Something is definetly wrong with my ul and li. I know I made a huge mistake but I cannot find it. When you go here:
http://icpy.webs.com/text/Mass.htm
You will see both thumbnail images are different but both pop ups have the same bigger image as the first thumbnail.
Why are these before doctype? What are those custom elements?
<link rel="stylesheet"type="text/css"href="../text/aboutleft.css">
<img src="http://icpy.webs.com/content/masslayout.png"/><br>
____________________________________________________________________________<br><br>
<x><re>colors available</re></x><br>
<x><gre>available to unlimited users </gre></x><br>
<x>Changes available: box, link, username</x><br><br>
Why don't you use a relative link for the masslayout.png?
Have you ever heard of the <hr> element in HTML?
I don't see any thumbnails, neither popups and I don't know what you are talking about.
jQuery is stored on Google and it is in cache for most of the users. Why do you store and link another one?
Your CSS:
.fancybox-custom .fancybox-skin {
box-shadow: 0 0 50px #222;
}
body {
max-width: 700px;
margin: 0 auto;
#cas ul {
list-style-type: none;
}
}
What is this?? What did you want?
<a class="fancybox" title="Mass Sale layouts" href="#inlineframe>
Href attribute needs a close quote mark.
Look at your source code and after that into the inspector and please correct as many errors as you can.
I think the reason it's like that, because both boxes are within the same <a>-Tag, which of course links to only one of the big images:
<a class="fancybox" title="Mass Sale layouts" href="#inlineframe">
<img src="http://dgamerhelp.webs.com/soccer/layouts/BEA01.png"/>
<div id="inlineframe" style="width: 1040px; height: 785px; display: none;">
</div>
</a>
<a class="fancybox" title="Mass Sale layouts" href="#inlineframe">
<img src="http://dgamerhelp.webs.com/soccer/layouts/JAK01.png"/>
<div id="inlineframe" style="width:1040px;height:785px;display: none;">
</div>
</a>
Related
When we insert a image to blogger post it automatically inserts a separator with 'text-align:center;'. I want to remove it(and set it to left instead of center). But it's hard to remove it manually for every image in every post. Is there a easy way to do this automatically?
I tried .post-body img{float:left;} template CSS. This gets the image to left, but then texts flow to right side of the image instead of under the image. Please help me to do this.
Edit: Below is the normal div that an image would be automatically surrounded when a image is added to a blogger post. Below that is the texts of post.
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="-----.html"; imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 0em; margin-right: 1em;">
<img alt="" border="0" src="1.bp.blogspot.com/1.JPG"; title="" />
</a></div>
<br/>
<span style="font-size: large;">text paragraph texts texts</span><br />
Within the <b:skin> or in a separate <style> within the <head> of your template include the following CSS code:
.post-body .separator {
text-align:left !important
}
I can't see the rest of your code, if you uploaded something like a js.fiddle that would help! The code below should fix the text alignment with your images, if it doesn't let me know!
.post-body img {
float: left;
text-align: left;
}
.post-body .separator a {
margin: 0!important;
}
First off - this is my first question ever (I'm still a beginner) and I can't say how much I appreciate this site and all the help I've found on here. Hopefully every question I ask can help someone else too :)
I realize not many people use imagemaps any more but I have one and twitter bootstrap (version 3.0.0) is screwing up my coordinates - putting the links in the wrong places. I can make it work with the following code but then it wont resize to fit the screen. Any tips?
<style>
<!Driving me nuts - without this the imagemap links are in the wrong places - with this it wont resize>
#img_ID {
max-width:none;
width:auto;
display: inline;
}
</style>
Here is a snippet of the actual imagemap code
<div style="width:100%">
<img id="img_ID" src="NewMatGuide.png" USEMAP="#map" border="0" class="" width:100% alt="">
</div>
<Map id="map_ID" name="map">
<AREA shape="RECT" COORDS="80,151,258,252" HREF="PlacementResults.php?ChosenArea=A">
<AREA shape="RECT" COORDS="80,328,258,432" HREF="PlacementResults.php?ChosenArea=B">
<AREA shape="RECT" COORDS="80,521,258,620" HREF="PlacementResults.php?ChosenArea=C">
I'd recommend, rather than an image map, make 3 divs that are links with the following HTML and accompanying CSS.
<div id="box_a">
<a class="box_link" href="PlacementResults.php?ChosenArea=A"></a>
</div>
<div id="box_b">
<a class="box_link" href="PlacementResults.php?ChosenArea=B"></a>
</div>
<div id="box_c">
<a class="box_link" href="PlacementResults.php?ChosenArea=C"></a>
</div>
Use percentages to define the coordinates. Given that your X1 and X2 coordinates are the same for the links in your image map, the following example (with different %s to actually cover your image correctly) should work.
#box_a, #box_b, #box_c {
margin-left: 10%;
margin-top: 5%;
height: 15%;
width: 25%;
}
.box_link {
display: block;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
You should check out this page to learn more about making div links. I would also suggest using NewMatGuide.png as a background-image and define the size of #img_ID.
This is Wordpress-related question, but since desired solution is purely CSS-related, I posted it in here, not at wordpress.stackexchange.com.
In my current style, if image has no following caption, it is placed using HTML code like that:
<p>
<a href="http://cnn.com/file.jpg">
<img src="http://cnn.com/file-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-55">
</a>
</p>
In my current style, it is styled like that:
img {
display: block;
padding: 5px;
background-color: #eee;
border: 1px solid #ddd;
}
Which draws simple border around it.
If there is a caption following image, entire HTML in this part is a little bit more complex:
<div id="attachment_55" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px">
<a href="http://cnn.com/file.jpg">
<img src="http://cnn.com/file-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" class="size-medium wp-image-55">
</a>
<p class="wp-caption-text">Caption</p>
</div>
Currently caption is not styled at all (as per my currently selected theme).
What I would like to achieve is to have entire div styled (image and caption), if there is any caption. If I'm not mistaken, that would require to style img (as currently) only, if it is not followed by <p class="wp-caption-text">. If it is, then img should not be styled at all and it second-in-row parent (<div class="wp-caption">) should be styled instead.
That's all for the algorithm. But how to code this in CSS (and whether it is possible at all) -- I don't know.
The simpliest solution would be to never style img and always style <div class="wp-caption"> instead, no matter if there is caption following image or not. But the problem is, that Wordpress is adding that div only, if there is a caption. So styling only it, would result in no border at all, if there is only image.
if you can use Jquery.
you can manipulate the markup then. if the pattern of your img and img with caption is going to be like that, you can do this.
$('img').each(function(){
if($(this).parent().parent().hasClass("wp-caption")){
$(this).parent().parent().addClass('img');
}
});
am sure this code can be optimized even better, but it should give you an idea.
see this fiddle
I have this html:
<div class="speaker-list">
<div class="view-content">
<div class="views-row views-row-1 views-row-odd views-row-first">
<div class="views-field views-field-title">
<span class="field-content">
Keith Anderson
</span>
</div>
<div class="views-field views-field-field-job-title">
<div class="field-content">VP, Digital Advisory</div>
</div>
<div class="views-field views-field-field-company">
<div class="field-content">RetailNet Group</div>
</div>
<div class="views-field views-field-title-1">
<span class="field-content">
Store of the Future
</span>
</div>
<div class="views-field views-field-field-headshot">
<div class="field-content">
<div id="file-53" class="file file-image file-image-jpeg contextual-links-region">
<div class="content">
<img typeof="foaf:Image" src="/kanderson.jpg" width="180" height="180" alt="" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
It's dynamically generated by a Drupal view, so I can't change the output html at all. I need to work with what is here. Here's the desired result:
Without any styling on the headshot, this is what it looks like:
I tried to style the image to force it to float to the left of the text:
.view-speaker-list div.view-content div.views-row div.views-field
div.field-content div.file-image div.content img {
border: 1px solid #666;
float: left;
position: relative; /* tried with and without position (inc. absolute) */
left: 30px;
}
Obviously I'm doing something wrong, because this is what I get (with relative position):
and with absolute position:
I've also tried putting the float on the "uppermost" div class that holds the image, with no position on the div:
.view-speaker-list div.view-content div.views-row
div.views-field-field-headshot {
float: left;
}
It gives the same result as the position: relative screenshot.
Where am I going wrong? If I had control over the html I'd do it differently, but I'm not sure how to deal with all of these nested divs.
EDITED TO ADD NEW SCREENSHOT FOR #WEX
Here's what it looks like when I tried to use your code with the html reordered - http://jsfiddle.net/mPa7z/
I'll try to explain the "right" way to use float so that you can see why your way didn't work.
In your post, you try to apply float: left to the <div> surrounding your image, but that technique only works when the element you are floating is above all the elements you want to wrap around it. That "may" solve your problem, but that technique has it's pitfalls if you're trying to use it to create two distinct columns - if the text on the right is taller than the floated element, the text on the right will wrap below it. So then you have to add another container around your non-floated elements to ensure that it won't wrap. This solves your problem, but doesn't really help if you can't even edit your markup!
I'd argue that the technique I've posted below works better, and solves your problem: http://jsfiddle.net/Wexcode/AQQwX/
.view-content {
position: relative;
min-height: 180px;
padding: 0 0 0 180px; }
.views-row { padding: 20px 0 0 20px; }
.views-field-field-headshot {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0; }
If you have access to the View itself in Drupal, you can reorder the elements. When logged into Drupal, open the View (in Drupal 7: Structure > Views > Viewname), look for "Fields" and click on the triangle next to "add", which will have a popup, then click "rearrange". You can then drag the photo field to be the first item in the View, then adjust your CSS to float the image to the left.
EmmyS,
Instead of trying to get the headshot to float:left, have you considered making the others float:right? This will give the impression that the image is floating left without having to change the markup in any way.
div.speaker-list div.views-row > div.views-field {
float:right;
clear:both;
}
div.speaker-list div.views-row > div.views-field.views-field-field-headshot {
float:none;
clear:none;
}
The above CSS should work with that specific configuration without altering any of your other Drupal generated markup. In order to make sure that other CSS does not interfere, I've applied as much specificity as possible. Since the headshot will be back in the containing <div>, you shouldn't need to alter the size of it unless the store is simply too large (I don't know without looking at your data). Finally the CSS is concise, so you can add any additional styling you need on a per-element basis.
Hope this helps,
FuzzicalLogic
When you can drop somewhere else on the page some code, you can gain control over the HTML by using jQuery. Then you could make modifications to the DOM tree.
But I do not understand why you can not edit the HTML. Isn't Drupal open source? You should be able to find the file using FTP and manipulate it.
Which method is best?
<div id="header">
<a id="logo" href="#"><img width="172" height="80" src="logo.jpg" alt="Clevex logo"></a>
<h1>slogan of company</h1>
</div>
<div id="header">
<a id="logo" href="#"><img width="172" height="80" src="logo.jpg" alt="Clevex logo"></a>
<p>slogan of company</p>
</div>
<div id="header">
<a id="logo" href="#"><img width="172" height="80" src="logo.jpg" alt="Clevex logo"></a>
<span>slogan of company</span>
</div>
<div id="header">
<div id="logo">
<img width="172" height="80" src="logo.jpg" alt="Clevex logo">
slogan of company
</div>
</div>
I would think a better approach would be to have the slogan as a span. The slogan is not truly the first header of your document. Think if it were a table of contents would you see the slogan as the first entry?
The slogan is probably subject to some design rules (e.g. the position relative to the logo). As the slogan probably makes little sense in a content / SEO way anyway, and it's more important it looks right, I would recommend putting the slogan into the image.
Looks good, apart from the fact that a slogan isn't really a heading, hence a <span> or something without semantic meaning should be used instead of <h1>
I guess not;
It's better to do it like this:
<h1 onclick="document.location='/';"><span>CompanyName</span></h1>
<h2>Slogan here</h2>
Since your logo is part of the layout and not a image in context (for example a product picture) you should put it in the h1 background.
Do your CSS like this:
h1 {
background-image: url(logo.png);
width: 200px;
height: 80px;
cursor: pointer;
}
h1 span {
display: none;
}
This way it is both readable for the and user and a search engine.
No, something like the following would be better:
<div id="header">
<h1>Company</h1>
<h2>Slogan</h2>
</div>
h1 { text-indent: -90000px; background: transparent url(/img/logo.png) no-repeat left top; width: 172px; height: 80px; }
h1 a { display: block; width: 172px; height: 80px; }
The h1 is only used once, for the company itself. Then you replace that logo text with an image using CSS. This way you keep the markup within your CSS.
In general, I think you'll see everyone's slogan as an image rather than text (with the text as the alt attribute). And href="#" means "go to the top of this page." It should probably be a link to the home page instead.
...As long as you use alt, search engines will index it properly. If this is the home page, that might justify having the name and slogan in h1 and h2 elements, but elsewhere it's probably not necessary. It's probably better to drive traffic based on the actual content of the page and not try to make every page the same in the eyes of search engine spiders. The company name is probably already in the url, which is plenty.