px solid white;
margin: -1px;
padding: 4px;
}

Resources