MVVM light toolkit messenger problems - mvvm-light

I'm using your messenger class to communicate between views/controls and viewmodels.
Currently I have the same usercontrol multiple times on the same view.
The problem is that when one viewmodel sends a message back to the usercontrol then all of the
usercontrols (of that same type) in my view get updated.
How can this be prevented?
FYI, I played around with the token functionality that you provide, but I couldn't make it work for my particular case.

Have you tried altering your usercontrol so that upon construction, you can specify whether or not it should Register for that particular message? I would do that as a starting point.
Another thing to watch out with using Messenger.Default -- it isn't threadsafe, so if you end up using it in lots of places other than usercontrols (like in worker threads to notify the main thread of events happening), then you had better wrap it in another class that performs the requisite locking.

You could set the target of the message if your message inherits from MessageBase class,
or use a Guid as a Messenger token.

Related

Messaging Centre - Subscribing Event in the ViewModel Constructor

I am trying to send data from one ViewModel to another using Messaging Centre.
I have subscribed the event in 2nd ViewModel's constructor. But the event is not subscribed as the constructor is not compiled until I open the page/view corresponding to the ViewModel.
I am using MVVM Light, until now I had an understanding that the VM's constructor are compiled when ViewModelLocator is called at the app startup.
Can someone help me understand this better and how can I subscribe the event i.e. compile the constructor without the VM being called.
Perhaps you are thinking about this in the wrong way. Without seeing code it's difficult to see what you are trying to achieve exactly, but what you could do is subscribe to the event elsewhere in your app, for example in your App.xaml.cs. When the event fires, at that point navigate to a new page of type ViewModel2 and pass any details required as a navigation parameter.

asp.net usercontrol development/implementation

I've developed an ASP.NET user control, instances of which may appear several times on a single page. Without getting into too much application detail, when the value of any one of the instances changes, all of the other instances need to be refreshed. Currently, in order to accomplish this, I'm requiring that the consuming page implement a couple of methods which iterate through each control on the form, find all the instances of my user control, and call a Refresh method in each one.
Functionally, it's working perfectly. However, I'd like to force the developer of the consuming page to implement these two methods exactly as per my requirements. I could have them implement an interface, but that doesn't provide the functionality in each method. Or I could have them extend an abstract class, but in either case (interface or abstract class) how can I force them to inherit? I need something that will trigger a compiler error if the necessary abstract class is not extended by the consuming page. Any ideas?
Thanks.
You can enforce implementation by using 'abstract methods' in C# or using the 'MustInherit' keyword in VB.NET.
In your particular case, you're expecting the developer to essentially implement 'your' code to force the refreshing and this is something I wouldn't want delegate. Without knowing too many details I would be tempted to utilise the 'Observer' design pattern or possibly the 'Mediator' using either a separate object as a controller or even applying the controlling / publishing code to the webpage. Here's a practical example of the 'Observer' in ASP.NET.
HTH

what is the main point to enter in asp.net?

Like in java the entry point is public static void main(String[] args). What is the entry point in ASP.NET using C#? Usually, I see the page load method, is that the entrance point?
Does asp.net follows some different criteria?
You need to take a look at the ASP.NET life-cycle:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178472.aspx
There is no "main point" in asp.net. What you would think of as "main" in asp.net is code that's already written for you. Instead, you inherit a base class ("Page"). As part of this, you can (but don't have to) implement several event handlers. Through the process of building a page, Asp.Net will raise these events for you to handle. The process of running through these events in order is called the page lifecycle.
For your case, there are several options depending on what you want the main method to do:
Handle the Application_Start event in the Global.asax file
The Page_PreInit event (the very first event in the page life cycle)
The Page_Load event (the most common event handled in the page life cycle)
You said something wrong.
public static void main() is a Java method too, used as entry point for console applications the exact way C# does.
You might want to compare servlets/JSP and ASP.NET, don't you?
Servlets vs IHttpHandler
They are, conceptually, the same thing. They are also both interfaces. Their configuration is different (WEB.xml VS Web.config or .ashx file), but their entry points are "almost" the same.
Servlet:
Init()
Service()
Destroy()
IHttphandler:
ProcessRequest() <<--- does all the things
IsReusable {get;} <<--- optional
JSP vs ASP.NET pages
If you define a constructor, or override the InitializeFramework() method, then you have a starting point (or, at least, a breakpoint to put at the almost-very-beginning of the execution), but not an entry point.
Page class implements IHttpHandler, if you allow me some Java syntax in .NET world, but you don't see anything. You might want to go deeper into page life cycle as linked by other users. Basically explaining, Page encapsulates its complete life cycle in events, that resemble clock ticks when you work with VHDL components.
Execution is not concurrent as it seems, but since you can't know the exact order in which controls will raise the same event, you can go as the VHDL example in which you can't read the value of a registry before the next clock tick.
There are several events: here are the most important in their execution order
Init: page is initialized, GET, POST and cookie data are available. If you override, then you should initialize your webapp context (ie setup db connections)
Load (PreLoad and LoadComplete too): page loads the UI data and restores, if needs to, the state of controls displayed on the page. If you set up DB connections in init, you shouldn't use them before PreLoad to be sure you don't get an exception. The same applies to sequence PreLoad->Load->LoadComplete.
DataBind: data-bound controls load data from database, file or whatever (ie. tables get the data to display)
Validation: if you use validators, their business logic is processed to determine whether the page is valid or not. No further explaining here
Postback processing: if you click a button, then its server-side code is executed
PreRender (and PreRenderComplete): the page is getting ready for being rendered into HTML. Usually stores internal data into a collection named ViewState which I won't explain any further here. Usually you would finalize some data-related operations and/or decide whether to render or not some controls on the page according to the page's state. For example, if you have a CAPTCHA and the user solved the puzzle, you won't render it again
Render: not actually a programmatic event, but the page gets rendered to HTML
Dispose: resources get freed, as occurs with Destroy in Java

Intercept Page object creation to hook up events

I'm looking for a way to intercept the ASP.NET processing pipeline in such a way to be able to register event handlers to all events on the Page class. The reason is, I need to maintain a session-bound instance of a component that needs to be notified of all important Page events, starting from OnPreInit.
There's an arbitrary number of Page descendants in the application, which are not under my control. Hence I cannot use an approach like using a single custom descendant, that would notify the session-bound component, as a base class for all pages in the web application.
I don't think creating a custom IHttpHandler or IHttpModule implementation would solve the problem. Also note I cannot create a custom HttpApplication descendant.
It isn't going to be an elegant process to do what you are looking at, especially if you need to handle multiple page events, but in theory it is fully possible from within the Global.asax to setup handlers that you need for each and every page.
The trick here is to add your code to the global.asax in the PreRequestHandlerExecute method, from here you can get access to the HttpApplication object, get access to the page from there, and then register your events. This process is necessary as a new page instance is created for every page that is processed.
Now, other options as you know are far more elegant, but this should get to where you need to be. One helpful tutorial I found although around Themeing shows you the whole process here.
EDIT:
After seeing your comment, yes, you can simply do what I'm stating above, in a custom HttpModule. The article I linked even shows you that process :)
Without knowing more about what you're trying to accomplish it really sounds like you do indeed want to create a http module or handler. You might want to take a look at this question

What is the equivalent to IScriptControl for Web.UI.Page?

We've been using IScriptControl to tie javascript objects to our UserControls and ServerControls, and it's worked fine.
The problem is that ASP.NET seems to provide no method to tie a javascript object to a Page. Up to now, we've been putting plain functions in the global namespace, but I am developing a serious allergy to that practice.
It'd be easy enough to wrap our functions into a javascript class, and to include the javascript file on the page, but how to instantiate the object, how to reference it from callback events, and how to pass data to it from the code-behind, I haven't figured out.
Or rather, the methods we've been using up to now (hidden fields, emitted javascript strings, etc.), really bug me.
Anyone have better ideas?
There isn't any association between the JS file and the page, unless you build it. With script controls, the common practice to store state is hidden fields (the ACT uses this approach). The only other ways to communicate with the server is through a web service call, form posted data, or by invoking a __doPostBack (but that isn't AJAX).
You can create some base architecture to link the two together. With script controls, the server renders a $create statement to pass properties and event handlers from the server to the client; data being posted back to the server is stored in hidden variables and processed on the client (with most script libraries), so script controls and ACT hide a lot of this for you, and you would have to build some of this if you wanted to automate this. It may help to study the client-server interaction to give you ideas of what to do if you wanted to customize this.
Funny, I was thinking of the same thing for my Nucleo project (a third party library of mine) on codeplex, but I haven't yet gotten around to it.

Resources