I simply want to go through and find every numerical value in a single, or batch of, CSS files and multiple times two, then save.
Any suggestions for the easiest way to do this?
Using regular expressions could solve your problem. For example, in python you could do the following:
import re
input = "#content {width:100px;height:20.5%;font-size:150.25%;margin-left:-20px;padding:2 0 -20 14.33333;}"
regex = re.compile("-?[.0-9]+")
scaled_numbers = [float(n)*2 for n in re.findall(regex, input)]
split_text = re.split(regex, input)
output = ''
for i in range(len(scaled_numbers)):
output += "%s%.2f" % (split_text[i], scaled_numbers[i])
output += split_text[-1]
This code could be reduced in length, but I've deliberately left it less compact for readability. One flaw with it is that it contracts floats to only 2 decimal places, but that can be easily changed if you really need extended decimals (change the number in "%s%.2f" to the desired number of places).
Note also that this code could change the names of CSS selectors (for example, #footer-2 would become #footer-4.00). If you wanted to avoid that, you'll need to adjust the code to ignore text outside of {...}.
Related
Working with postgres 9.4 and using PGAdmin III: I have a schema with a character field that MAY contain "new lines" (NLs), or MAY contain double spaces, or neither. I need to divide the field into 3 segments by either of the above factors or by 26 characters in length.
If the total length is 26 or less, I just copy it as is.
If it has NLs, then I split it by those.
If no NLs but it has double spaces, I split it by those.
Finally, if none of the above, I want to split it into 3 26 character chunks.
For context; the column is data entered by customers into a 3 line box. anywhere from 4 characters up to 78. Some use NLs, some use spaces to push the text to the next line, some have luck with spacing so use neither.
Here's the part of the query to gather the first line:
CASE WHEN LENGTH(detail) < 27 THEN detail
WHEN detail LIKE E'%\n%' THEN SPLIT_PART(detail,E'\n',1)
WHEN detail LIKE E'% %' THEN SPLIT_PART(detail,E' ',1)
ELSE LEFT(detail, 26)
END AS line1,
When I test this on a sample schema, the first three parts work exactly as I need but the "ELSE" part never does. The LEFT statement workout outside of the CASE statement but not within.
I've tried enclosing it with a SELECT clause, nesting several CASE-WHEN-ELSE statements, and other things to no avail.
Oddly, it DOES work if I take out the "SPLIT_PART" line referring to '% %'.
Short of giving up on the double-space split, is there another solution, or have I just formatted something wrong?
CASE WHEN LENGTH(detail) < 27 THEN detail
WHEN detail LIKE '%\n%' THEN SPLIT_PART(detail,'\n',1)
WHEN position(' ' in detail) > 0 THEN SPLIT_PART(detail,' ',1)
ELSE left(detail,26)
After another bit of time mucking about, I suspected the LIKE E'% %' might be the issue - and it was. Simply changing it to LIKE E' ' allows it to work like I wanted.
Added:
Turns out the best solution is a combination of "position" to determine if the double space exists, and split-part to separate correctly at the location.
I am new to Julia so sorry if this question is obvious.
I am trying to use Julia to help me run a series of finite element models, which use a text input file to give instructions to the finite element solver. Basically, I would like to use Julia to read in the base input file, edit some parameters on some lines of the file and then write it as a new file. I am getting hung up on a couple things though.
Currently, I am reading in the file like this
mdl = "fullmodelSVTV"; #name of input file
A = readlines(mdl*".inp")
This read each line from the file in as a separate string in a vector which I like because it makes it easier to edit the sections I want but it also makes things more difficult when I try to write to a new file.
I am writing the file like this.
io = open("name.inp","w")
print(io,A)
close(io)
When I try to write to a new file the output ends up look like this
Output from code
which is ["string at index 1","string at index 2","string at index 3"...].
What I would like to do is output this the exact same way is it is read in with string at each index of the vector on its own line. I would also like to remove the brackets and quotation marks from the file, as they might interfere with the finite element solver.
I think I have found a way to concatenate all of the strings at each index and separated them with a new line like shown below.
for i in 1:length(A)
conc = conc*"\n"*lines[i]
end
The issue with this is that it takes a long time to do given the size of the input files I am working with and I feel like there has to achieve my goal.
I also cannot find a way to remove the brackets or quotation marks when writing the file.
So, I'm wondering if anyone has any advice for a better way to write these text files in terms of both concatenating all of the strings from the vector when outputting as well as outputting without the brackets and quotation marks.
Thanks, any advice is appreciated.
The issue with print(io,A) is that it is printing a representation of the vector, but in fact you want to print each element of the vector. To do so, you can simply print each line in a loop:
open("name.inp", "w") do io
for line in A
println(io, line)
end
end
This avoids the overhead of string concatenation.
I want to extract information from downloaded html-Code. The html-Code is given as a string. The required information is stored inbetween specific html-expressions. For example, if I want to have every headline in the string, I have to search for "H1>" and "/H1>" and the text between these html expressions.
So far, I used substr(), but I had to calculate the position of "H1>" and "/H1>" first.
htmlcode = " some html code <H1>headline</H1> some other code <H1>headline2</H1> "
startposition = c(21,55) # calculated with gregexpr
stopposition = c(28, 63) # calculated with gregexpr
substr(htmlcode, startposition[1], stopposition[1])
substr(htmlcode, startposition[2], stopposition[2])
The output is correct, but to calculate every single start and stopposition is a lot of work. Instead I search for a similar function like substr (), where you can use start and stop words instead of the position. For example like this:
function(htmlcode, startword = "H1>", stopword = "/H1>")
I'd agree that using a package built for html processing is probably the best way to handle the example you give. However, one potential way to sub-string a string based on character values would be to do the following.
Step 1: Define a simple function to return to position of a character in a string, in this example I am only using fixed character strings.
strpos_fixed=function(string,char){
a<-gregexpr(char,string,fixed=T)
b<-a[[1]][1:length(a[[1]])]
return(b)
}
Step 2: Define your new sub-string function using the strpos_fixed() function you just defined
char_substr<-function(string,start,stop){
x<-strpos_fixed(string,start)+nchar(start)
y<-strpos_fixed(string,stop)-1
z<-cbind(x,y)
apply(z,1,function(x){substr(string,x[1],x[2])})
}
Step 3: Test
htmlcode = " some html code <H1>headline</H1> some other code <H1>headline2</H1> "
htmlcode2 = " some html code <H1>baa dee ya</H1> some other code <H1>say do you remember?</H1>"
htmlcode3<- "<x>baa dee ya</x> skdjalhgfjafha <x>dancing in september</x>"
char_substr(htmlcode,"<H1>","</H1>")
char_substr(htmlcode2,"<H1>","</H1>")
char_substr(htmlcode3,"<x>","</x>")
You have two options here. First, use a package that has been developed explicitly for the parsing of HTML structures, e.g., rvest. There are a number of tutorials online.
Second, for edge cases where you may need to extract from strings that are not necessarily well-formatted HTML you should use regular expressions. One of the simpler implementations for this comes from stringr::str_match:
# 1. the parenthesis define regex groups
# 2. ".*?" means any character, non-greedy
# 3. so together we are matching the expression <H1>some text or characters of any length</H1>
str_match(htmlcode, "(<H1>)(.*?)(</H1>)")
This will yield a matrix where the columns are (in order) the fully matched string followed by each independent regex group we specified. You would just want to pull the second group in this case if you want whatever text is between the <H1> tags (3rd column).
For example, I have many HTML tabs to style, they use different classes, and will have different backgrounds. Background images files have names corresponding to class names.
The way I found to do it is yank:
.tab.home {
background: ...home.jpg...
}
then paste, then :s/home/about.
This is to be repeated for a few times. I found that & can be used to repeat last substitute, but only for the same target string. What is the quickest way to repeat a substitute with different target string?
Alternatively, probably there are more efficient ways to do such a thing?
I had a quick play with some vim macro magic and came up with the following idea... I apologise for the length. I thought it best to explain the steps..
First, place the text block you want to repeat into a register (I picked register z), so with the cursor at the beginning of the .tab line I pressed "z3Y (select reg z and yank 3 lines).
Then I entered the series of VIM commands I wanted into the buffer as )"zp:.,%s/home/. (Just press i and type the commands)
This translate to;
) go the end of the current '{}' block,
"zp paste a copy of the text in register z,
.,%s/home/ which has two tricks.
The .,% ensures the substitution applies to everything from the start of the .tab to the end of the closing }, and,
The command is incomplete (ie, does not have a at the end), so vim will prompt me to complete the command.
Note that while %s/// will perform a substitution across every line of the file, it is important to realise that % is an alias for range 1,$. Using 1,% as a range, causes the % to be used as the 'jump to matching parenthesis' operator, resulting in a range from the current line to the end of the % match. (which in this example, is the closing brace in the block)
Then, after placing the cursor on the ) at the beginning of the line, I typed "qy$ which means yank all characters to the end of the line into register q.
This is important, because simply yanking the line with Y will include a carriage return in the register, and will cause the macro to fail.
I then executed the content of register q with #q and I was prompted to complete the s/home/ on the command line.
After typing the replacement text and pressing enter, the pasted block (from register z) appeared in the buffer with the substitutions already applied.
At this point you can repeat the last #qby simple typing ##. You don't even need to move the cursor down to the end of the block because the ) at the start of the macro does that for you.
This effectively reduces the process of yanking the original text, inserting it, and executing two manual replace commands into a simple ##.
You can safely delete the macro string from your edit buffer when done.
This is incredibly vim-ish, and might waste a bit of time getting it right, but it could save you even more when you do.
Vim macro's might be the trick you are looking for.
From the manual, I found :s//new-replacement. Seemed to be too much typing.
Looking for a better answer.
I am trying to write a custom report in Spiceworks, which uses SQLite queries. This report will fetch me hard drive serial numbers that are unfortunately stored in a few different ways depending on what version of Windows and WMI were on the machine.
Three common examples (which are enough to get to the actual question) are as follows:
Actual serial number: 5VG95AZF
Hexadecimal string with leading spaces: 2020202057202d44585730354341543934383433
Hexadecimal string with leading zeroes: 3030303030303030313131343330423137454342
The two hex strings are further complicated in that even after they are converted to ASCII representation, each pair of numbers are actually backwards. Here is an example:
3030303030303030313131343330423137454342 evaluates to 00000000111430B17ECB
However, the actual serial number on that hard drive is 1141031BE7BC, without leading zeroes and with the bytes swapped around. According to other questions and answers I have read on this site, this has to do with the "endianness" of the data.
My temporary query so far looks something like this (shortened to only the pertinent section):
SELECT pd.model as HDModel,
CASE
WHEN pd.serial like "30303030%" THEN
cast(('X''' || pd.serial || '''') as TEXT)
WHEN pd.serial like "202020%" THEN
LTRIM(X'2020202057202d44585730354341543934383433')
ELSE
pd.serial
END as HDSerial
The result of that query is something like this:
HDModel HDSerial
----------------- -------------------------------------------
Normal Serial 5VG95AZF
202020% test case W -DXW05CAT94843
303030% test case X'3030303030303030313131343330423137454342'
This shows that the X'....' notation style does convert into the correct (but backwards) result of W -DXW05CAT94843 when given a fully literal number (the 202020% line). However, I need to find a way to do the same thing to the actual data in the column, pd.serial, and I can't find a way.
My initial thought was that if I could build a string representation of the X'...' notation, then perhaps cast() would evaluate it. But as you can see, that just ends up spitting out X'3030303030303030313131343330423137454342' instead of the expected 00000000111430B17ECB. This means the concatenation is working correctly, but I can't find a way to evaluate it as hex the same was as in the manual test case.
I have been googling all morning to see if there is just some syntax I am missing, but the closest I have come is this concatenation using the || operator.
EDIT: Ultimately I just want to be able to have a simple case statement in my query like this:
SELECT pd.model as HDModel,
CASE
WHEN pd.serial like "30303030%" THEN
LTRIM(X'pd.serial')
WHEN pd.serial like "202020%" THEN
LTRIM(X'pd.serial')
ELSE
pd.serial
END as HDSerial
But because pd.serial gets wrapped in single quotes, it is taken as a literal string instead of taken as the data contained in that column. My hope was/is that there is just a character or operator I need to specify, like X'$pd.serial' or something.
END EDIT
If I can get past this first hurdle, my next task will be to try and remove the leading zeroes (the way LTRIM eats the leading spaces) and reverse the bytes, but to be honest, I would be content even if that part isn't possible because it wouldn't be hard to post-process this report in Excel to do that.
If anyone can point me in the right direction I would greatly appreciate it! It would obviously be much easier if I was using PHP or something else to do this processing, but because I am trying to have it be an embedded report in Spiceworks, I have to do this all in a single SQLite query.
X'...' is the binary representation in sqlite. If the values are string, you can just use them as such.
This should be a start:
sqlite> select X'3030303030303030313131343330423137454342';
00000000111430B17ECB
sqlite> select ltrim(X'3030303030303030313131343330423137454342','0');
111430B17ECB
I hope this puts you on the right path.