Having the following markup
<p>
No items found. Want to
<asp:LinkButton ID="LinkButton1" runat="server" OnCommand="LinkButton1_Command" Text="create" />
a new one?
</p>
how do i localize both the text and LinkButton.Text? I don't want to create two literals that frame the link. Is there a better way?
If you could get away with a straight HTML solution instead of the asp:LinkButton, you could embed the entire thing into one resource string.
No items found. Want to a <href="javascript:__doPostBack('Link1','')">create</a> a new one?
You'd then have to manually check the Request["__EVENTTARGET"] instead of using the wired up event handler.
I'm not saying it's a good idea, but I guess it could work.
In this particular case you pretty much have to. However, your grammar is more complex than it needs to be - you would probably never insert a different word before "a new one" - e.g. "Want to [delete] a new one?" doesn't make sense. So I'd recommend putting "a new one" as part of the link text, so you only need one literal for the "No items found".
Related
Is it possible to add default values to a sharepoint FormField object?
Here is my code:
<SharePoint:formfield runat="server" id="ff8{$Pos}" ControlMode="Edit" FieldName="Body" ItemId="{#ID}" __designer:bind="{ddwrt:DataBind('u',concat('ff8',$Pos),'Value','ValueChanged','ID',ddwrt:EscapeDelims(string(#ID)),'#Body')}" />
<SharePoint:fielddescription runat="server" id="ff8description{$Pos}" FieldName="Body" ControlMode="Edit" />
Basically, I want the form field's default value to be more than just the Body parameter (perhaps 2 parameters and some custom text). Is this possible?
(Also, I know you can substitute the SP form Field with an ASP TextBox, but I'm running into problems with that--specifically, the text box doesn't support rich text, and the post-back doesn't preserve line breaks.)
Thanks in advance!
It looks like I was able to solve this. Other forums had me using an ASP Text box and writing code behind in C#, but it's really not necessary if you use a Sharepoint:InputFormTextBox instead.
<SharePoint:InputFormTextBox ID="ff8{$Pos}" RichText="true" text="{concat(#Body, "CustomText", #secondparameter)}" RichTextMode="FullHtml" TextMode="MultiLine" runat="server" __designer:bind="{ddwrt:DataBind('u',concat('ff8',$Pos),'Text','TextChanged','ID',ddwrt:EscapeDelims(string(#ID)),'#Body')}" Width="99%" Rows="10"/>
If this was an obvious solution, please forgive my ignorance. This is new territory for me.
I am trying to create a specific aspx page where I display clickable links based on information in a sql database. For example one column could be the anchor tag another column could be the path to the link itself etc. In the past I would pull this information from sql and put it into a non-visible Label (say linkLabel1). Then in the page itself I would insert <%linkLabel1.text%> to insert the link path from the database to the appropriate area.
I hope I'm not confusing things too much here and that makes sense how I explained it.
What I would like to do is set up a way that I could simply enter a new row into a SQL table with link information and a web page automatically displays the new link for me.
I guess I am mostly looking for insight, opinions, or directions of what approach to consider. I can elaborate if I was unclear (wouldn't be awfully surprising if I was not).
Thanks in advance for anyone's time on this matter.
Since you are displaying this in a table, you could use a GridView for this. The columns that will display the link could be defined as hyperlink columns as so:
<Columns>
<asp:HyperLinkField
HeaderText="Header text"
DataNavigateUrlFields="PropertyContainingTheHRefForTheAnchor"
DataTextField="PropertyContainingTheTextForTheAnchor"
/>
</Columns>
So for example, if you return a record set containing these columns:
TextProperty PathProperty
See Details Assets/SomeOther/
Click me Products/AnotherPath/
Your grid will render these as:
See Details
Click me
If you define the column as:
<Columns>
<asp:HyperLinkField
HeaderText="Header text"
DataNavigateUrlFields="PathProperty"
DataTextField="TextProperty"
/>
</Columns>
At the client's request, we just upgraded a custom CMS system for a large site from FCKEditor 2.x to CKEditor 3.5.3.
Inside an ItemTemplate I have a custom UserControl tag in which the attributes are populated by DataBinding, like so:
<my:Viewer runat="server">
<ItemTemplate>
<my:CustomTag runat="server"
ImageUrl='<%# DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "ImageUrl") %>' />
</ItemTemplate>
</my:Viewer>
So, the point is that the above works just fine. However, when the HTML is put into the latest CKEditor, CKEditor changes the ImageUrl attribute to use double-quotes instead of single quotes. Once it's changed to double quotes, it causes a parsing error on the .aspx page. Changing: "ImageUrl" to "ImageUrl" works, but it's not ideal for our client who is going to have to update every page that exists in a very large CMS system. So, I'm asking this question hoping someone might know of a way to toggle CKEditor to use single quotes in HTML attributes by default instead of double quotes to reduce the amount of work my client is going to have to do.
I'm only looking for easy configuration-type changes, not patching the editor, etc.
This should do what you want
Taken from here
http://cksource.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=20647&sid=f47526ecfb1f2303ad0b923ceed7aafe&start=10
To avoid CKEditor changing special chars:
switching in source view:
CKEDITOR.instances.TEXT.on( 'mode', function(ev) {
if ( ev.editor.mode == 'source' ) {
var str=ev.editor.getData();
str=str.replace(/&/g, "&").replace(/>/g, ">").replace(/</g, "<").replace(/"/g, "\"");
ev.editor.textarea.setValue(str);
}
});
When save edited document:
var html=CKEDITOR.instances.TEXT.getData()
html=html.replace(/&/g, "&").replace(/>/g, ">").replace(/</g, "<").replace(/"/g, "\"");
I'm going to say that the " solution that I mentioned being too much work is simply the only answer...just to put some closure on this. Or, if I can find a way, I'll withdraw the question. Thanks rqmedes for trying...I'd actually forgotten all about this question until I got your response
:)
when trying to translate the confirmation message to Norwegian i get the following error:
Cannot have more than one binding on property 'OnClientClick' on 'System.Web.UI.WebControls.LinkButton'. Ensure that this property is not bound through an implicit expression, for example, using meta:resourcekey.
i use Explicit localization in the following manner:
<asp:LinkButton ID="lnkMarkInvoiced" runat="server" OnClick="lnkMarkInvoiced_OnClick"
OnClientClick="<%# Resources: lnkMarkInvoicedResource.OnClientClick%>"
Visible="False" CssClass="stdtext" meta:resourcekey="lnkMarkInvoicedResource" ></asp:LinkButton>
here's the local resource file entry:
<data name="lnkMarkInvoicedResource.OnClientClick" xml:space="preserve">
<value>return confirm('Er du sikker?');</value>
if i remove the meta attribute i get the English text(default).
how do i get the Norwegian text appearing without resorting to using the code behind?
Update:
removing the meta attribute prevents the exception from occurring but the original problem still exists. I can't get the Norwegian text to show.
only the default English text shows.
Another Update:
I know this question is getting old but i still can't get the Norwegian text to display.
If anyone has some tips please post a response.
Looks like you're making the problem harder by inlining the onclick. Why not split it out to a separate line?
<script>
function markInvoiced()
{
return confirm('<%= Resources.SomehowGet.lnkMarkInvoicedResource.OnClientClick%>');
}
</script>
<asp:LinkButton ID="lnkMarkInvoiced" runat="server" OnClick="lnkMarkInvoiced_OnClick"
OnClientClick="return markInvoiced();"
Visible="False" CssClass="stdtext" meta:resourcekey="lnkMarkInvoicedResource" ></asp:LinkButton>
And while we're looking at your code, you realize that you're essentially building an <a> tag, right? As such, why not just build an <a> and save yourself some grief?
And finally, next project why not ditch the built-in ASP.NET localization nighmare in favor of something sane like FairlyLocal, in which case you'd write this:
<a href="#" onclick="return confirm(<%=_"really?"%>) onserverclick="lnkMarkInvoiced_OnClick" runat="server">
<%=_("Mark Invoice")%>
</a>
Are you using the .NET resource manager and satellite assemblies to store your localized resources? It looks like you have hard-coded the alternative language in your markup, rather than storing it in a language-specific resources assembly...
.NET has some extremely rich localization and globalization capabilities. If you use them properly, localization should be a pretty automatic thing (assuming your client is providing their language code as part of the HTTP headers). Even if your client has not configured their browser with the appropriate language, it is still easy enough to manually change the UI culture via a user request (clicking a flag icon, configuring a setting, etc.)
This article might be helpful: ASP.NET Web Page Resources Overview
That meta tag is using implicit localization when you're using explicit localization in the OnClientClick. You will need to choose one method or the other. If you are to use explicit localization, you'll need to do the necessary work to set the proper culture info in your application in the code-behind.
The following asp label fails to be displayed in the browser, can someone please
tell me what I am doing wrong. I expect to see the value <abc> but instead
I get nothing.
<asp:Label ID="Label1" runat="server" Text="<abc>"></asp:Label>
By the way, I realize that I can accomplish the same thing doing the following:
<asp:label id="Message1" runat="server"> <abc> </asp:Label>
But that is not really what I am asking for, what I would like to know is if using a string such as "<abc>" in an attribute value for an asp elements is allowed or not. In other words, is this an ASP.Net bug or is this behavior by design and if it’s by design what’s the reason for such design?
Thank you very much.
Believe it or not, but you can include entities without escaping them, thus:
<asp:Label runat="server" ID="myLabel" Text="<abc>" />
This will render an <abc> tag.
Edit: OK, sorry, you want to display the brackets, not make a tag, of course..
Using entity references in the Text attribute will give the same result - an (invisible) <abc> tag - because they are translated when the tag is parsed server-side. What you must do is:
<asp:Label runat="server" ID="myLabel" Text="<abc>" />
This will give the desired result - the & entity reference will render an ampersand to the client. Followed by lt;, the result is a correct client-side entity reference (<). Which will render as <.
To answer you questions explicitly: Yes, using entity references in ASP.NET attributes is (obviously) OK, since it's an XML format. This is not really a 'decision' on Microsoft's part (and certainly not a bug) - i's simply XML.
The trick is realizing when the entity references are parsed (when the tag is parsed on the server), and what the resulting text is, which is what will be sent to the client.
Yes it's allowed of course. Label control's purpose is to show text and markup to client. And it's really useful I think. injected code is your responsibility.
The asp.net aspx parser will unescape the "<" and ">" to "<" and ">". It will generate something like this method:
[DebuggerNonUserCode]
private Label __BuildControlLabel1()
{
Label __ctrl = new Label();
base.Label1 = __ctrl;
__ctrl.ApplyStyleSheetSkin(this);
__ctrl.ID = "Label1";
__ctrl.Text = "<abc>";
return __ctrl;
}
If you wanted to write it in the text property you could double escape like "<", but it is probably easier just to write it between start and end tags like you mention.
<asp:Label ...><abc></asp:Label>.