CSS Layout filling the rest of the horizontal space - css

I'm trying to achieve a specific css layout. I tried a lot of possibilities including floats, and css tables but i just can't figure it out. CSS tables helped me a lot in the past when there are some fixed columns and some columns that should take the rest of the space but this one seems to be different.
I need to have two columns. Toghether they need to be 100% width of their parent. The right column should be as wide as its content (i.e. it's got 3 buttons in it it should be as wide as these three buttons). The left column should take the rest of the remaining space. Thats it. Sounds easy. In TeX world it is called "\hfill" i would love to have such a command in css.
Here's what i tried so far:
<section>
<div id="a"></div>
<div id="b">
<button>Bla</button>
<button>Test</button>
<button>Hello</button>
<button>World</button>
</div>
</section>
CSS:
section { display: table; width: 100%;}
div { display: table-cell; height: 100px; border: 1px solid #000;}
#a { width: 100% }
#b{ }
And a fiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/fa9FJ/270/
actually this is quite close to what i want, but the buttons need to be next to each other horizontally.

What you need is
#b {
white-space: nowrap;
}
Demo
This will prevent the buttons to wrap inside the div element

Try this..it works
button
{
width: 96%;
}

#b { display: table; }
button { display: table-cell; }
this should do the trick :)

Related

Collapsing whitespace automatically

I have a really simple example which I've written on JSBin. It looks like this:
All I'd like to do is simply take two divs of a given width and height and display them side-by-side without a gap between them. I've used display: inline-block to accomplish the above, but it seems like it refuses to chomp the whitespace between divs, which seems to completely violate the idea of the separation of content and styling.
Here's my HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="a">
<!-- completely empty -->
</div>
<div class="b">
<!-- nothing at all -->
</div>
</div>
and here's my CSS:
.container {
display: inline-block;
}
.a {
width: 320px;
height: 240px;
display: inline-block;
background-color: #83C5D1;
}
.b {
width: 180px;
height: 240px;
display: inline-block;
background-color: #B2D9D6;
}
How can I work around this to get them snug together without touching my HTML?
Add float:left to both of the divs classes .a and .b
I upated your JSBin http://jsbin.com/iwihox/4/edit
You're using a tabular design. Go for broke!
.container {
display: table-row;
}
.container > * {
display: table-cell;
}
Edit: Firefox did not like the inline-block children.
QUICK FIX
All given answers are good solutions, however the main reason for the gap is that there is white-space characters in your actual HTML that gets rendered. If you remove the space between both divs:
..</div><div>..
That will fix your current problem.
Heres the JSBIN: http://jsbin.com/iwihox/10/edit
THE PROPER SOLUTION:
The proper way to do this, is add float:left to both classes .a and .b. Making them float does change the box-model, so depending on your surrounding markup, you will need to add clear:both to the next tag in your HTML to have the document properly flowing.
CHECK THIS FIDDLE: http://jsbin.com/iwihox/19/edit
Let me know, Thanks!

CSS - aligning wrapped floating divs to the center

I am trying to create something like a gallery that shows different number of images per row based on the width of the browser. This has already been achieved using overflow: hidden in the outer div and float: left in the inner div.
However, what happens with this is that my images are always aligned to the left, leaving alot of whitespace on the right. How do I make it such that the gallery is always centered in the screen no matter how many images there are per row.
My code is on http://codepen.io/anon/pen/KzqAs
Thank you very much. :)
How about this: http://codepen.io/anon/full/mtBbF
HTML
<div class="container">
<div class="red box">red</div>
<div class="blue box">blue</div>
<div class="black box">black</div>
</div>
CSS
body{
text-align:center; /*You would need to define this in a parent of .container*/
}
.container{
display: inline-block;
margin: 0 auto;
text-align: left;
}
.box {
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
float: left;
}
Demonstration
You need to use an id(or class) on the main div. Set width: 300+px and margin: auto
Also your boxes should be with display: inline-block to allow them to begave "inline"
I have changed colors of the boxes a bit for better visibility.

CSS Tables and spacing

I'm new to CSS tables, it's my first time. So I discovered that when you set display:table to a div, you can forgot all margin and padding (and whatever) you're planning on it's future cause they are ignored. Nice. The only property I've found to make this job is border-spacing but it is a little limited comparing with margin and padding. It have only two ways of styling, horizontal and vertical. You can't set the value of the side you want like border-spacing-left or border-spacing: 0 1px 2px 3px.
In my case, I have a table with one row that lies on the top right corner of the screen. I want it attached on the very top and spaced horizontally, which caused me problems. The top is okay but the right detaches from the border when I use border-spacing: 10px 0.
Smart guys like me don't see this as a problem, cause we can set it margin-right negatively, making it be attached again on the right side of the browser. Wow, whata smart ass I am!
However, I saw an little damn scrollbar on the bottom of the screen like a roach under your cooker at the kitchen. I hate roac.. scrollbars specially horizontals, so I got my inseticide called overflow-x and kil.. set it to hidden. She run desperately and dissapeared, but I know that she's there, somewhere staring at me. And this is driving me crazy.
Seriously now. I think this isn't the right way to do that and I hope somebody can teach me how to do it.
This is my scenario on Fiddle
Thank you in advance(mainly for reading this crap).
There are a few ways of achieving what you're trying to achieve. Most commonly, using display: table, display: table-cell, etc isn't very high on the list.
So, here's how I would do it: http://jsfiddle.net/VKnQZ/1/
Do bear in mind that I don't know the full circumstance of what you're attempting so it may well be that I'm missing a (valid) reason that you're using table display properties in the first place.
You'll notice a few things here:
I've done away with your table display properties. I don't think you need them, and floats do the job just fine (just remember to clear them).
I've removed your display from the cell divs. As someone in the comments above pointed out, divs inherit display: block by default. The additional dimensions set their size as you already had it.
I'm using the + selector to put in the spacing between elements. In this instance div + div is essentially short-hand for 'every div which is beside another div' - so all of them aside from the first.
Hopefully that achieves what you're aiming for and does away with all the nasty hacky overflow/margins/etc.
Here's the code:
HTML (only change is to remove the row div):
<div id="nav">
<div class="red"></div>
<div class="green"></div>
<div class="blue"></div>
</div>
CSS:
body {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
#nav {
float: right;
}
#nav div {
float: left;
width: 120px;
height: 40px;
}
#nav div + div{
margin-left: 10px;
}
.red { background-color:#f00 }
.green { background-color:#0f0 }
.blue { background-color:#00f }
and can you tell me why are you trying to imitate table behavior when you have "table" tag? it could be styled pretty well also
what you are doing is sometimes called "divitis"
edit:
you can position table absolutely http://jsfiddle.net/n83kT/
Not too sure if this the right place to discuss float and display :)
But , flex is on his way, and display is already quiet efficient.
Display + direction and you could kick floats away.
border-spacing version : http://jsfiddle.net/GCyrillus/2EZ3F/
border-left version : http://jsfiddle.net/GCyrillus/2EZ3F/1/
<section>
<div id="nav">
<div class="red"></div>
<div class="green"></div>
<div class="blue"></div>
</div>
</section>
section is to set direction .. or not
unset & reset direction to fake float ,
else use text-align if you dislike this method.
In CSSheet, notice inline-table instead of table so it reacts to text-align and or direction (not all pages are EN or FR :) )
body {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
section {
direction:rtl; /* unset regular if you wish, else text-align will do for inline-boxes */
}
#nav {
direction:ltr;/* reset/set here if you want cells from left to right */
display:inline-table;
border-spacing: 10px 0 ;
}
#nav div {
/*direction:ltr; reset here if you want cells from right to left */
display: table-cell;
width: 120px;
height: 40px;
}
#nav div + div {
margin-left: 10px;
}
.red {
background-color:#f00
}
.green {
background-color:#0f0
}
.blue {
background-color:#00f
}
My 2 (late) cents for a different point of view :)
For completeness, I would like to offer the case for the often overlooked inline-block display type.
Similar to the use of floats, the HTML is as follows:
<div id="nav">
<div class="red"></div>
<div class="green"></div>
<div class="blue"></div>
</div>
and the CSS:
#nav {
position:absolute;
top:0;
right:0;
}
#nav div {
width: 120px;
height: 40px;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: bottom;
}
#nav div + div {
margin-left: 10px;
}
This inline-block approach behaves similarly to the floated-child-div's approach.
In this application, I can't think of a reason to use one over the other.
One minor consideration is that inline-block is not supported in some older browsers.
Otherwise, both approaches use the same mark-up and the CSS rules are similarly simple.
The choice may depend a lot on the content that you use in the #nav div elements.
Demo fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/audetwebdesign/EVJPN/

Div element not aligning in the middle of another div element

This is my relevant page markup:
<div id="header">
<div id="logo">
Home
</div>
<div id="user_box">
test
</div>
</div>
And my relevant CSS:
#header {
width: 960px;
height: 110px;
}
#logo {
background: url('/assets/img/logo.png') no-repeat center;
width: 300px;
height: 110px;
float: left;
}
#user_box {
width: 300px;
height: 60px;
float: right;
vertical-align: middle;
}
Now, I want to position the user_box div in the vertical middle of the header div. After a lot of Google'ing and experimenting, I have learned that this isn't easy. Apparently, I can't vertical align a block element such as a div. So I'm looking for a different way to do this.
I saw the hacky display: table; method and tried using it, but it didn't change a thing. Also tried changing the element to an inline element like a span, but that didn't work either. I even tried using margin: auto 0; for some god awful reason, and that also didn't work at all.
So I'm asking for help. How do I vertically align this div inside my header div?
Thanks!
Set the line-height of user_box equal to the height of header
Working demo: http://jsfiddle.net/AlienWebguy/pyppD/
vertical align doesn't work with divs its for aligning elements in tables. In your case you could just use this
#user_box { margin-top:25px; } /*110-60 = 50/2 = 25*/
So I fiddled around with your code a little bit, and here's what I got: http://jsfiddle.net/3k8XE/
As you can see I'm using a table as the header, and applying the same id to each element, except the two inner divs have changed to td's. I've added an inner td to compensate the space between the two divs since they were originally set to float:left/right.
(Of course the borders are just to show what's actually going on here.)

How do you set a floating div's width to take up remaining space without pushing other divs down?

For part of a layout I want to make, I want to use three divs, all floating next to each other. The Left and Right have a max-width set, which works fine, but I want the middle div to expand its width to fill the remaining space. To clarify, the left and right divs may have a width of anywhere from 0px to the max-width, depending on what is in each, and I want the middle div to expand its width so that it takes up the rest of the space not used by the divs on either side.
The problem it's having now is that if there is a lot of content in the middle div, it's expanding and pushing the right div off to the next line instead of keeping it up with the other two.
Here's the css I have so far:
#left-column {
width: auto;
max-width: 200px;
height: auto;
float: left;
}
#middle-column {
float: left;
width: auto;
}
#right-column {
width: auto;
max-width: 200px;
height: auto;
float: right;
}
...and the HTML:
<div id="left-column">...</div>
<div id="middle-column">...</div>
<div id="right-column">...</div>
I think that this can be accomplished using a three-column, single-row table, but I absolutely do NOT want to use tables - I want to accomplish as much as possible by using pure css.
Thanks!
Classic Floats
If you order it:
<div id="left-column"></div>
<div id="right-column"></div>
<div id="middle-column"></div>
and you float the left column left, and the right column right, the middle column should fill in the remaining space. You will have some issues with margins, borders and paddings though.
Flexbox
If you don't need to support older browsers, you can use flexbox. With flexbox, this sort of structure becomes much simpler, and the markup doesn't need to change.
You will need to be able to select the parent element, so for the purposes of this demo, the code will be wrapped by <div class="wrapper">.
.wrapper {
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
height: 200px;
}
.left {
background-color: red;
width: 100px;
}
.middle {
background-color: green;
flex: 1;
}
.right {
background-color: blue;
width: 100px;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="left"></div>
<div class="middle"></div>
<div class="right"></div>
</div>
The height and widths are added explicitly so that the <div>s are visible. With actual content, the columns would automatically adjust.
I don't want to dredge up an old thread here but I was looking for a solution to my own problem and came across this and I thought I'd better share with Francisco...
Tables are a terrible idea for positioning layout, the main problem is that before a table will show/render in the browser it has to render it's </table> tag.
Could you imagine if Facebook's column content used a table for it's layout, it would take ages for it to render anything to the screen when checking your timeline for instance!
Another issue is that tables behave extremely differently in each browser.
Basically: <table> for layout = NO!, <table> for listing out rows of data or information = YES!

Resources