I have a div element with to resize:vertical style on it. The contents of the div are generated, so it could be empty or filled. The div needs a max height, so that the height increases as new items are added, but it caps the size at 150px and makes the div scrollable.
I could easily accomplish that with the max-height style, but if I want to resize it, it doesn't work.
The second idea I had, was to just use the height style, but by doing this, the div's not adjusting its height if the contents are smaller than 150px.
Is there any way of doing this without javascript?
I don't think this is possible without JavaScript and even if it would be: What do you want this for? Please take a look at browser support of resize!
(What do you mean by "filled" - is this done via PHP or JS? Actually no matter which one you use, you could check if there is any content and if so add an .empty class to the div)
Related
strong textSeems like a common problem, but in my case it's complicated by a few extra requirements, so what I found on SO and MDN didn't lead me to a full solution.
Simple premise:
Horizontal nav bar, full width of the page, semi-transparent background, variable number of tabs (extra space filled with same background as tabs).
Easy, right? Give the container element rgba background, set nav items display:inline or float them left and you're golden.
Complication 1: Active tab has to have a triangular cutout (see pic).
Ok, I can have a cutout by setting background-image to a png with transparent bit. The background of the parent element would get in the way - so set background to individual elements instead of parent.
What about the variable width "empty space" past the tabs (see pic)? Ok, put an empty element with a larger than life width, and cut it off with overflow:hidden on the parent.
Complication 2:
Buttons need tooltips on hover.
Ah, the thrill! The suspense! overflow:hidden won't do unless I put tooltips outside of nav div altogether (which would probably work - but seems smelly).
So, here are a few things I tried:
Old implementation which doesn't have the "filler" element width problem but clips off half a tooltip (with overflow:hidden):
http://codepen.io/istro/pen/aHcdi
Messing with display:table seems to give little control over how display:table-cell div width is decided, also needs content to display the div in the first place. Content can be moved away, but still no good (didn't even add a tooltip here):
http://codepen.io/istro/pen/uIcfn
Messing with floats (tooltip sorta where I'd want it to be more or less), but clueless how to make the last "filler" element fit remaining width:
http://codepen.io/istro/pen/aIGxB
So the question - how could I make a div to fill the remaining width with CSS only? Or perhaps I'm asking the wrong question altogether, in which case what ideas would I use to implement it cleanly?
Thanks!!!
I am trying to float divs horizontally, however its falling into a new line.
http://jsfiddle.net/nyCrY/4/
It works only if I set width of the #holder higher than its content.
Is there a way to do this without setting the fixed width on #holder?
Thank you!
Not really with pure CSS.
You can use a static width (which you don't want to do), you can use floats + whitespace (which is unreliable), or you can dynamically calculate the necessary width with javascript and set the style's width to that number.
According to this tutorial: http://css-tricks.com/how-to-create-a-horizontally-scrolling-site/
I spent some time playing with the float property and the white-space
property to see if I could find a way to fight browser auto-wrapping,
but I didn't have much luck. Page elements which are floated but do
not have a width exhibit a property where they expand to the width of
the content inside them. I thought perhaps if I put a bunch of float
elements inside of that, it might just keep expanding beyond the width
of the browser window. No dice. There is also a white-space: nowrap;
property in CSS which I thought might be able to be exploited to fight
the auto-wrapping, but it only works for text elements, not blocks or
just any old thing you set to inline. Oh well.
So, he basically is saying, no its not possible with just css.
But he goes on to say that you can do some javascript magic to achieve it:
JavaScript clearly has the ability to manipulate page elements and do
calculations on-the-fly.
I have two-column layout with a header and footer. I have created a JSFilddle with demonstrating this.
The left-column will normally have more content than the right-column.
How can I get the right-column to expand to the height of the left column, or just fill the height of the view-port? I have sene examples of something similar, but not with a footer that is always at the bottom of the display.
How can I get the textarea to fill the height of its parent, the right column (I haven't even got close to solving this one).
I've just edited your jsfiddle.
The idea is to set a min-height on your right column block, and have it determining the height of the whole content section instead of inheriting height attribute from its parent.
Secondly, regarding the text-area. This bit is tricky, you need to use javascript to render it upon everytime a user resize their view port, and update the attribute height of the textarea accordingly.
Cheers
minHeight is important incase you have an empty content container and you dont want the footer to be pushed up right under the nose of the header. Hence minheight prevent that from happening. Once the height of the right column exceeds minHeight, the parent div will be expanded accordingly.
I see nothing wrong with h being the height of the viewport if you really want it to always expand full windows. However I recommend using $(window).innerHeight instead of Height(). But again, this is javascript and your code will never render the same thing on different browsers, so keep that in mind :)
$(window).resize(function() { var h = $(window).height(); $('#MyTextarea').css('height', h-300); });
I have a form I'm floating. When there is an error, via jquery, I'm adding some content to a p within the form. However, the form doesn't vertically resize to fit the new content. Is there something I have to do to get a floated element to resize when the content within it changes?
Do you have height or other css styling applied that would prevent it from vertically resizing?
Also, what browser(s) is it happening in? It may be a browser bug.
If the is floated, too, then depending on the styling (position: absolute), its dimensions may not be considered to be "in" the form.
Is there a height set on the content? When float is on, the default is to fix height to line height. It is possible that your width on the form is set too low, and the text is trailing off through the block element containing your form Try messing with the line-height property and see what you get. Also, position absolute will mess with you (as Richard mentions below)
Also, consider min-height. This won't work in IE6, but you can substitute with a height in IE6 which acts like min-height in certain circumstances.
Post you code so I can be more specific.
I've coded myself into a corner or I am overseeing something obvious here. I have a semi-fluid CSS layout that is designed like this:
header - 100% width at all times, contains a x-repeated background image
container - fluid (960px to 1200px, centered, contains two columns)
footer - 100% width at all times, contains a x-repeated background image
In almost all cases this works fine.
In summary, the design as a whole scales to any width, yet the content part only to 1200px at a maximum. However, since this concerns a photo site, sometimes images are wider than the container width of 1200px and the image breaks out of it. This is perfectly fine, I want the full image to be shown. However, I want the header and footer to scale to the widest element, in this case the image. This is not happening and is particularly troublesome when I resize the window to a width less than the image and then scroll to the right using the horizontal scrollbar: it leaves a clear gap on both the header and footer whilst I want them to stretch to at least the image/content width.
Simply setting the width to 100% is not enough as that concerns the viewport, not the content width. I can forcefully use min-width with a large value for the header and footer, but that leaves a horizontal scrollbar in normal resolutions. I could hide that scrollbar using overflow:hidden but that would chop of content and not display a scrollbar when the window is small.
To make a long story short, I guess what I want is that this layout would work as a table would work: if one column's content is wider than its size, it pushes all other rows to that same width. The largest width determines the total width. I prefer a solution without javascript, but am thinking it is either not possible or I am overseeing something very obvious?
100% width sets the element's width to 100% of the width of the element it is contained in. In your case, it seems this is the window itself (or the body element). To make the header and footer divs (I'm assuming you're using divs here) scale with the image, they will probably need to either be included in the same div that the image is in, or inside a div that the image div is also in, assuming that div is scaling to the correct width (don't assume it is scaling to fit the image).
However, in many cases using a table for your layout can be much cleaner, and will handle the type of horizontal scaling you're looking for without needing to resort to css hacks.
To make a long story short, I guess
what I want is that this layout would
work as a table would work
display: table on the common container of these elements, and display: table-row or table-cell on its children. This will not work in IE6, but clever things can be done with its CSS expression() hack to simulate this.
I would rather suggest, however, that you not set a maximum width at all, and allow the design to flow better according to the user's desired window size.